If you ask me to code/fix your EA... it's probably not for free...
- #1,502
- Oct 1, 2015 6:53pm Oct 1, 2015 6:53pm
- Joined Jul 2014 | Status: BAGONG!!! | 1,142 Posts
{quote} yes i was tried to close my mt4 in my vps and start my mt4 again and EA still working (vps not restart). Only today when my vps restarted, my mt4 is close, and when i starting my mt4, EA got nitification error like below. {image}
I wonder why lot size is 0.00 ....
Let me check it.
If you ask me to code/fix your EA... it's probably not for free...
- #1,504
- Oct 1, 2015 9:10pm Oct 1, 2015 9:10pm
- Joined Jul 2014 | Status: BAGONG!!! | 1,142 Posts
If you ask me to code/fix your EA... it's probably not for free...
- #1,507
- Oct 1, 2015 11:48pm Oct 1, 2015 11:48pm
Hi Radityo,
I found some order fail to create. i check your code, you check only 1 time for the order send of pending order.
What if adding some retry if the creation fail, let say 5x or checking if the server not busy or not in code.
here some findings i got. See the Pending sell are 15, and pending buy are 11.
So the gap create the profit delay
, or this can make the manual calculation not match as the order not filled when its should be.
Note : Setting as GTLIMITeurusd2 like yours and this not related to other settings except the order creation count as i understand.
I found some order fail to create. i check your code, you check only 1 time for the order send of pending order.
What if adding some retry if the creation fail, let say 5x or checking if the server not busy or not in code.
here some findings i got. See the Pending sell are 15, and pending buy are 11.
So the gap create the profit delay
, or this can make the manual calculation not match as the order not filled when its should be.Note : Setting as GTLIMITeurusd2 like yours and this not related to other settings except the order creation count as i understand.
Look for it and you will find it
- #1,512
- Edited 7:39pm Oct 2, 2015 6:48pm | Edited 7:39pm
- Joined Sep 2014 | Status: Don't make me use this! | 1,214 Posts
ok people after many many many demos (more than 30) and stuff after 4 months.... i decided to pick up the "steadiest" one in all aspects and let it run for a month (nothing less but also nothing more than that -4 trading weeks-) especially after we have a bugless (more or less) v1.7 EA and then report back to you so we can start a discussion upon strategies and what is best to each ones "style" using this EA
so this is the set file
and this is all the information you need (on the text editor i have the balance of each day taken at 00:00GMT+1 since the start)
so this is the set file
and this is all the information you need (on the text editor i have the balance of each day taken at 00:00GMT+1 since the start)
- #1,514
- Oct 2, 2015 8:47pm Oct 2, 2015 8:47pm
- Joined Sep 2014 | Status: Don't make me use this! | 1,214 Posts
- #1,516
- Oct 3, 2015 7:43am Oct 3, 2015 7:43am
- Joined Jul 2014 | Status: BAGONG!!! | 1,142 Posts
Hi Radityo, I found some order fail to create. i check your code, you check only 1 time for the order send of pending order. What if adding some retry if the creation fail, let say 5x or checking if the server not busy or not in code. here some findings i got. See the Pending sell are 15, and pending buy are 11. So the gap create the profit delay
The reason, it was not easy to find the order which wasn't filled. This grid EA was created without the use of array, so it'll be running with less memory as possible. The technical design of this EA is like placing pending orders, iterate and forget. Check all active orders, iterate and forget.
But there is price we have to pay. The problem of not using array is the manageability of orders itself. We can't easily: detect unfilled order, create a grid with gradual lot size (example like 0.01 in the inner gradually 0.02 until 0.10 in the outside), or maybe another features we want.
Even though we manage to fill the failed orders, what if it keeps failing? Like 5x, or 10x, or 100x?
I know it sounds a bit more technical but this is the fact.
And to add this small feature (I consider this as feature, not a bug; not big feature but small) requires a major change in the code.
So, the conclusion is, let us keep this questions in the discussion, let this grow. I may consider to add this in the future for the big release like v2.0.
Anyway, thanks for the inputs. Really appreciate it!
If you ask me to code/fix your EA... it's probably not for free...
- #1,517
- Oct 3, 2015 7:57am Oct 3, 2015 7:57am
- Joined Jul 2014 | Status: BAGONG!!! | 1,142 Posts
If you ask me to code/fix your EA... it's probably not for free...
- #1,518
- Oct 3, 2015 8:01am Oct 3, 2015 8:01am
- Joined Jul 2014 | Status: BAGONG!!! | 1,142 Posts
everyone should not forget that .... ok its a "free" (donations are more than welcomed of course) EA which relies on us created(? ;-) lol ) for us and all of us should make it better to OUR benefit
That's we are all about... let us make this better.
If you ask me to code/fix your EA... it's probably not for free...
- #1,519
- Oct 3, 2015 10:32am Oct 3, 2015 10:32am
{quote} I think we've had discussed this in early posts before. We need some definition for this case. Why I didn't do this? The reason, it was not easy to find the order which wasn't filled. This grid EA was created without the use of array, so it'll be running with less memory as possible. The technical design of this EA is like placing pending orders, iterate and forget. Check all active orders, iterate and forget. But there is price we have to pay. The problem of not using array is the manageability of orders itself. We can't easily: detect...
For the checking of fail, maybe make a hard limit, let say 3x retry on random time, or 5x on random time ,but keep continue the other pending order, but not checking 100 times, and maybe add a button to add the miss PO manually with a same magic so the EA still can handle it later on even we enter it manually.
Ok then, have a nice weekend Bro.
Look for it and you will find it
- #1,520
- Oct 3, 2015 7:09pm Oct 3, 2015 7:09pm
- Joined Sep 2014 | Status: Don't make me use this! | 1,214 Posts