DislikedBuy order here and the stop loss above the buy order? This is new {image}Ignored
follow the flow
- #1,032,162
- Oct 21, 2015 7:31am Oct 21, 2015 7:31am
- | Commercial User | Joined Feb 2010 | 13,260 Posts
Buy order here and the stop loss above the buy order? This is new {image}
- #1,032,163
- Oct 21, 2015 7:34am Oct 21, 2015 7:34am
Dudes, don't forget that today, in NY premarket are released the earnings of Lumber Liquidators Holdings Boeing Co. Coca-Cola Co. General Motors and in the after-hour: American Express eBay Inc. and this explains all these movements
- #1,032,165
- Edited 7:47am Oct 21, 2015 7:35am | Edited 7:47am
- Joined Dec 2010 | Status: Foook Bollinger-dr.Kegel knows! | 9,794 Posts
- #1,032,166
- Oct 21, 2015 7:40am Oct 21, 2015 7:40am
- Joined Jul 2008 | Status: #welcomebackGator | 2,418 Posts
- #1,032,167
- Oct 21, 2015 7:48am Oct 21, 2015 7:48am
- Joined Jan 2014 | Status: Less is more ... | 9,059 Posts
{quote} it does not matter if its bullish or bearish. we have two orders plus++ on forex we have two traders (not sitting together) and if one is wrong the other is right so you really cant looose yeah, im not in for this guy, just speaking in general. What else do you need beside two guys sitting in a different room to change your mind then
Fix up, trade sharp ...
- #1,032,168
- Oct 21, 2015 7:51am Oct 21, 2015 7:51am
- Joined Dec 2014 | Status: Klugscheißer | 8,318 Posts
- #1,032,170
- Oct 21, 2015 7:58am Oct 21, 2015 7:58am
{quote} Do you want to set up an account and I do so, you go short, I go long, we just share profits?
- #1,032,171
- Oct 21, 2015 8:11am Oct 21, 2015 8:11am
- Joined Dec 2013 | Status: Trader | 2,141 Posts
{quote} Not so sure parity has vanished. What I'm trying to figure out is whether this bullishness that we have been seeing in the techs since the monthly engulfing bar in April is a trend change or just profit taking ( with an attempt to take it a the best price possible - even up to 1.18 -1.2) before the next leg down. I can't really find any justification for it being a trend change. If, as KenA pointed out, the party in equities had a damper put on it by China in spite of the ECB QE, then, since the relationship was inverse between equities...
f(z)=z2+c
- #1,032,172
- Oct 21, 2015 8:26am Oct 21, 2015 8:26am
- Joined Dec 2010 | Status: Foook Bollinger-dr.Kegel knows! | 9,794 Posts
{quote} Do you want to set up an account and I do so, you go short, I go long, we just share profits?
- #1,032,173
- Oct 21, 2015 8:35am Oct 21, 2015 8:35am
- Joined Jul 2008 | Status: #welcomebackGator | 2,418 Posts
{quote} Yes, you're right. I didn't want to say it's gone forever, just the long and painful (temporary?) turn before 1.00xxx definitely decimated the reckless, careless retail traders. After heading in one direction for a year produced many-many no-brainer traders, whose voice got louder and louder while the profit was bigger and bigger...but it's like in racing: being a professional driver means you know how and when to turn into a curve, not to push the pedal in a straight line...that's just reflects the performance of the vehicle.
- #1,032,175
- Oct 21, 2015 8:40am Oct 21, 2015 8:40am
- Joined Jul 2012 | Status: CME seat owner | 6,134 Posts
Be hopeful in a winning position, and fearful in a losing position.
- #1,032,178
- Oct 21, 2015 9:02am Oct 21, 2015 9:02am
- Joined Mar 2012 | Status: Trader | 2,310 Posts
{quote} This is my current theory for the long term ( a kind of combination of Gator and Bemac.) On the yearly there was a close below the 50 area if you project that where it wants to go is back to where it was before 9/11 disrupted it (because of the massive printing needed to finance the 'war on terror'. (This is not a recommendation to go short right now guys because it could theoretically even go back to retest the bottom of the mofu zone, just a very long term bias). {image}
- #1,032,179
- Edited 9:24am Oct 21, 2015 9:12am | Edited 9:24am
- Joined Jul 2008 | Status: #welcomebackGator | 2,418 Posts
{quote} May I ask why it starts at March 2001 open 0.9235
)Its that the 100 level starts from the high in September 2001 (a high that was being defended for
many months on the monthly chart) and that it couldn't break above.
It was trying to go down more from there, and it was only able to get above it after the printing started because of the wars (which were a surprise event).
The market doesnt' like it when it is prevented from going where it was trying to because of a surprise event,
and usually it tries to go back to the point that was broken, even on large timeframes.
