You can manage risk, but you can't manage the return

4 hour strategy (the nausbot - 4 hour trader) 12 replies
4 Hour Strategy Macd+other Indicator 21 replies
X-1102 1 hour , 4 hour and daily Tf trades 7 replies
Create a verticle line at certain hour for every certain hour 16 replies
Is the "4 Hour Strategy (MACD)" the best system here at FF? 20 replies
Trading from the Google of Phillip Nel
IT HAS TO DO WITH RISK APPETITE
God Bless Phillip!
Disliked{quote} Hi nic73, I looked to your pdf. Her is my comment The second trade completely agreed! I also looked to it and didn't took this trade because of the bad R:R (<1) The first trade: price is above 89 (mood is uptrend) price already back to 8 and 21.... so price needs to be at the end of the trend will we have profit off it! and I didn't see a real end of trend at that time. well oke... price was consolidating and could go in both directions at that time... that was my interpretation. Well I didn't took the trade because of this reasonIgnored
Disliked{quote} well,Well... Was something wrong in my interpretation......?!?This morning I saw the MACD signal... we hit the 89 and a rule was saying: if price away form 8 it tends to go back to it.....maybe to 21 or halfway. SL was about 40pips normally I want a R:R from >1 so in this case Tp = SL = 40 pips aqnother rule is: if in an uptrend...and price is falling below the 8 it tends to to go back to it, maybe to 21 or halfway...and then price retrace to the 89 and break it (the market rhythm is completed). Anyway...if I did 40 pips at that...
Ignored
DislikedHey HappyMe, Just my two cents, I was thinking about entering long last night, but did not see a good confirmation candle before I slept. The rules show that there will be a bounce off the 89 to the 21 when price 1st hits the 89. Also, it is coming off a strong daily S/R zone. My question is, the placement of your SL. Mine would have been just below the low of the wick of your entry point, and would have been stopped out (if I had confirmation in the 15min or 1hr). Why was your SL placed where it was? Also, another reason I personally didn't enter...Ignored
DislikedHi fellow traders, Again the week is completed..and again my backtesting is!Ignored
Disliked{quote} Well again I'm looking to my backtesting... I think I can manage to go to level 2 (well level 1 is for me following the rules, step to is implementing candle stick formations...at this why I try to manage the overwelming information in his threat!) So I was searching to nice information and find a site with "The Top 10 Best Candlestick Patterns" google it and you want to get the site I think at the first result. Anyway it is talking about: Bullish patterns: Engulfing / Hammer / Harami / Piercing / Doji Bearisch patterns: Engulfing / Shooting...Ignored
Disliked{quote} well,Well... Was something wrong in my interpretation......?!?This morning I saw the MACD signal... we hit the 89 and a rule was saying: if price away form 8 it tends to go back to it.....maybe to 21 or halfway. SL was about 40pips normally I want a R:R from >1 so in this case Tp = SL = 40 pips another rule is: if in an uptrend...and price is falling below the 8 it tends to to go back to it, maybe to 21 or halfway...and then price retrace to the 89 and break it (the market rhythm is completed). Anyway...if I did 40 pips at that...
Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi HappyMe, Thank for your postings. To reply you post #26,060: you asked if I have a book on candle formation? To answer that, I downloaded some write up on candle formation on the websites; one of the website I most frequently visit is www.onlinetradingconcepts.com. Do give it a try. Now to reply post #26,063: I am not sure about your point - not that you are not correct but I am just an amateur with forex and this strategy, thus I do not have an answer to it. Perhaps can we have someone else to answer this question for us please?...Ignored
Disliked{quote} hi, well I'm also an amateur but anyway I want to improve my results. So after every trade and decision I review it and try to look if I was right, could I do it better...etc..etc... Your decision markers looks good I think (counter trend, Friday, volatile market and NPF) Thanks for your answer! The question I had wasn't: "when it is counter trend, is it likely that the price retrace to 89ma?" My question was.... Did we had indications at the emotions (tails) at arround pricelevel....in combination with RT that price could fall back...??...Ignored
DislikedThe chart attached is a 4 hour chart for EURUSD, that happened on 5th August at 0000hour. Would it make sense if I took this trade based on the following argument 1. 1. Entry candle is at the opening of the last (white) candle 2. The candle before the entry candle formed a long tail 3.At the long tail candle, price pulled back to 8am (almost did touch) at the initial stage of the candle formation. It then moved away closing with a tail. Thus possibly forming a counter trend trade. 4.MACD shows uptrend, continuous trend 5.The long tail candle 6.Profit...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Nic73, I looked to your chart and I have a counterquestion for you.... Did you had an MACD signal at that time?! If no...then you don't need to look further! No MACD signal is definitely no deal!! I think it would be wise that you read the first post in this thread again... I also did read it a lot of times (still now I often go back to Phillip lessons) Hope this answer help you to manage the system best regards, HappyMeIgnored
Disliked{quote} Hi HappyMe, In the chart that I have made (see attachment here), I thought the MACD is moving upwards, is that called as the continuous trend and is that not the MACD signal? Or have I misunderstood what MACD signal is? Thanks for commenting. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Indeed I think you misunderstood what an MACD signal in this system is. Please I suggest you read post one of this threat. In the first pdf in the first post...Phillip explained in this pdf the system in overview included the different MACD-signals.. work this through (included all his lessons, it's a real eye opener...for me at least it is/was!)Ignored