Sonic R. System | Page 204 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Sonic R.evolution 95 replies

The System Behind the System, by Merlin Jeffries 16 replies

Old School Sonic System + Other Things 11 replies

Knife system, Vegas 4h system related questions. 4 replies

Would you trade this system? New system #2. 10 replies

Attachments: Sonic R. System
Exit Attachments

Sonic R. System

  • #4,061
  • Jul 23, 2009 12:14am Jul 23, 2009 12:14am
Here we go.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: here we go.jpg Size: 347 KB
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,062
  • Jul 23, 2009 12:28am Jul 23, 2009 12:28am
Quoting Rastaman
Here we go.
How do you "read" this oscillator? Is it suggesting that volumes are highest at the extremes of its swings, or that they are weakest at these extremes, or that they are strongest at the tops and weakest at the bottoms......????????
  • #4,063
  • Edited 1:09am Jul 23, 2009 12:56am | Edited 1:09am
Here you go.

http://www.forexrealm.com/forex-arti...scillator.html

It also seems to work with divergence and warn us of a possible trend change. Like we have right now.


Closed 0.2 lots of 0.4 and am letting the rest run after BE.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: exit.jpg Size: 173 KB
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,064
  • Jul 23, 2009 1:15am Jul 23, 2009 1:15am
Quoting Rastaman
Here you go.

http://www.forexrealm.com/forex-arti...scillator.html

It also seems to work with divergence and warn us of a possible trend change. Like we have right now.


Closed 0.2 lots of 0.4 and am letting the rest run after BE.
Well, I read and re-read the article....all of it. But nowhere does it say specifically how to "read" the oscillator line! What does it mean when it peaks up.....peaks down.....is near center....?????????
  • #4,065
  • Edited 1:33am Jul 23, 2009 1:21am | Edited 1:33am
Quoting traderathome
Well, I read and re-read the article....all of it. But nowhere does it say specifically how to "read" the oscillator line! What does it mean when it peaks up.....peaks down.....is near center....?????????

It is basically a volume indicator.
When it crosses zero there is more buying volume than selling volume.
In the trade above, I was just using the divergence between the volume and the PA.

As the trend on this pair has been up on all major TF today, it was a sitting duck.
Just like USD/CHF is going to be a sitting duck come the London open. HOPEFULLY!
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: USDCHF.jpg Size: 205 KB
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,066
  • Jul 23, 2009 1:36am Jul 23, 2009 1:36am
Quoting traderathome
EU Daily: John Bollinger says many times PA 'Head Fakes' out of a Bollinger Band pinch. Then the PA reverses across the pinch and proceeds to make the true move. So, I wonder if this will turn out to be a Double Top, or "M" configuration. Fib extensions applied to the pinch span provide popular targets of 100%, 162%, 262% and 424%......depending upon the strength of the run. The "M" has a depth of about 591 pips, and if PA falls it should double that. That favors the 262% area.
Comments welcomed.
Indeed...
among others, Volume &/or divergence from oscillators such as Trix & CCI in your chart (as well as Stoch, MACD, RSI, etc) can alert us of PA's real direction & hence, if a Head fake will occur or not.
Indeed, the Trix & CCI in your chart are showing bearish divergences.. which may mean we may be in for a head fake soon.
  • #4,067
  • Edited 1:47am Jul 23, 2009 1:36am | Edited 1:47am
Quoting Rastaman
It is basically a volume indicator.
When it crosses zero there is more buying volume than selling volume.
In the trade above, I was just using the divergence between the volume and the PA.

As the trend on this pair has been up on all major TF today, it was a sitting duck.
Just like USD/CHF is going to be a sitting duck come the London open.
I have shunned the Accumulation/Distribution indicators because they, as is therefore the Chaikin Oscillator, are based upon an erroneous assumption.....that being that they can assume, based upon risingfalling close/open prices and rising/falling volume, whether there was a predominance of buying or selling during the timeframe. It is a ridiculous assumption. Many times I have noticed heavy volume at the low of a timeframe and then a spike up on low volume to close at a new high, a condition in which they would assume buying. But, in fact it was heavy selling and then a 'head fake up', if you will, on low volume to make the tall green candle and heavy overall volume appear as buying.....and confirmed by a subsequent heavy dive, dive, dive! The ONLY sure way to consistently know, in fact, whether there was more buying than selling, or visa vera, is to know the actual count of trades/volumes of each catagory as they go thru the system.....data that is unavailable to us in forex as well as in the stock market (although I imagine that in the stock market, that data is available to certain "qualified" large brokerages, Mutual funds, and hedge funds).
  • #4,068
  • Jul 23, 2009 1:40am Jul 23, 2009 1:40am
It is funny but after what Sonic said in his last post, it was much easier to identify the USD/GBP entry on the M5 than either the M15 or H1.

I guess that we can only understand these things with a little Zen whack on the back of the head!
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,069
  • Jul 23, 2009 1:50am Jul 23, 2009 1:50am
TAH

You are using the NOV indicator so just compare the two indicators.
I personally find the NOV indicator confusing because it is simply not directional and has me going in both directions at the same time.

Note how the Chaikin oscillator shows us divergence at critical areas whereas the NOV does not.

It is just a case of, different folks different strokes.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Untitled-1.jpg Size: 123 KB
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,070
  • Jul 23, 2009 1:53am Jul 23, 2009 1:53am
Quoting Rastaman
TAH

You are using the NOV indicator so just compare the two indicators.
I personally find the NOV indicator confusing because it is simply not directional and has me going in both directions at the same time.
Post the Chaikin indy. I will include it on a chart and start comparing it with the NVO.
  • #4,071
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:02am Jul 23, 2009 2:02am
Quoting Rastaman
....
I personally find the NOV indicator confusing because it is simply not directional and has me going in both directions at the same time.
Note how the Chaikin oscillator shows us divergence at critical areas whereas the NOV does not.
It is just a case of, different folks different strokes.
Yes, to each his own.
But i think it's fairly incorrect &/or unfair to say that NOV, or any volume indicator for that matter, is/are confusing, not directional. Volume indicators are directional. they just need more interpretation (& experience) for u to gain insight from them, compared to oscillators that point-blank show/tell u the direction (up, down, o/bought, o/sold).
& also, Volume indicators show divergence too.

Just FYI, so u wont think i'm biased, i'm using (& still learning to use; learning is endless) volume indicators. I'm not using NOV, but i plan to check up on it soon.
  • #4,072
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:02am Jul 23, 2009 2:02am
Quoting traderathome
Post the Chaikin indy. I will include it on a chart and start comparing it with the NVO.
Okidoki
Attached File(s)
File Type: mq4 CHO.mq4   3 KB | 535 downloads
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,073
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:04am Jul 23, 2009 2:04am
Now Pips Are Negative. Let's See What Will Happen Next
1.0940 Is Dangarous Area ...

Regards,
Basber
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: ucad.gif Size: 39 KB
Trading methods are designed to put the odds in our favor, not predicting.
  • #4,074
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:05am Jul 23, 2009 2:05am
Quoting Rastaman
TAH

You are using the NOV indicator so just compare the two indicators.
I personally find the NOV indicator confusing because it is simply not directional and has me going in both directions at the same time.

Note how the Chaikin oscillator shows us divergence at critical areas whereas the NOV does not.

It is just a case of, different folks different strokes.
If you post the indy, I will compare. But from the chart your posted, look at the next to last NVO relative volume hit, was buying that turned the PA back upwards. Chaikin was below axis and therefore indicated selling. Then look at last NVO relative volume hit....was as the PA went up to highs and quickly dropped from there. Was a pump to sell off at the highs, but Chaikin was above axis and therefore indicated it was buying!

Edit: Ok, got the indy. Thanks. Will start comparing......but please continue to post your insights using this tool, as I am new to it.
  • #4,075
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:05am Jul 23, 2009 2:05am
Quoting supremeChaos
Yes, to each his own.
But i think it's fairly incorrect &/or unfair to say that NOV, or any volume indicator for that matter, is/are confusing, not directional. Volume indicators are directional. they just need more interpretation (& experience) for u to gain insight from them, compared to oscillators that point-blank show/tell u the direction (up, down, o/bought, o/sold).
& also, Volume indicators show divergence too.

Just FYI, so u wont think i'm biased, i'm using (& still learning to use; learning is endless) volume...
And, just why would it be unfair for ME to say NOV is confusing for ME personally after trying to use it? Isn't this a personal decision to be made?

There is a lot going on the charts, watching PA, trend tunnel, MA etc, I just need one less thing to focus on and have me standing on my head to try to think which way the volume is moving.

Hey, I don't care if nobody else on the planet likes this indicator, I DO!!!!!!!
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,076
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:30am Jul 23, 2009 2:30am
Anyone else of the opinion that we are seeing a fake out on USD/CHF right now? The trend is strongly down on all major TF.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: fake out.jpg Size: 187 KB
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,077
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:30am Jul 23, 2009 2:30am
Quote
I personally find the NOV indicator confusing because it is simply not directional and has me going in both directions at the same time.
Rastaman,
U said this in your above/previous post.
Confusing? ok, granted, i'll give that to u, no problem.
but if u read that whole sentence, in context, u were generalizing that NVO is not directional.
traderathome can interpret NVO, u can't. the same way that u can interpret Chaikin & he can't.
if NVO was not directional (literally &/or figuratively speaking), what's the point of him using it, right?

like i said, i'm not versed with NVO. maybe traderathome can point out "directionals" &/or divergences via NVO on the chart you posted here (containing the above quote).

we just have to note that there are many readers here, & some might take your above insight at face value and/or miscontrue it & "spread the word", so to speak. that is my only concern. nothing more, nothing less.
so, there's definitely no need for "!!!!!!!!!!" in your post.
I have been gentle, so i expect u to behave the same.

btw, I know summer's hot now in Japan. no need to accentuate it within your post. your Chinese wife will thank me if u heed my advice to cool down. what do u say?
  • #4,078
  • Edited 2:46am Jul 23, 2009 2:34am | Edited 2:46am
Quoting Rastaman
And, just why would it be unfair for ME to say NOV is confusing for ME personally after trying to use it? Isn't this a personal decision to be made?

There is a lot going on the charts, watching PA, trend tunnel, MA etc, I just need one less thing to focus on and have me standing on my head to try to think which way the volume is moving.

Hey, I don't care if nobody else on the planet likes this indicator, I DO!!!!!!!
Rastaman, I set up NVO to not show the 'below average' volumes, which gives it a level base. Then I 'dragged and dropped' the CHO indy on top of it. This way of setting up the two studies easily allows interpretation of whether the NVO relative volume spikes are 'buying or selling' as however the CHO is indicating at the same time. This should be interesting. You might try it too. The two together this way may become more revealing. Let's see........

Edit: Added second chart in which the yellow bars were changed to the same color as the 'below avg' bars, to make them less distinguishable and therefore, make the higher volume graduation colors more outstanding. Just an example of a way to tweek the NVO indy.
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot # 012.gif Size: 31 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot # 013.gif Size: 30 KB
  • #4,079
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:40am Jul 23, 2009 2:40am
Quoting supremeChaos
Rastaman,
U said this in your above/previous post.
Confusing? ok, granted, i'll give that to u, no problem.
but if u read that whole sentence, in context, u were generalizing that NVO is not directional.
traderathome can interpret NVO, u can't. the same way that u can interpret Chaikin & he can't.
if NVO was not directional (literally &/or figuratively speaking), what's the point of him using it, right?

like i said, i'm not versed with NVO. maybe traderathome can point out "directionals" &/or divergences via NVO on the chart you posted...
I have never suggested anyone use this indicator, Trader at home ASKED me to post it. So, why don't you Chill Out Man!
Starting to see instead of just looking.
  • #4,080
  • Jul 23, 2009 2:42am Jul 23, 2009 2:42am
Quoting traderathome
Rastaman, I set up NVO to not show the 'below average' volumes, which gives it a level base. Then I 'dragged and dropped' the CHO indy on top of it. This way of setting up the two studies easily allows interpretation of whether the NVO relative volume spikes are 'buying or selling' as however the CHO is indicating at the same time. This should be interesting. You might try it too. The two together this way may become more revealing. Lets see........

I did that yesterday and sort of got fed up with it.
I agree, it is an interesting idea though.

Hey, we had better keep quiet about this indi or we will be crucified, AGAIN!!!

But hey, look how the divergence screams at you.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot # 012.gif Size: 33 KB
Starting to see instead of just looking.
52 traders viewing now