Do you believe this market is random? | Page 3 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Is random really random? 231 replies

Market Random and Predictable Parts 26 replies

Pro Traders in a Random Market 60 replies

Is the market random or not ? 210 replies

Random Market vs Set Expectancy 8 replies

Attachments: Do you believe this market is random?
Exit Attachments

Do you believe this market is random?

  • #41
  • Nov 6, 2013 10:47am Nov 6, 2013 10:47am
Quoting Gwan
if price want to go from 1 to 5, it will pass 2,3,4, before it can reach 5 this rule it self will limit whatever randomness we will find.
exctly what im saying. Everything must follow the rules and laws it exist in. So there are parameters to the randomness that have a beginning and end, therefore making it not random since its actually a slave to the rules of the situation it exist in.
The Meek Shall Inherit The Earth...
  • #42
  • Nov 6, 2013 11:10am Nov 6, 2013 11:10am
Hell no!
Founder of Sutherland Wave Principle
  • #43
  • Nov 6, 2013 11:36am Nov 6, 2013 11:36am
Price reacts to certain areas for a reason.
  • #44
  • Nov 6, 2013 11:39am Nov 6, 2013 11:39am
Banks and hedge funds buy and sell currencies, these entities provide order flow which moves price. Looking at round numbers, longer term charts, like the daily and weekly. You can see areas that are respected and patterns that repeat themselves over and over. So, movements can be predicted fairly accurately with good technical skills and knowledge. There is dynamics to price movements and you can generally rely on the knowledge of these dynamics along with good
discipline to have a good idea where price is headed.
  • #45
  • Nov 6, 2013 11:43am Nov 6, 2013 11:43am
I like to look at clean charts with no indicators, it lets me see clearer. What I am trying to say is price fluctuates because of order flow, if you can identify
pivot points, strong areas, and momentum of buying and selling. You can begin to have an idea of likely direction. There is no certainties, but probabilities.
  • #46
  • Edited 1:41pm Nov 6, 2013 11:57am | Edited 1:41pm
This is a very difficult question to answer convincingly but I will have a go.

The market is not random and you can find plenty of evidence to support this, a quick google search provides copious amounts of material debunking myths like the EMH and other academic theories trying to quantify the unquantifiable. However, the basis for this conclusion is understandable due to the frustrating reality which is the market is very difficult to predict. Without making it out to be more than it is and describing the market as some form of deity, put simply, it's just lots of different people doing lots of different types of transactions collectively, that's it. It's very hard to anticipate these transactions because they are so varied in size, quantity and reason... and for these reasons and through a process of exasperation, people conclude it's something more than this.
  • #47
  • Nov 6, 2013 11:58am Nov 6, 2013 11:58am
Quoting Porkpie
Essentially, the market is a mirror of human behaviour which at times is seemingly random and chaotic. However, once you put humans under particular types of stress, then the behaviour becomes more predictable. To illustrate this, a fire alarm goes off in the cinema, what are most people likely to do? With the market, a news item is positive for for the $, the market spikes showing $ strength what are people most likely to do? Or the market makes a yearly high, what are most people likely to do? Couple this with the socio-economic engineering by...
I like this explanation. I agree, if you know what to look for, where and when to look it becomes less random.
  • #48
  • Nov 6, 2013 12:02pm Nov 6, 2013 12:02pm
Quoting diceman555
I would like to have a poll on this topic but not sure how to do that. DO YOU BELIEVE THIS MARKET IS RANDOM , ????
Ben Graham: "in the short term, the stock market behaves like a voting machine, but in the long term it acts like a weighing machine"

Obviously the market in the long-term will reflect fundamentals, but in the short-term it is rather random.
  • #49
  • Nov 6, 2013 12:13pm Nov 6, 2013 12:13pm
Randomness doesnt exist in universe.
even the outcome of Dice and coin toss is not random.

As far as the cause and effect law of universe holds true , nothing is random.
  • #50
  • Nov 6, 2013 12:22pm Nov 6, 2013 12:22pm
Quoting Custos
{quote} Ben Graham: "in the short term, the stock market behaves like a voting machine, but in the long term it acts like a weighing machine" Obviously the market in the long-term will reflect fundamentals, but in the short-term it is rather random.
I completely disagree...
its like foundation or building blocks are completely random...but when u combine those random building blocks you create pattern out of it.

You cant create order out of chaos.
  • #51
  • Nov 6, 2013 12:27pm Nov 6, 2013 12:27pm
Quoting ronaleo10
Randomness doesnt exist in universe. even the outcome of Dice and coin toss is not random. As far as the cause and effect law of universe holds true , nothing is random.
you should read some steven hawking books, my friend. The universe has three main features, that helped define its shape: randomness, gravity and imperfection.
With these inputs, computer models show you how galaxies developed out of randomly distributed matter and energy. It always strikes me how some people can make so many unqualified statements without a bit of research. But I guess that's how we grow up, right?
  • #52
  • Nov 6, 2013 12:43pm Nov 6, 2013 12:43pm
Quoting Custos
{quote} you should read some steven hawking books, my friend. The universe has three main features, that helped define its shape: randomness, gravity and imperfection. With these inputs, computer models show you how galaxies developed out of randomly distributed matter and energy. It always strikes me how some people can make so many unqualified statements without a bit of research. But I guess that's how we grow up, right?


Well it will take a very long debate and time to prove my point ....and i am not interested in that...
You can believe what you want .

I would like to post thought provoking quote by french mathematician , on whose principal the chaos theory was formed by Edward norton lorenz.

If we knew exactly the laws of nature and the situation of the universe at the initial moment, we could predict exactly the situation of the same universe at a succeeding moment.
Henri Poincare
  • #53
  • Nov 6, 2013 12:51pm Nov 6, 2013 12:51pm
Quoting Custos
{quote} you should read some steven hawking books, my friend. The universe has three main features, that helped define its shape: randomness, gravity and imperfection. With these inputs, computer models show you how galaxies developed out of randomly distributed matter and energy. It always strikes me how some people can make so many unqualified statements without a bit of research. But I guess that's how we grow up, right?
research into what? into the mind of stupid people? if 1 million scientists say something that doesn't make it right. that is called common sence and it is derived from errors of judgement which have been made in the past. you can't predict the trajectory of some sub-particle? so what? newtonian physics can predict a lot of shit. people can predict a lot of shit also. custos when you go ahead and push your statistics agenda and philosophy please don't call it science. it's philosophy and in some cases is religion. i'm out.
  • #54
  • Nov 6, 2013 12:57pm Nov 6, 2013 12:57pm
Quoting ronaleo10
{quote} If we knew exactly the laws of nature and the situation of the universe at the initial moment, we could predict exactly the situation of the same universe at a succeeding moment.[/url] Henri Poincare
And Einstein came along to upset that apple cart...
  • #55
  • Nov 6, 2013 1:00pm Nov 6, 2013 1:00pm
Quoting diceman555
I would like to have a poll on this topic

Why don't you add a poll then?
  • #56
  • Nov 6, 2013 1:03pm Nov 6, 2013 1:03pm
Quoting deltatrade
{quote} research into what? into the mind of stupid people?
well, if you think stephen hawking's work is stupid then you are beyond help
Quoting deltatrade
if 1 million scientists say something that doesn't make it right.
it makes it right until one can disprove them. That's what science is about.
Quoting deltatrade
custos when you go ahead and push your statistics agenda and philosophy please don't call it science.
I am not sure where I pushed my statistics agenda and I called science what a leading theoretical physicist says, not my humble attempts.
  • #57
  • Nov 6, 2013 1:12pm Nov 6, 2013 1:12pm
Quoting numbnuts
In the short term I believe price is close enough to random that any predictability is short lived. If price really moves in patterns, or waves, those patterns will be quickly cashed in on and smashed by big money traders until randomness returns. Short term order flow is driven not so much by forex speculators but also by foreign trade, importers/exporters settling accounts and purchasing supplies, financial institutions and investors trading $$$ for stocks, bonds etc. Most players in the currency market can't even spell forex. If some japanese...

Agreed.
  • #58
  • Nov 6, 2013 1:20pm Nov 6, 2013 1:20pm
Quoting Custos
{quote} well, if you think stephen hawking's work is stupid then you are beyond help {quote}
did hawking discover something extraorinary?no. he's a puppet in a wheel chair. i'd go with einstein on the nature of the deterministic universe. he did not even had a tv and he predicted something fantastic. and also the role of imagination in making new discoveries in science.
  • #59
  • Nov 6, 2013 2:00pm Nov 6, 2013 2:00pm
Quoting deltatrade
{quote} did hawking discover something extraorinary?no. he's a puppet in a wheel chair. i'd go with einstein on the nature of the deterministic universe. he did not even had a tv and he predicted something fantastic. and also the role of imagination in making new discoveries in science.
Considering Stephen Hawking and Einstein's incredible high IQs, I doubt any of us here is in a position to fully judge their lifework.

I can say one thing though. All the electronic stuff we take for granted today would not exist without quantum mechanics, which goes directly against Einstein's core belief on a universe ruled by deterministic laws. This discussion being via internet would not be possible were Einstein right and Bohr wrong.
"To hold, you must first open your hand. Let go." - Lao Tzu
  • #60
  • Nov 6, 2013 2:58pm Nov 6, 2013 2:58pm
Quoting vox dei
{quote} All the electronic stuff we take for granted today would not exist without quantum mechanics, which goes directly against Einstein's core belief on a universe ruled by deterministic laws.
the internet and electronics stuff work . if the universe was truly random it would not be so. also it would be wiser to respect results and not iq. you can surely expect an iq to perform but what if a lower intelect is more efficient you have to respect that.
0 traders viewing now