• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • User/Email: Password:
  • 8:53pm
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 8:53pm
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Printable Version

Similar Threads

Quantum London Trading Custom EA 1,504 replies

Quantum 00 Level Daily Trading 137 replies

My Quantum London EA Journal 82 replies

Quantum Physics and trading forex 74 replies

Short Term Trading is Quantum Physics 55 replies

  • Trading Systems
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
  • 1,947
Attachments: Quantum London Trading
Exit Attachments

Quantum London Trading

  • Last Post
  •  
  • 1 182183Page 184185186 218
  • 1 Page 184 218
  •  
  • Post #3,661
  • Quote
  • Mar 22, 2017 3:24am Mar 22, 2017 3:24am
  •  Genry_05
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Member | 895 Posts
Quoting johnluo
Disliked
{quote} Thanks Dear Master Genry, will use my server to monitor it! Last Dec, as I remembered I have tested a USDCAD with Stoch4cmtf for demo, but $500 ACCOUNT after 1 and half month blow up, then I closed the Demo! Will try again use this set. Thanks John
Ignored
I looked at the JohnLuo demo account: https://www.forexfactory.com/johnluo

Account soon six months, great work!
Performance Return Profit ____Pips___ Entr/Exit __Lots
All Time ___307.4% $6,173__ 4,483 __520/517 __126.8

Good luck, John!
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
2
  • Post #3,662
  • Quote
  • Mar 22, 2017 2:41pm Mar 22, 2017 2:41pm
  •  yermommy
  • | Joined Jun 2015 | Status: Professional | 73 Posts
Has anybody else tried to trade this on a US FIFO compliant broker? It seems that when only one trade is opened, it will close perfectly, but when more than one trade is open, it runs into FIFO errors and tries to close at a price of 0. I've dug through the code but cannot figure out what is responsible for it. Any ideas guys?

Note: This will not appear on a backtest, only in live trading conditions. Here's the specific message I see in the log.
Inserted Code
2017.03.22 18:31:21.919    '7*****0': order #247686686 sell 0.01 AUDUSD closing at 0.00000 failed [Off quotes]
  • Post #3,663
  • Quote
  • Mar 22, 2017 3:42pm Mar 22, 2017 3:42pm
  •  Genry_05
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Member | 895 Posts
Quoting yermommy
Disliked
Has anybody else tried to trade this on a US FIFO compliant broker? It seems that when only one trade is opened, it will close perfectly, but when more than one trade is open, it runs into FIFO errors and tries to close at a price of 0. I've dug through the code but cannot figure out what is responsible for it. Any ideas guys? Note: This will not appear on a backtest, only in live trading conditions. Here's the specific message I see in the log. 2017.03.22 18:31:21.919 '7*****0': order #247686686 sell 0.01 AUDUSD closing at 0.00000 failed [Off quotes]...
Ignored
EA controls spread and slippage. If the broker reports that there are no quotations for the closing price, then
this is not programmatically solved, but you can:
Repeat attempts to close,
Or pre-set the TP,
Or pull up the SL
Or change the broker.
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
1
  • Post #3,664
  • Quote
  • Mar 22, 2017 4:36pm Mar 22, 2017 4:36pm
  •  Genry_05
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Member | 895 Posts
Quote
Disliked
Quote: p2x4 from Today at 10:57:00 am

Ok, I found the reason: it does not work until you type "Grid size" for all grids.

Hmm, but right p2x4! Somehow we forgot about the EA grid part.

Someone used it, but basically everyone works as a lot and multipliers.
And the Starik in the grid theme continues to work hard on its geometry and as a result gets just amazing results of trading.
Can it make sense to experiment and in this part?

For the sake of interest, just from the lantern, Grider has set up ... launched from 2010 ... and about the miracle - profit

Date added: Today at 11:46:40 am

I'll add one more set to the common cause ... maybe this will stir up the silent part of the traders
Participate in the overall work of the forum with your thoughts, sets, views: d

The results of his work on the screen, but the Grid part of the set is tuned from the lantern ... just
To test how it works in the EA now.

Shl. I'll try to run it since 1999, maybe he will devour 18 years?
No ... it took 5 years and merged on February 20, 2004.
Launched on March 1, 2004 .... passed until July 15, 2008 ... then until January 2009
Well, from January 1, 2010 to today the result is on the screen.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: NZDusd_m5_v13930_Grid_section#899_010110-220317_D650$_Genry.png
Size: 58 KB
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
1
  • Post #3,665
  • Quote
  • Mar 22, 2017 4:46pm Mar 22, 2017 4:46pm
  •  billv
  • Joined Dec 2011 | Status: Member | 1,794 Posts
Quoting yermommy
Disliked
Has anybody else tried to trade this on a US FIFO compliant broker?
Ignored
I haven't but I can imagine how painful it will be.
To get around the problem the EA would need some extra code added for FIFO brokers which I think the EA developer wouldn't be interested in doing
because there are plenty of Non Fifo brokers.
Can you or your friends do some coding?
https://www.mql5.com/en/forum/181202

I would look for a Non fifo broker, there are plenty of exotic ones out there...
Alternatively, if you can wait, the new US administration is now looking at the GFC measures and could potentially remove this silly rule
Have a nice day
1
  • Post #3,666
  • Quote
  • Mar 23, 2017 12:19am Mar 23, 2017 12:19am
  •  yermommy
  • | Joined Jun 2015 | Status: Professional | 73 Posts
Thanks guys, I'll post here if I get it to work. I believe it has something to do with changing the closure from counting down from the list of trades to counting up instead. I'll post the code tweaks if I get it soon.
  • Post #3,667
  • Quote
  • Mar 23, 2017 1:24pm Mar 23, 2017 1:24pm
  •  Genry_05
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Member | 895 Posts
I will take a pause of communication on the forum - some problems require solution.
I hope to see you again.
Good luck!
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
  • Post #3,668
  • Quote
  • Mar 23, 2017 4:27pm Mar 23, 2017 4:27pm
  •  billv
  • Joined Dec 2011 | Status: Member | 1,794 Posts
Ok Genry
Stay Safe
Have a nice day
1
  • Post #3,669
  • Quote
  • Mar 23, 2017 5:32pm Mar 23, 2017 5:32pm
  •  yermommy
  • | Joined Jun 2015 | Status: Professional | 73 Posts
I figured out how to make it FIFO compliant. Replace the entire CloseNormal() method with this code. Like I thought before, it essentially begins counting through the open orders by starting at the bottom rather than the top.

Inserted Code
void CloseNormal()
{
   int   count1 = openorders;
   int   count=1;
   for(; count!=0;) // расчет кол-ва закрываемых ордеров
   {
      count=0;
      for(int trade = 0; trade<OrdersTotal(); trade++) //
      {                                                                       //
         if(!OrderSelect(trade,SELECT_BY_POS,MODE_TRADES))continue;                        //
         if(OrderMagicNumber()==mn) count++;       //
      }                                                                       //
      if(count==0)
      {
//         barNext = false;
         GridTS=0;
         prevorderprice=0;
         initialstartbuy=0;
         initialstartsell=0;
         lastorderbar=0;
         countbuy=0;
         countsell=0;
         openorders=0;
         grid1trades=0;
         grid2trades=0;
         grid3trades=0;
         grid4trades=0;
         thewaitbuy=0;
         thewaitsell=0;
         DeleteLines();
         DeleteLinesTS();
         FirstLot=0;
         if(cyc_var==1)
         {
            if(numcycles>0)  cycles+=1;
            if(!fulltime)
            {
               if(cyc1>0 && curtime>=open1 && curtime<close1 && open1 < close1)c1+=1;
               if(cyc2>0 && curtime>=open2 && curtime<close2 && open2 < close2)c2+=1;
               if(cyc3>0 && curtime>=open3 && curtime<close3 && open3 < close3)c3+=1;
            }
         }
         return;
      }
      for(int c=0; c<OrdersTotal(); c++)
      {
         if(!OrderSelect(c,SELECT_BY_POS,MODE_TRADES))
            continue;
         if(OrderMagicNumber()==mn)
         {
            if(IsTrAll(MaxWaiting)>=0)
            {
               RefreshRates();
               if(!OrderClose(OrderTicket(),OrderLots(),OrderClosePrice(),Slip_cl,0))            
               {
                  Alert("OrderClose Error: ",GetLastError());
                  if(count1 == openorders)
                  {  
                     Alert("GridClose Error: ",GetLastError());
                     return;
                  }
               }
               else count1--;
            }
            else
               if(count1 == openorders)
                  return;
         }
      }  
   }
}
3
  • Post #3,670
  • Quote
  • Mar 31, 2017 3:36pm Mar 31, 2017 3:36pm
  •  Genry_05
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Member | 895 Posts
Quoting yermommy
Disliked
I figured out how to make it FIFO compliant. Replace the entire CloseNormal() method with this code. Like I thought before, it essentially begins counting through the open orders by starting at the bottom rather than the top. ...
Ignored
Thank you, yermommy!
I'm sorry. I was busy with my problems and made the wrong translation of what you said.

Now I read everything again, thank you, a useful solution!
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
  • Post #3,671
  • Quote
  • Edited at 4:29pm Mar 31, 2017 4:14pm | Edited at 4:29pm
  •  Genry_05
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Member | 895 Posts
In November 2016, I conducted Murray level tests for use in an adviser.
To speed up the calculations, I used internal functions, and not an external indicator.
He passed this material to Staxis for evaluation of effectiveness and integration into the adviser.

Here is a test of the EA settings from November 30, 2016 for usdcad_m5. Optimization interval 01 February to 11 September 2016.
Depo $ 500, lot fixed at 0.02. It's been 4 months. The trade is not flawless, but in the plus: from $ 500 to $ 6730.

I do not know what Staxis will choose - internal functions or an external indicator. I hope that soon we will find out.
Attached Images (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: USDCAD_M5_Murrey_test_EA.png
Size: 45 KB Click to Enlarge

Name: USDCAD_M5_Murrey_test_EA1.png
Size: 67 KB Click to Enlarge

Name: USDCAD_M5_Murrey_test_Genry_EA.png
Size: 36 KB
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
2
  • Post #3,672
  • Quote
  • Apr 1, 2017 4:21am Apr 1, 2017 4:21am
  •  cescof
  • Joined Jun 2013 | Status: Member | 963 Posts
Quoting Genry_05
Disliked
In November 2016, I conducted Murray level tests for use in an adviser. To speed up the calculations, I used internal functions, and not an external indicator. He passed this material to Staxis for evaluation of effectiveness and integration into the adviser. Here is a test of the EA settings from November 30, 2016 for usdcad_m5. Optimization interval 01 February to 11 September 2016. Depo $ 500, lot fixed at 0.02. It's been 4 months. The trade is not flawless, but in the plus: from $ 500 to $ 6730. I do not know what Staxis will choose - internal...
Ignored
Hy, thanks for your effort.
How are you using Murray lines in Ea? Are you using as entry level +-1/8 2/8 or what? I'm trying to use MML in manual and with quantum but your EA could be really useful... Is that just your own or can you share it?
Thanks
Regards
  • Post #3,673
  • Quote
  • Apr 1, 2017 5:52am Apr 1, 2017 5:52am
  •  Genry_05
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Member | 895 Posts
Quoting cescof
Disliked
{quote} Hy, thanks for your effort. How are you using Murray lines in Ea? Are you using as entry level +-1/8 2/8 or what? I'm trying to use MML in manual and with quantum but your EA could be really useful... Is that just your own or can you share it? Thanks Regards
Ignored
This is a test copy for testing the idea. Verification has passed, now it's time to embed the code in the main Expert Advisor.
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
  • Post #3,674
  • Quote
  • Apr 5, 2017 10:15am Apr 5, 2017 10:15am
  •  Genry_05
  • Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Member | 895 Posts
Quoting Genry_05
Disliked
In November 2016, I conducted Murray level tests for use in an adviser. To speed up the calculations, I used internal functions, and not an external indicator. He passed this material to Staxis for evaluation of effectiveness and integration into the adviser. Here is a test of the EA settings from November 30, 2016 for usdcad_m5. Optimization interval 01 February to 11 September 2016. Depo $ 500, lot fixed at 0.02. It's been 4 months. The trade is not flawless, but in the plus: from $ 500 to $ 6730. I do not know what Staxis will choose - internal...
Ignored
...
Quoting staxis link=topic=10633.msg352773#msg352773 date=1491373308
Disliked
Hello everyone! There is no time to fade, so I just inserted the code from Genry in the Expert Advisor - http://forum.tradelikeapro.ru/index.php?topic= 10633.msg351886 # msg351886 The only thing: added the parameter pairing of levels. When it is turned on, the value of the parameter Murray's turn level for by is ignored and its value is set, which is the same as the Murray's turn level for the sell, but on the "other side." Assignment: Quote: Genry_05 on March 31, 2017, 02:23:07 pm In the settings EA levels of buy and sell are set separately, but in the Init code they are configured in pairs-long to optimize individual options. CORRECTION ADVISORAdded a block of adjustments Murray levels
Ignored
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Quantum London Trading EA v1.6.1 m13-9-40+Murrey[staxis].png
Size: 48 KB
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
1
  • Post #3,675
  • Quote
  • Apr 5, 2017 10:36am Apr 5, 2017 10:36am
  •  cescof
  • Joined Jun 2013 | Status: Member | 963 Posts
Quoting Genry_05
Disliked
{quote} ... {quote} {image}
Ignored
Hy Genry... is it possibile share Ea here? I'm in stuck with russian forum..
Thanks
Regards
  • Post #3,676
  • Quote
  • Apr 5, 2017 10:43am Apr 5, 2017 10:43am
  •  yermommy
  • | Joined Jun 2015 | Status: Professional | 73 Posts
Not yet translated, but I pulled them from the Russian forum. Just use google translate and register for an account so you can download them from the source.
Attached Files
File Type: zip MQL4.ZIP   61 KB | 575 downloads
File Type: mq4 Quantum London Trading EA v1.6.1 m13-9-40[staxis].mq4   345 KB | 518 downloads
2
  • Post #3,677
  • Quote
  • Apr 5, 2017 10:45am Apr 5, 2017 10:45am
  •  cescof
  • Joined Jun 2013 | Status: Member | 963 Posts
Quoting yermommy
Disliked
Not yet translated, but I pulled them from the Russian forum. Just use google translate and register for an account so you can download them from the source. {file} {file}
Ignored
Really appreciate... in russian forum i'm waiting for confirmation...
But maybe is better for me waiting for english one if will be any...
Thanks
Regards
  • Post #3,678
  • Quote
  • Apr 5, 2017 10:51am Apr 5, 2017 10:51am
  •  yermommy
  • | Joined Jun 2015 | Status: Professional | 73 Posts
Quoting cescof
Disliked
{quote} Really appreciate... in russian forum i'm waiting for confirmation... But maybe is better for me waiting for english one if will be any... Thanks Regards
Ignored
Well, we have other version in English so I'm sure it won't be that hard to move the translations over yourself
  • Post #3,679
  • Quote
  • Apr 5, 2017 11:09am Apr 5, 2017 11:09am
  •  cescof
  • Joined Jun 2013 | Status: Member | 963 Posts
Quoting yermommy
Disliked
{quote} Well, we have other version in English so I'm sure it won't be that hard to move the translations over yourself
Ignored
I've tried to open it in editing mode but i think it's to hard for me..
Hope for an english release ...
Thanks for effort and stay green
Regards
  • Post #3,680
  • Quote
  • Apr 5, 2017 12:50pm Apr 5, 2017 12:50pm
  •  yousername
  • Joined Mar 2017 | Status: Working smart and hard | 2,961 Posts
Quoting mer071898
Disliked
I'll throw in another one. How about the day before, July 29th. I won't go into every entry point, just the pip totals. we had 13 long trades total. Trade 13 started our lot increase at .02 lots from post 1. Please keep in mind that these pip totals do not include any spreads, commissions, slippage, etc... Trade 1 = +7 pips Trade 2 = +8 pips Trade 3 = +8 pips Trade 4 = +8 pips Trade 5 = +9 pips Trade 6 = +14 pips Trade 7 = +18 pips Trade 8 = +18 pips Trade 9 = +20 pips Trade 10 = +19 pips Trade 11 = +22 pips Trade 12 = +21 pips Trade 13 = +46 pips...
Ignored
KERAYZEEE system
This is not investment/trading advise. Will not hold accountable for loss
  • Trading Systems
  • /
  • Quantum London Trading
  • Reply to Thread
    • 1 182183Page 184185186 218
    • 1 Page 184 218
1 trader viewing now
  • More
Top of Page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2021