Some of you are expressing concern that the hedge is not being reliably constructed via real trades.
With Phantom_AddSix_02, it should be more of a concern than with 01.
With Phantom_AddSix_01, all that's required to open a trade on a pair is for its phantom trade to be positive.
However, with ver 02, a pair must have distinguished itself as a biggest phantom winner among all 14 pairs before it will be traded. No, I'm not going to whittle down to tracking only the 6 pairs. It seems to me that we shouldn't be worried about trading the other side of the hedge until some of those pairs move strongly enough to distinguish themselves as biggest winners among the larger basket. When my theory is proven wrong, I'll come up with EAs that deal with it.
I have not tried to make myself the policeman over the noise occurring on the thread, but there is quite a bit. The main reason I don't is because it's not my place to do it. Also, traders can learn from seeing theories put to the test. We all like the freedom to test our ideas openly. I have strong opinions so when I express them I hope they don't discourage a free exchange of ideas.
Yes I feel you should at least try mightily to figure out how to code an idea if you believe in it. If you think the idea could make you into a millionaire, why wouldn't you invest the blood, sweat and tears into mastering this little MQ4 programming language? I know it's not easy but I deeply respect those who at least try. Frazerd earned my utmost respect through his coding efforts and through his relentless objective analysis of trading results. I ponder his suggestions carefully since I know he spends much time observing, thinking and sharing his analysis.
It's easy to ask me to implement your ideas but I do my own independent thinking based mostly on data (trading statements) presented on the thread, and only rarely based on someone's suggestions.
______
Next topic -- getting the settings right.
I'm a US trader so I'm stuck with US brokers. I test with 50:1 leverage.
Based on statements I'm seeing, including my own, I'm going to start using
0.67 for MaxMarginToUse and 1.0 for ProfitPct. This applies only the the NON-taz Phantom_AddSix EAs.
If I run out of margin with those settings, I'll adjust those two settings downward, proportionally, until my margin is staying safe -- 500% or better is nice.
I'd probably adjust the settings downward as follows.
MaxMarginToUse at 0.335 and ProfitPct at 0.5
MaxMarginToUse at 0.1675 and ProfitPct at 0.25
You may want to try other values but what I'm suggesting is to keep the MaxMarginToUse / ProfitPct ratio at about 0.67.
With Phantom_AddSix_02, it should be more of a concern than with 01.
With Phantom_AddSix_01, all that's required to open a trade on a pair is for its phantom trade to be positive.
However, with ver 02, a pair must have distinguished itself as a biggest phantom winner among all 14 pairs before it will be traded. No, I'm not going to whittle down to tracking only the 6 pairs. It seems to me that we shouldn't be worried about trading the other side of the hedge until some of those pairs move strongly enough to distinguish themselves as biggest winners among the larger basket. When my theory is proven wrong, I'll come up with EAs that deal with it.
I have not tried to make myself the policeman over the noise occurring on the thread, but there is quite a bit. The main reason I don't is because it's not my place to do it. Also, traders can learn from seeing theories put to the test. We all like the freedom to test our ideas openly. I have strong opinions so when I express them I hope they don't discourage a free exchange of ideas.
Yes I feel you should at least try mightily to figure out how to code an idea if you believe in it. If you think the idea could make you into a millionaire, why wouldn't you invest the blood, sweat and tears into mastering this little MQ4 programming language? I know it's not easy but I deeply respect those who at least try. Frazerd earned my utmost respect through his coding efforts and through his relentless objective analysis of trading results. I ponder his suggestions carefully since I know he spends much time observing, thinking and sharing his analysis.
It's easy to ask me to implement your ideas but I do my own independent thinking based mostly on data (trading statements) presented on the thread, and only rarely based on someone's suggestions.
______
Next topic -- getting the settings right.
I'm a US trader so I'm stuck with US brokers. I test with 50:1 leverage.
Based on statements I'm seeing, including my own, I'm going to start using
0.67 for MaxMarginToUse and 1.0 for ProfitPct. This applies only the the NON-taz Phantom_AddSix EAs.
If I run out of margin with those settings, I'll adjust those two settings downward, proportionally, until my margin is staying safe -- 500% or better is nice.
I'd probably adjust the settings downward as follows.
MaxMarginToUse at 0.335 and ProfitPct at 0.5
MaxMarginToUse at 0.1675 and ProfitPct at 0.25
You may want to try other values but what I'm suggesting is to keep the MaxMarginToUse / ProfitPct ratio at about 0.67.
Open to new approaches.