Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Quantum London Trading Custom EA 1,505 replies

Quantum 00 Level Daily Trading 137 replies

My Quantum London EA Journal 82 replies

Quantum Physics and trading forex 74 replies

Short Term Trading is Quantum Physics 55 replies

Attachments: Quantum London Trading
Exit Attachments

Quantum London Trading

Quoting billv
{quote} ... If the Staxis EA has received a signal to place 1 SELL trade but the extra code I have put in is stopping it Extern Input : Allow sell= false Does then the EA reset and start to look for the next opportunity or does it think that we are still in a short trade and not looking for long trade opportunities?
If the EA reboots, it finds its orders on the instrument and the magic number, and evaluates the situation based on the current settings.
He does not know how to work in two directions, so he waits for the conditions for closing existing positions. Then he will analyze the new signals.
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
Quoting Goldensniper
{quote} Hi Genry, it gives the wrong message 2017.03.17 22:19:33.881 cannot open file 'D:\Program Files (x86)\FxPro - MetaTrader 4\MQL4\Experts\Quantum London Trading EA v1.6.1 m13-8-12eng[staxis].ex4' [2] 2017.03.17 22:19:33.881 Tester: cannot load Experts\Quantum London Trading EA v1.6.1 m13-8-12eng[staxis] Any idea what the problem it is? I can test QLT v.1.49.ex4 and EA_QLT_RSI4Cmtf_AEe.ex4 but not Trading EA v1.6.1 m13-8-12eng[staxis].ex4
Typically, such a message appears if you copied the MQ4 file to the \Experts directory, but did not compile it into EX4.
You can solve the compilation problem in 3 ways:
1. restart the MT4;
2. Use the MQL4 Editor to compile;
3. On the Experts tab, activate the menu item Refresh twice.
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
Quoting billv
... The problem is, if we trade small size we will have small gains and if we pick safer settings, the EA will not take many trades so our gains will be even smaller. You can see this limitation in your back tests. My preference is to let the EA take more trades and this is what I do with my own EA. It trades often and it trades in both directions simultaneously so sometimes we will have both short and long trades open and our risk of a margin call is reduced because some of the trades (longs+ shorts) will be cancelling each other out. ...
Yes, I agree with you and understand some complexity of this situation.
Your decision is quite reasonable and I also use this approach, but only in one direction - a small grid of orders that open for a short time, but often enough.
This strategy is also used by Vassily in his sets.
To do this, Staxis and I made the EA option "Search signal on the input side relative to the MA": for example, the entrance to 5.62 Fibo and the exit to 2.62 Fibo.

But strategically, I'm moving in the direction of the "Sniper" technology. It is well known in Russian forums. Its essence is in the exact entrance of the support / resistance area. With this input, a short SL. Those. You enter 1 lot (for example), but stop at you within 10-20 ... up to 100 dollars.
Those. The total risk is not greater than if you stretch the order network from 0.01 and .... to 0.25 ... for example the same 1% of the deposit.
If the input is correct, then you increase profit and close half, and then move SL to breakeven. Those. You are already in profit and now you can trade seriously.
When your position comes to the reversal area: you open an order in the other direction and its volume and stop - for all your profits from the second half of the previously opened position.
For example, you opened 1 lot. We made a safe - they closed half of the lot with a profit. Then the second half of the position was still some points and earned more money. Price approached the support / resistance level and signaled that was ready to turn around. On the received profit you open the counter order, for example 4 lots. The previous order of 0.5 lot you leave open is your insurance if the trend continues.
The situation is this: if you entered early, the trend continues and reaches the SL, then you have a profit from the first order and part of the second order. Loss is your SL, him control the risks of a counter order. But, as I said, the loss of a new order is within the profits from the second half of the first order.
If you entered correctly, you start to make profit from a new order in 4 lots. After confirming the turn, you can move the new order's SL to breakeven, and close the first order completely.

Therefore, I am now working on the settings of EA, where it turns out that you can enter a small number of orders at the turn. To then close a part of them with profit, and use the income from the remaining orders to trade a large lot.

Inserted Video

An example of such a trade on video. But this trader breaks the rules - does not make the safe on the first warrant.
This is wrong, and everything else - can be seen as a demonstration to my words.
If you follow the rules of the trading system correctly, then you risk only at the very first time you enter the market.
In case of an error, this SL is due to the initial capital. The subsequent entrances can only damage the profits that you have received.
Of course you need to properly perform MM.

Well, now we are working out the exact inputs: from 01 jun 2012.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: NZDusd_m5_v13921_#1741_131215(010612)-201116(160317)_D1000$_-(-)-(-)_x1.14x_Genry.png Size: 42 KB
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
Quoting Genry_05
{quote} If the EA reboots, it finds its orders on the instrument and the magic number, and evaluates the situation based on the current settings. He does not know how to work in two directions, so he waits for the conditions for closing existing positions. Then he will analyze the new signals.
Thanks Genry
Does it also consider "open trades" all open orders in the same currency pair?
even if these orders have been opened by the opposite Staxis EA which has different Magic number?
Have a nice day
Quoting Genry_05
But strategically, I'm moving in the direction of the "Sniper" technology
Is this EA for fully automatic trading or will you be closing half of the profitable trades manually?
Have a nice day
Quoting billv
{quote} Thanks Genry Does it also consider "open trades" all open orders in the same currency pair? even if these orders have been opened by the opposite Staxis EA which has different Magic number?
No, only the orders with the currency and the magic number are the same as the magic number and currency of the EA itself.

Quoting billv
{quote} Is this EA for fully automatic trading or will you be closing half of the profitable trades manually?
I only know with the trading system "Sniper". It seems that last fall EA appeared, but I did not see it.
On the video screen it is written: Robot-scalper, work on a real account.
Inserted Video

He was in EX4, I do not really like to trade a "cat in a sack".

By the way, the latest version of our adviser has set a certain record: it went with profit from January 1, 1999 to today.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: NZDusd_m5_v13921_#899_131215(01jan1999)-201116(16mar2017)_D1000$_-(-)-(-)_x1.14x_Genry.png Size: 99 KB
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
Quoting Genry_05
By the way, the latest version of our adviser has set a certain record: it went with profit from January 1, 1999 to today.
Nice result
Have a nice day
Quoting Genry_05
{quote}No, only the orders with the currency and the magic number are the same as the magic number and currency of the EA itself
Ok thanks.
So there should be no conflicts but I will do more tests to make sure.
Enjoy the weekend
Have a nice day
Quoting billv
{quote} Ok thanks. So there should be no conflicts but I will do more tests to make sure. Enjoy the weekend
Ok, thanks, mutually!
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
Hello colleagues!
Here the version of Quantum in which is added the visualization of the eintDepth3 parameter, by Snaike .
It is convenient to see how the different boundaries of the advisor interact.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Quantum with Vizual.png Size: 113 KB
Attached File(s)
File Type: mq4 Quantum_modv1.0.mq4   9 KB | 484 downloads
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
Quoting Genry_05
Hello colleagues! Here the version of Quantum in which is added the visualization of the eintDepth3 parameter, by Snaike . It is convenient to see how the different boundaries of the advisor interact.}
Thanks Genry
What is he planning to do with it?
Have a nice day
Quoting billv
{quote} Thanks Genry What is he planning to do with it?
Bill, there's no point in using it in the EA - that will make the optimization last longer. You can set this version on the chart when trading.
Visualization is necessary for the trader, the adviser - it is not necessary.
This version has an interesting idea. The indicator itself is not optimally changed.
There is an extra code that will slow down the computer. I will now remove the excess - which immediately catches my eye.
Attached File(s)
File Type: mq4 Quantum_mod v1.0edit.mq4   8 KB | 474 downloads
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
Thanks Genry
Ok I will take a look at it
Have a nice day
too dangerous to trade against trend.
Quoting Genry_05
{quote} Typically, such a message appears if you copied the MQ4 file to the \Experts directory, but did not compile it into EX4. You can solve the compilation problem in 3 ways: 1. restart the MT4; 2. Use the MQL4 Editor to compile; 3. On the Experts tab, activate the menu item Refresh twice.
Thanks Genry. It seems like it's working but have to find out how to load .set next. Will get there sooner or later
Quoting wannasay
too dangerous to trade against trend.
I agree and even more dangerous to add to losing trades.
It is a dangerous strategy so it needs adequate funds, careful selection of the currency pair, careful selection of the EA settings and finally trading knowledge is recommended.
Have a nice day
Quoting Genry_05
{quote} Yes, I agree with you and understand some complexity of this situation. Your decision is quite reasonable and I also use this approach, but only in one direction - a small grid of orders that open for a short time, but often enough. This strategy is also used by Vassily in his sets. To do this, Staxis and I made the EA option "Search signal on the input side relative to the MA": for example, the entrance to 5.62 Fibo and the exit to 2.62 Fibo. But strategically, I'm moving in the direction of the "Sniper" technology. It is well known in...
Hi Genry, this is very correct. Instead of over-filtering the EA. Should use money management to control the risk. It's all about cut risk and take profit.
Does anyone have indicator which can show last day or today's weakest and strongest main pair(EU GU AU NU UJ UCAD UCHF). It can help to choose which pair we should trade.
Re-started the optimization of the set for NZDUSD
And almost immediately received a flat schedule with a reasonable drawdown with the starting lot 0.03 at the depo 650 $.

What is the benefit of optimizing with a slightly inflated lot for a small depot?
And the fact that when you receive a profit set, you can reduce the starting lot and increase the multipliers.
As a result, we will get a decrease in drawdown due to a decrease in the volume of the first orders and more short grids,
as the increase in multipliers quickly displays the grid in plus.

We will make these changes and restart the received set from January 1, 1999 - screen 2.
Optimization of nzdusd_m5 from 13122015 to 20112016 - 11 months.
The depot remains 650 $, the test interval is 18 years.
DD turned out $ 537, for 650 a bit too much, but the depot survived all the cataclysms of 2007, 2008, 2009, 2011.
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: NZDusd_m5_v13921_#899_011212-170317_D650$_-(-)-(-)_x1.14x_Genry.png Size: 135 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: NZDusd_m5_v13921_#899_01011999-200317_D650$_Genry.png Size: 95 KB
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
Quoting Genry_05
Re-started the optimization of the set for NZDUSD And almost immediately received a flat schedule with a reasonable drawdown with the starting lot 0.03 at the depo 650 $. What is the benefit of optimizing with a slightly inflated lot for a small depot? And the fact that when you receive a profit set, you can reduce the starting lot and increase the multipliers. As a result, we will get a decrease in drawdown due to a decrease in the volume of the first orders and more short grids, as the increase in multipliers quickly displays the grid in plus....
Seth to the message (Alpari quotations):
NZDusd_m5_v13921_#899#468_131215 (01011999) -201116 (200317) _D650 $ _1274-2059 (141-537) 311-1835 (3603-1544) 0.04-0.01_x1.14x1.2_Genry.set

The value of the set marking fields:
V13921 - version of the Expert Advisor "Quantum London Trading EA v1.6.1 m13-9-21[staxis]"
# 899 - reference number
# 468 - the number of the working version, magic number
131215 - the beginning of optimization
(01011999) - the beginning of the test
201116 - the end of the optimization period
(200317) - the end of the test period
_D650 $ - deposit
_1274- Optimization profit
2059 - test profit
(141 - DD optimization
537 - DD test
) 311 - number of optimization transactions
1835 - number of test transactions
(3603-profit test
1544) - loss of the test
0.04 - initial volume of the fixed lot of optimization
0.01 - initial volume of the fixed lot of the test
_x1.14x1.2 - multipliers

PS. Sometimes the name of the set is long for MT and the set is not loaded.
You can safely remove the name of the reference number # 899 - it only matters to me.
Attached File(s)
File Type: txt NZDusd_m5_v13921#468_131215(01011999)-201116(200317)D650$_1274-2059(141-537)311-1835(3603-1544)0.txt   36 KB | 317 downloads
Wherever you go, there you are (Jon Kabat-Zinn)
1 trader viewing now