EURUSD | Page 44516 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CHF

Similar Threads

MT4: how to change "EURUSD" to "#EURUSD"? 3 replies

Re: EurUsd short term 15 replies

did oanda just drop its spread for eurusd to 1 pip? 11 replies

EA for multiple lot limit order for EURUSD 0 replies

NFP nice bump up on EURUSD 2 replies

Attachments: EURUSD
Exit Attachments

EURUSD

  • #890,301
  • Apr 15, 2014 10:58am Apr 15, 2014 10:58am
Quoting gatorinla
{quote} if u were bama, would u be thinking of hurting putin. ? like selling some oil or gold reserves
the whole Ukraine situation puts Russia closer to China than before.
ignore wackos and psychos, including myself. But I can't add myself to iggy
  • #890,302
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:02am Apr 15, 2014 11:02am
Patience
  • #890,303
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:04am Apr 15, 2014 11:04am
Quoting ffleo
{quote} bama would. but Russia is making deals with China, and the transaction is in Chinese Yuan.
i doubt it. china gold demand is down. if you go back to the beginning of the U.N. the best i can see, china/russia have never voted against each other. the resolution against russia last time was vetoed by russia. for the first time ever in history, china did not vote. for or against, that was a big deal. china is between a rock and a hard place with the need to trade
those who can, do. those who cant, talk about those who can
  • #890,304
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:11am Apr 15, 2014 11:11am
Quoting attila
don't fuck with ze Russians.. if this is how they lite their cigs.. {image}
I don't see any difference between Russia and US. Moreover US was more violent than Russia.

==================
US has no right to talk about Russia while US govt. is democracy covered human killer while Russia didn't kill anyone.
But Russia took Ukrainian land that US never did but US wisely sucked most important natural resources.
==================

The world will be much better without these crap super powers. They are abusing power in every step.
You cannot learn better without losing
  • #890,305
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:13am Apr 15, 2014 11:13am
Quoting gatorinla
{quote} i doubt it. china gold demand is down. if you go back to the beginning of the U.N. the best i can see, china/russia have never voted against each other. the resolution against russia last time was vetoed by russia. for the first time ever in history, china did not vote. for or against, that was a big deal. china is between a rock and a hard place with the need to trade
China also had a close connection with the former Ukraine government (they helped some China military equipment development). Unless the current government voids all the ongoing projects, China probably wont vote against Ukraine. So China keeps neutral.
ignore wackos and psychos, including myself. But I can't add myself to iggy
  • #890,306
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:14am Apr 15, 2014 11:14am
Quoting forexings
{quote} I don't see any difference between Russia and US. Moreover US was more violent than Russia. ================== US has no right to talk about Russia while US govt. is democracy covered human killer while Russia didn't kill anyone. But Russia took Ukrainian land that US never did but US wisely sucked most important natural resources. ================== The world will be much better without these crap super powers. They are abusing power in every step.
I agree. They both live in the 17th century. Complete Bull Shit. On the other hand, I prefer one of these two vs. China. Just saying..
  • #890,307
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:15am Apr 15, 2014 11:15am
At Slovjansk and Kramatorsk the 45. russian air brigade passed the border and stepped on Ukrainian land!!!
  • #890,308
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:15am Apr 15, 2014 11:15am
Quoting noom0121
{quote} about dis time 2012 similar thing happened and the gap never close. caution please. GL
May be or may be not. We must have a big reason to go down gradually.

This time no hell overbuy that French banks did in 2k12. Monthly TF looks decent, Weekly TF more bullish.
We need a reason for big down like 2009
You cannot learn better without losing
  • #890,309
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:17am Apr 15, 2014 11:17am
Quoting attila
{quote} I agree. They both live in the 17th century. Complete Bull Shit. On the other hand, I prefer one of these two vs. China. Just saying..
Problem is if these two are doing something stupid, China will rule.. And that would suck major ass.
  • #890,310
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:18am Apr 15, 2014 11:18am
Quoting gatorinla
{quote} i doubt it. china gold demand is down. if you go back to the beginning of the U.N. the best i can see, china/russia have never voted against each other. the resolution against russia last time was vetoed by russia. for the first time ever in history, china did not vote. for or against, that was a big deal. china is between a rock and a hard place with the need to trade

China uses sparely it's veto power (less than 10 times, I don't have the exact number in the whole history on UN), and only when it's own interest is at stake. In other cases it usually go neutral (abstention).
Don't be smart. Be rich.
  • #890,311
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:18am Apr 15, 2014 11:18am
Quoting BlazeHun
At Slovjansk and Kramatorsk the 45. russian air brigade passed the border and stepped on Ukrainian land!!!
source?
  • #890,312
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:20am Apr 15, 2014 11:20am
Quoting ffleo
{quote} China also had a close connection with the former Ukraine government (they helped some China military equipment development). Unless the current government voids all the ongoing projects, China probably wont vote against Ukraine. So China keeps neutral.
with customers in the u.s. and europe china is hands off.. and if the customers do sanctions against russian raw materials. then the customers will not buy products made from them and it may cause problems for china. neutral is better for them, even if they want oil/etc. plus they are already in a financial crises
those who can, do. those who cant, talk about those who can
  • #890,313
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:23am Apr 15, 2014 11:23am
Quoting attila
{quote} Problem is if these two are doing something stupid, China will rule.. And that would suck major ass.
Sure, they are patiently waiting...
Don't be smart. Be rich.
  • #890,314
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:23am Apr 15, 2014 11:23am
Quoting maximinus
{quote} China uses sparely it's veto power (less than 10 times, I don't have the exact number in the whole history on UN), and only when it's own interest is at stake. In other cases it usually go neutral (abstention).
when did they not vote with russia in the past, when it was about russia or china?
those who can, do. those who cant, talk about those who can
  • #890,315
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:24am Apr 15, 2014 11:24am
Quoting attila
{quote} Problem is if these two are doing something stupid, China will rule.. And that would suck major ass.
Yeah, that's why US doesn't like competitor China. Cannot break them physically but trying economically.
You cannot learn better without losing
  • #890,316
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:27am Apr 15, 2014 11:27am
...not impossible to carry on down with a shap short before going realy high, so watch out ! -)
Quoting Miguel.N
{quote} ...with this today closing candel it's not nice to short, even though we may see that for the next weeks !? ...it's better to wait monday london opening to be sure! ...have good weekend guys, bye! {image}
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image1.png Size: 27 KB
  • #890,317
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:27am Apr 15, 2014 11:27am
Quoting gatorinla
{quote} when did they not vote with russia in the past?

They never voted against russia, but they rarely vetoed with russia, they prefer the abstention. If you want the exact number, I've to find them in the old docs in my archives. But I've no doubt about it. Will give you the info later.
Don't be smart. Be rich.
  • #890,318
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:27am Apr 15, 2014 11:27am
Quoting forexings
{quote} Yeah, that's why US doesn't like competitor China. Cannot break them physically but trying economically.
As of right now U.S. can still break them whichever way it wants... Will that be the case in the future? Following the current course of action, probably not..
  • #890,319
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:27am Apr 15, 2014 11:27am
mario ""The strengthening of the exchange rate would require further monetary policy accommodation. If you want policy to remain as accommodative as now, a further strengthening of the exchange rate would require further stimulus "
twitter: @gettoefl
  • #890,320
  • Apr 15, 2014 11:30am Apr 15, 2014 11:30am
Quoting maximinus
{quote} They never voted against russia, but they rarely vetoed with russia. If you want the exact number, I've to find them in the old docs in my archives. But I've no doubt about it. Will give you the info later.
that was my point in the original post. when it concerned one of the 2. they voted in tandem. not against each other or a non vote.
those who can, do. those who cant, talk about those who can
1,484 traders viewing now