Disliked{quote} Well the chart with 3 TLs was not attached to my previous post. {image}Ignored
Cheers,
Alfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
Supply and Demand Zones 48 replies
Price movement as a function of Supply and Demand 43 replies
Supply and demand zones and EW principles 1 reply
How Markets Work, in a Nutshell! 32 replies
Demand and Supply 1 reply
Disliked{quote} Well the chart with 3 TLs was not attached to my previous post. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} IMHO, weekly trend was 'down' there. https://charts.mql5.com/7/925/cadjpy...-markets-3.pngIgnored
DislikedHi All, I would like to share my thought on EURJPY: 1) Weekly mkt is Sz in Control 2) There are 2 zones in the daily where the mkt can be tested. Pls see attached 3) See also H4 for more details Thks {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Here is my EURJPY analysis. I think price may come down deeper than you think and daily trend will probably be 'down' there confirming the monthly down trend. Even if I would take a counter trend long in monthly or weekly demand zone, I would be watchful. Monthly : SHORT Weekly: LONG Daily: LONG (but shaky) {image} {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Weekly and Daily TLs are descending. I agree with WS121, that ascending daily TL is not valid Let's see what Alfonso thinks... by the way, I love Alfonso. A real human. My best regards to you seor Alfonso SD.TraderIgnored
DislikedHi, another example. Which ascending TL is correct ? IMO number 1 is correct and 2 is not correct. As per rules second valley in 1TL is not CP as the red candle closed below the blue hammers lowest low forming valley. (both TLs are broken and current TL should be drawn down as 3 CPs occured in the down move) {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I don't understand your chart my friend. You upload a chart, no comments on top, no explanation on the email. That's what I would call a muted chart. Besides the zones you have drawn are all invalid, nothing to do with the rules in this thread. AlfonsoIgnored
DislikedHello Alfonso and traders, There are 3 TLs on my chart. Are they drawn correctly in sequence 3,2,1 as they were created? {image}Ignored
Hope it makes sense!
Cheers,
Alfonso
DislikedHi All, Wanna share this trade which i traded last week. USDCHF ******** Monthly Side market Weekly Side Market- but Down Bias Daily is Down Trend. Entry by LTF {image}Ignored
DislikedHi all, another example. Has anybody any ideas why the drawn levels and TLs sequence is not correct? {image}Ignored
DislikedHello Alfonso and all traders, Thank you for my TLs reply. TL1 explanation was great as I did not realize myself that TL1 is correct, but the trend is not up as demand level was taken out. Thank you. I am attaching another tricky one. It is GU and M chart. Is TL drawn correctly? And is the trend no more up after the demand number 5 was taken out? TL stays valid until full OHCL candle under the TL is created. Am I correct? I hope my questions help others too. {image}Ignored
DislikedHi Alfonso, I am really trying hard to apply the rules and I can see that TLs are not that easy to draw correctly at least for me at this moment. I redrawn both charts so please give me comment if I am right this time. I do no want to bother rather showing bad and good examples, the complex view on how to do it right in different scenarios and I am picking at least for me the tricky ones. {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I think everyone is kind of interested here, because this is probably the most subjective subject in S&D. I watched every video even couple of times, read everything here and I'm praciting the method for not so short time but I still have doubts with trend lines especially when obviousness is not so obvious Alfonso, I know how much rookie these questions might seem to you, but we really can't get things...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I am happy to hear that clearing TLs questions will help more of us. I propose posting tricky scenarious. I will be posting some more if it wont bother Alfonso to comment or correct us. I hope there will be some progress so I do not look like retardIgnored