• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • User/Email: Password:
  • 6:13am
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 6:13am
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Supply and Demand Zones 45 replies

Price movement as a function of Supply and Demand 43 replies

Supply and demand zones and EW principles 1 reply

How Markets Work, in a Nutshell! 32 replies

Demand and Supply 1 reply

  • Commercial Content
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
  • 5,251
Attachments: Supply and demand in a nutshell by Alfonso Moreno
Exit Attachments
Tags: Supply and demand in a nutshell by Alfonso Moreno
Cancel

Supply and demand in a nutshell by Alfonso Moreno

  • Last Post
  •  
  • 1 281282Page 283284285 486
  • 1 Page 283 486
  •  
  • Post #5,641
  • Quote
  • May 30, 2015 6:36pm May 30, 2015 6:36pm
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting digitalko
Disliked
{quote} Well the chart with 3 TLs was not attached to my previous post. {image}
Ignored
Trendline #3 is the valid one as per the rules. I guess you wanted to know which trendline was valid. A trendline must connect the latest 2 peaks in a downtrend, number #3 is the valid one, not the others.

Cheers,
Alfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,642
  • Quote
  • May 30, 2015 6:40pm May 30, 2015 6:40pm
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting Chawl
Disliked
{quote} IMHO, weekly trend was 'down' there. https://charts.mql5.com/7/925/cadjpy...-markets-3.png
Ignored
Yes, weekly trend was down as seen on your screenshot.

There was no weekly supply imbalance, so weekly was down. By reading the number of weekly candles, it seems there was a monthly demand zone that took control in that rally.

Cheers,
Alfonso

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Screenshot1.png
Size: 51 KB
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,643
  • Quote
  • May 30, 2015 6:43pm May 30, 2015 6:43pm
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting yyc196
Disliked
Hi All, I would like to share my thought on EURJPY: 1) Weekly mkt is Sz in Control 2) There are 2 zones in the daily where the mkt can be tested. Pls see attached 3) See also H4 for more details Thks {image} {image}
Ignored
Daily supply zone tested a few times, used-up. EUR/JPY is bullish, it's retracing a bit with daily demand lower, however daily supply zone has been tested several times and very weak, potential break and removal of supply zone in the next days.

H4 demand zone you drew at the bottom is not correct, you didn't cover the lowest lows, not correct as per the rules.
Cheers,
Alfonso

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Screenshot1.png
Size: 54 KB
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,644
  • Quote
  • May 30, 2015 6:45pm May 30, 2015 6:45pm
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting Chawl
Disliked
{quote} Here is my EURJPY analysis. I think price may come down deeper than you think and daily trend will probably be 'down' there confirming the monthly down trend. Even if I would take a counter trend long in monthly or weekly demand zone, I would be watchful. Monthly : SHORT Weekly: LONG Daily: LONG (but shaky) {image} {image} {image}
Ignored
EUR/JPY has a bigger picture uptrend, monthly demand in control, 3 months demand zone in control, breaking higher and higher, potential daily longs were formed and if it breaks above weekly supply zone, we could have some strong rallies towards the beginning of the last big drop.

Cheers,
ALfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,645
  • Quote
  • May 30, 2015 6:46pm May 30, 2015 6:46pm
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting SD.Trader
Disliked
{quote} Weekly and Daily TLs are descending. I agree with WS121, that ascending daily TL is not valid Let's see what Alfonso thinks... by the way, I love Alfonso. A real human. My best regards to you seor Alfonso SD.Trader
Ignored
I agree with you, weekly is in a downtrend, trendline is being respected, not a single weekly full ohcl candle closing above descending trendline.

Thanks for you kind words, doing my best to try and help those who are willing to ask and believe in the rules.
Cheers,
Alfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,646
  • Quote
  • May 30, 2015 6:47pm May 30, 2015 6:47pm
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting digitalko
Disliked
Hi, another example. Which ascending TL is correct ? IMO number 1 is correct and 2 is not correct. As per rules second valley in 1TL is not CP as the red candle closed below the blue hammers lowest low forming valley. (both TLs are broken and current TL should be drawn down as 3 CPs occured in the down move) {image}
Ignored
Correct ascending trendline is #1 because it connects the latest two peaks as per the rules my friend.
Cheers,
Alfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,647
  • Quote
  • May 31, 2015 3:22am May 31, 2015 3:22am
  •  CaptainClaw
  • | Joined Jun 2011 | Status: Member | 24 Posts
Quoting panoramia
Disliked
{quote} I don't understand your chart my friend. You upload a chart, no comments on top, no explanation on the email. That's what I would call a muted chart. Besides the zones you have drawn are all invalid, nothing to do with the rules in this thread. Alfonso
Ignored

Hello Sir. thank you for your comment. sorry for the chart. i did not post for a long time. Congratulations for the great work
 
 
  • Post #5,648
  • Quote
  • Edited 5:58am May 31, 2015 4:44am | Edited 5:58am
  •  yyc196
  • | Joined Oct 2006 | Status: PIP Sheker | 459 Posts | Online Now
Hi All,

Wanna share this trade which i traded last week.

USDCHF
********
Monthly Side market
Weekly Side Market- but Down Bias
Daily is Down Trend.
Entry by LTF
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Image1.png
Size: 154 KB
 
 
  • Post #5,649
  • Quote
  • May 31, 2015 2:34pm May 31, 2015 2:34pm
  •  digitalko
  • | Joined Oct 2014 | Status: Member | 34 Posts
Hello Alfonso and traders,
There are 3 TLs on my chart.
Are they drawn correctly in sequence 3,2,1 as they were created?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: AUDJPYmonthly.jpg
Size: 316 KB
 
 
  • Post #5,650
  • Quote
  • Jun 2, 2015 4:24am Jun 2, 2015 4:24am
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting digitalko
Disliked
Hello Alfonso and traders, There are 3 TLs on my chart. Are they drawn correctly in sequence 3,2,1 as they were created? {image}
Ignored

  1. Trendline #3 would have been valid after making that higher high, but the 1st point you used to draw it is not correct. You should have used the fractal low (white dot) of the bullish candle, not the fractal low to the left
  2. Trendline #2 would have also been valid as well but now we have an ascending TL#1, but we don't have an uptrend, we have bullish consolidation because 1 monthly demand zone has been taken out, so even though we have an ascending trendline, we don't have a monthly uptrend

Hope it makes sense!
Cheers,
Alfonso

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Screenshot1.png
Size: 297 KB
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,651
  • Quote
  • Jun 2, 2015 4:26am Jun 2, 2015 4:26am
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting yyc196
Disliked
Hi All, Wanna share this trade which i traded last week. USDCHF ******** Monthly Side market Weekly Side Market- but Down Bias Daily is Down Trend. Entry by LTF {image}
Ignored
Just a quick note on the Daily tiemframe on USD/CHF, at the moment you posted your Daily chart it was not in a downtrend, it was a bearish consolidation. Descending trendline had been broken and an ascending D1 trendline was not possible because we didn't have two valid valleys as per the rules. For a downtrend we need Daily descending trendline and 1 daily demand zone taken out.

Cheers,
Alfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,652
  • Quote
  • Jun 2, 2015 6:49am Jun 2, 2015 6:49am
  •  digitalko
  • | Joined Oct 2014 | Status: Member | 34 Posts
Hello Alfonso and all traders,
Thank you for my TLs reply.
TL1 explanation was great as I did not realize myself that TL1 is correct, but the trend is not up as demand level was taken out. Thank you.

I am attaching another tricky one. It is GU and M chart.
Is TL drawn correctly? And is the trend no more up after the demand number 5 was taken out? TL stays valid until full OHCL candle under the TL is created.

Am I correct? I hope my questions help others too.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: GU M.jpg
Size: 461 KB
 
 
  • Post #5,653
  • Quote
  • Jun 2, 2015 8:33am Jun 2, 2015 8:33am
  •  digitalko
  • | Joined Oct 2014 | Status: Member | 34 Posts
Hi all,
another example. Has anybody any ideas why the drawn levels and TLs sequence is not correct?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: AC D.jpg
Size: 497 KB
 
 
  • Post #5,654
  • Quote
  • Jun 2, 2015 11:05am Jun 2, 2015 11:05am
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting digitalko
Disliked
Hi all, another example. Has anybody any ideas why the drawn levels and TLs sequence is not correct? {image}
Ignored
All 3 trendlines in the sequence are incorrect my friend. You did not follow the rules, rules which were also mentioned in a previous post. If you break the rules it can result in unnecessary losses as well creating a wrong multiple timeframe analysis.

Apply the rules and try to upload a new screenshot of this same pair.

Cheers,
Alfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,655
  • Quote
  • Jun 2, 2015 11:06am Jun 2, 2015 11:06am
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting digitalko
Disliked
Hello Alfonso and all traders, Thank you for my TLs reply. TL1 explanation was great as I did not realize myself that TL1 is correct, but the trend is not up as demand level was taken out. Thank you. I am attaching another tricky one. It is GU and M chart. Is TL drawn correctly? And is the trend no more up after the demand number 5 was taken out? TL stays valid until full OHCL candle under the TL is created. Am I correct? I hope my questions help others too. {image}
Ignored
Monthly ascending trendline on GBP/USD is incorrect, you didn't follow the rules, you are allowed to draw an ascending trendline when you have 2 obious valleys or 3 or more consecutive CP patterns of demand.

Apply the rules and try to upload a new screenshot of this same pair.

Cheers,
Alfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Post #5,656
  • Quote
  • Jun 2, 2015 4:10pm Jun 2, 2015 4:10pm
  •  digitalko
  • | Joined Oct 2014 | Status: Member | 34 Posts
Hi Alfonso,
I am really trying hard to apply the rules and I can see that TLs are not that easy to draw correctly at least for me at this moment.
I redrawn both charts so please give me comment if I am right this time. I do no want to bother rather showing bad and good examples, the complex view on how to do it right in different scenarios and I am picking at least for me the tricky ones.
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: AC D.jpg
Size: 518 KB
Click to Enlarge

Name: GU M.jpg
Size: 472 KB
 
 
  • Post #5,657
  • Quote
  • Jun 2, 2015 5:01pm Jun 2, 2015 5:01pm
  •  Likan
  • | Joined Feb 2011 | Status: Member | 12 Posts
Quoting digitalko
Disliked
Hi Alfonso, I am really trying hard to apply the rules and I can see that TLs are not that easy to draw correctly at least for me at this moment. I redrawn both charts so please give me comment if I am right this time. I do no want to bother rather showing bad and good examples, the complex view on how to do it right in different scenarios and I am picking at least for me the tricky ones. {image} {image}
Ignored
i'm also interested :-)
 
 
  • Post #5,658
  • Quote
  • Jun 3, 2015 2:38am Jun 3, 2015 2:38am
  •  Chawl
  • | Joined Feb 2012 | Status: Member | 241 Posts
Quoting Likan
Disliked
{quote} i'm also interested :-)
Ignored
I think everyone is kind of interested here, because this is probably the most subjective subject in S&D. I watched every video even couple of times, read everything here and I'm praciting the method for not so short time but I still have doubts with trend lines especially when obviousness is not so obvious

Alfonso, I know how much rookie these questions might seem to you, but we really can't get things sometimes and need more examples

By the way, you are and what you do here is really great, thank you for your patience and great assistance.
Trade what you see..
 
 
  • Post #5,659
  • Quote
  • Jun 3, 2015 3:22am Jun 3, 2015 3:22am
  •  digitalko
  • | Joined Oct 2014 | Status: Member | 34 Posts
Quoting Chawl
Disliked
{quote} I think everyone is kind of interested here, because this is probably the most subjective subject in S&D. I watched every video even couple of times, read everything here and I'm praciting the method for not so short time but I still have doubts with trend lines especially when obviousness is not so obvious Alfonso, I know how much rookie these questions might seem to you, but we really can't get things...
Ignored
I am happy to hear that clearing TLs questions will help more of us. I propose posting tricky scenarious. I will be posting some more if it wont bother Alfonso to comment or correct us. I hope there will be some progress so I do not look like retard
 
 
  • Post #5,660
  • Quote
  • Jun 3, 2015 5:26am Jun 3, 2015 5:26am
  •  panoramia
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Aug 2011 | 3,539 Posts
Quoting digitalko
Disliked
{quote} I am happy to hear that clearing TLs questions will help more of us. I propose posting tricky scenarious. I will be posting some more if it wont bother Alfonso to comment or correct us. I hope there will be some progress so I do not look like retard
Ignored
Tricky scenarios are welcome my friend. These will help you understand the rules and how they hold over time.
Looking forward to seeing some, tricky or not tricky ones!

Cheers,
Alfonso
Set and Forget supply and demand trading community
 
 
  • Commercial Content
  • /
  • Supply and demand in a nutshell by Alfonso Moreno
  • Reply to Thread
    • 1 281282Page 283284285 486
    • 1 Page 283 486
0 traders viewing now
  • More
Top of Page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2023