Win in Trend and Win in Range | Page 5 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Why and how Win-Win in Forex is possible 56 replies

Bollinger Bands Range And Trend Trading 21 replies

My Trend and Range Journal 82 replies

Win 2 trades out of 10 and win 180 pips 8 replies

Trend and Range 1 reply

Attachments: Win in Trend and Win in Range
Exit Attachments

Win in Trend and Win in Range

  • #81
  • Apr 19, 2018 8:08am Apr 19, 2018 8:08am
Quoting carddard
I'm working on a lite, community edition and I'm looking for a small group of testers to do forward testing for me, just on demo until it is fully tested and proven to work. I only have 3 slots on my VPS and so more testers would be appreciated, but I don't want to just give this away until it has been polished. Anyone interested?
I have VPS and 2 slot empty. Let me know if I can contribute in this. Thanks
.................
  • #82
  • Apr 19, 2018 8:19am Apr 19, 2018 8:19am
You have to adjust with the market flow. If it is an indicator based strategy, obviously it won't work in different market. Suppose your strategy is for ranging market, it won't work for trending market. You have to modify your strategy. That's the reason short term success is not a real success.
  • #83
  • Apr 19, 2018 8:52am Apr 19, 2018 8:52am
I have VPS and some space available. Please, let me know if I can help
  • #84
  • Apr 20, 2018 11:29am Apr 20, 2018 11:29am
Not too shabby of a performance at all!
I didn't expect it to go so well, with it being a largely unpolished piece.

It's running on AUDJPY, EURCHF and EURUSD just for kicks.

It's clear to me that having EURCHF and EURUSD in the mix at the same time does not help with diversification at all, which was exactly why I put them together - just to see where it goes.

I'll need some help forward testing different pairs to find the best ones to put together in a basket.

So far the JPY pairs seem to be pretty decent.

I have a crazy idea of going with triangular triplets - GBPAUD, GBPJPY, AUDJPY - your usual triangular arbitrage pairs, minus the triangular arbitrage, just to see how it performs.

No math behind it, just test and learn..
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 1.PNG Size: 156 KB
  • #85
  • Apr 20, 2018 11:46am Apr 20, 2018 11:46am
Thanks for the interest guys..

Give me some time - trying to polish this up a little bit and give it to a few testers.
  • #86
  • Apr 21, 2018 5:40pm Apr 21, 2018 5:40pm
Quoting carddard
Thanks for the interest guys.. Give me some time - trying to polish this up a little bit and give it to a few testers.
I would love to test your system for you. Please pick me I want to be apart
  • #87
  • Apr 22, 2018 1:21am Apr 22, 2018 1:21am
Why have a trade explorer and have things locked , you like to hid things ? 56% WINNING TRADES 44% LOSEING TRADES WOULD GIVE A BETTER INSITE TO YOU TRADING IF YOU UNLOCKED THE REST OF THE STATS
people leave, but this thread will go on for ever
  • #88
  • Apr 22, 2018 5:41am Apr 22, 2018 5:41am
Quoting Aussi
Why have a trade explorer and have things locked , you like to hid things ? 56% WINNING TRADES 44% LOSEING TRADES WOULD GIVE A BETTER INSITE TO YOU TRADING IF YOU UNLOCKED THE REST OF THE STATS
Dear friend, you might want to replace your caps lock button.

Didn't realize there was a TE rulebook. My apologies for flouting TE rules for using a widely available TE option! Terribly sorry.

Thank you for your constructive feedback. It really helps us to grow as a community and build successful systems together. Keep it up my brother!
  • #90
  • Apr 22, 2018 12:48pm Apr 22, 2018 12:48pm
Quoting carddard
{quote} Dear friend, you might want to replace your caps lock button. Didn't realize there was a TE rulebook. My apologies for flouting TE rules for using a widely available TE option! Terribly sorry. Thank you for your constructive feedback. It really helps us to grow as a community and build successful systems together. Keep it up my brother!
thank you for your quick answer , it makes it better for new people , kindest regards
people leave, but this thread will go on for ever
  • #91
  • Apr 22, 2018 1:39pm Apr 22, 2018 1:39pm
Quoting carddard
Thanks for the interest guys.. Give me some time - trying to polish this up a little bit and give it to a few testers.

I am interested in testing, but not sure what the requirements are. Does this have to be performed on VPS or can it be a normal account?
What pairs and if there are spread and requirements, etc?

Thanks
  • #92
  • Apr 25, 2018 3:50pm Apr 25, 2018 3:50pm
Hi guys
Did anybody understood the logic behind this concept? I don't.
Cheers
  • #93
  • Apr 28, 2018 11:05am Apr 28, 2018 11:05am
Quoting carddard
Thanks for the interest guys.. Give me some time - trying to polish this up a little bit and give it to a few testers.
Hi carddard,

Hope that things are fine. Haven't heard from you since.
  • #94
  • Apr 28, 2018 4:01pm Apr 28, 2018 4:01pm
Looks like experts and participants keeping long rest or may be working on inventing some thing as new idea
  • #95
  • Apr 29, 2018 2:32pm Apr 29, 2018 2:32pm
I am sure he is really busy. He does have a full time job in addition to trying to code and test these strategies he has in mind. I am clomping at the bit too I want to get going testing the code
  • #96
  • May 1, 2018 3:43am May 1, 2018 3:43am
Quoting JacolineFIS
I am sure he is really busy. He does have a full time job in addition to trying to code and test these strategies he has in mind. I am clomping at the bit too I want to get going testing the code
JacolineFIS is right, I am indeed rather busy with my day job and other commitments in life.

With my free time I spend it almost exclusively on creating potentially profitable solutions.
If you have an idea that you think will work, let me know - I'll show you why it wouldn't work over the long term with a simple proof of concept.

I have narrowed down my focus on 2 algorithms of late, with the same principle detailed at the beginning of this thread, which is to win in range and in trend.
  • #97
  • May 1, 2018 7:48am May 1, 2018 7:48am
Quoting carddard
{quote} JacolineFIS is right, I am indeed rather busy with my day job and other commitments in life. With my free time I spend it almost exclusively on creating potentially profitable solutions. If you have an idea that you think will work, let me know - I'll show you why it wouldn't work over the long term with a simple proof of concept. I have narrowed down my focus on 2 algorithms of late, with the same principle detailed at the beginning of this thread, which is to win in range and in trend.
If you can give us a bit of info of what are you talking about, then we can all brainstorm on the potential failures mode.
If nobody can found any failure mode than you have the holy grail.
What about my idea?
Regards
  • #98
  • May 7, 2018 7:30am May 7, 2018 7:30am
Here's a thought experiment..
Assume you have a powerful risk management system with a robust hedging mechanism (any form of hedging - same currency/correlated/un-correlated etc).
Could that be an edge? Who says your edge has to be how you enter? What if risk management is an edge?
  • #99
  • May 7, 2018 7:50am May 7, 2018 7:50am
Quoting carddard
Here's a thought experiment.. Assume you have a powerful risk management system with a robust hedging mechanism (any form of hedging - same currency/correlated/un-correlated etc). Could that be an edge? Who says your edge has to be how you enter? What if risk management is an edge?
Yes I agree it can be an edge but I'm a bit on the worried side on systems based solely on the money management rater than also on the entries.
Usually system like that can be profitable but they require huge capital not even taking in account the risk from brokers as well.
Time & testing will proof how good is your idea.
Let's wait and see.

PS: I recently discovered a trick that can make hedging as cost effective like non hedging so I don't see any problem using hedging as well.

Thanks
  • #100
  • May 7, 2018 7:54am May 7, 2018 7:54am
Quoting Merka
{quote} Yes I agree it can be an edge but I'm a bit on the worried side on systems based solely on the money management rater than also on the entries. Usually system like that can be profitable but they require huge capital not even taking in account the risk from brokers as well. Time & testing will proof how good is your idea. Let's wait and see. PS: I recently discovered a trick that can make hedging as cost effective like non hedging so I don't see any problem using hedging as well. Thanks
I'm not suggesting solely risk/MM as a strategy - that would be silly.
Couple a decent entry criteria with that - boom! We got us a good algorithm.
0 traders viewing now