Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

The 4 Hour Fozzy Method 233 replies

FOZZY Method CROSSES 808 replies

Fozzy Alt... one more approach to the Daily Fozzy Method 40 replies

My Daily Fozzy Trades 337 replies

Monthly Fozzy Method 9 replies

Attachments: The Daily Fozzy Method
Exit Attachments

The Daily Fozzy Method

Sometimes.................

To become familiar with how it reacts to price change, try a forward test by either marking your chart each time the color changes as it crosses the "0" line and then observing the results or take a "screenshot" everyday for the same analysis. This indicator is useful with this method when applied as discussed earlier in this thread. When used on smaller time frames and charts, it will often give false signals because it repaints. Although I have found interesting results when used on a 4 hour chart.


Quoting willf
Doesn't the Solar Wind repaint itself when a new bar opens?

It always looks good backtesting but forward testing the current bar can change depending on the next bar.
I ran into this thread and was interested in the system so I started reading through this long thread. I donwloaded the EA on the other thread and ran the MT4 analyzer from 1/2004 to 1/2007 and I got this:

Bars in test 2052
Ticks modelled 28206
Modelling quality 50.00%
Initial deposit 10000.00
Total net profit 31628.66
Gross profit 106373.61
Gross loss -74744.95
Profit factor 1.42
Expected payoff 140.57
Absolute drawdown 0.00
Maximal drawdown 11356.11 (33.07%)
Relative drawdown 33.07% (11356.11)
Total trades 225
Short positions (won %) 116 (78.45%)
Long positions (won %) 109 (74.31%)
Profit trades (% of total) 172 (76.44%)
Loss trades (% of total) 53 (23.56%)
Largest
profit trade 2601.19
loss trade -2400.00
Average
profit trade 618.45
loss trade -1410.28
Maximum
consecutive wins (profit in money) 20 (10095.95)
consecutive losses (loss in money) 4 (-4761.24)
Maximal
consecutive profit (count of wins) 10095.95 (20)
consecutive loss (count of losses) -5280.00 (3)
Average
consecutive wins 5
consecutive losses 1

This looks fairly impressive. I know the tester in Mt4 does not have a good reputation but have seen other systems tested and the results from MT4 posted as proof. Has anyone tested this manually and received similar results?
migamb.............I know there's a lot to read in this thread, but if you take the time and at least "look" at all the posts, your question will evaporate. You'll learn all you need to know about this method and will probably start trading it profitably like many of us already do. (Take a look at my posted results from last Fall)


Quoting migamb
I ran into this thread and was interested in the system so I started reading through this long thread. I donwloaded the EA on the other thread and ran the MT4 analyzer from 1/2004 to 1/2007 and I got this:

Bars in test 2052
Ticks modelled 28206
Modelling quality 50.00%
Initial deposit 10000.00
Total net profit 31628.66
Gross profit 106373.61
Gross loss -74744.95
Profit factor 1.42
Expected payoff 140.57
Absolute drawdown 0.00
Maximal drawdown 11356.11 (33.07%)
Relative drawdown 33.07% (11356.11)
Total trades 225
Short positions (won %) 116 (78.45%)
Long positions (won %) 109 (74.31%)
Profit trades (% of total) 172 (76.44%)
Loss trades (% of total) 53 (23.56%)
Largest
profit trade 2601.19
loss trade -2400.00
Average
profit trade 618.45
loss trade -1410.28
Maximum
consecutive wins (profit in money) 20 (10095.95)
consecutive losses (loss in money) 4 (-4761.24)
Maximal
consecutive profit (count of wins) 10095.95 (20)
consecutive loss (count of losses) -5280.00 (3)
Average
consecutive wins 5
consecutive losses 1

This looks fairly impressive. I know the tester in Mt4 does not have a good reputation but have seen other systems tested and the results from MT4 posted as proof. Has anyone tested this manually and received similar results?
The USDCHF seems to have an entry coming in today. Here is the chart. Am I correct that on the open of today's candle would be the entry since the cross happened between today's and yesterday's candle?

http://forexfactory.com/attachment.p...1&d=1168978918
Attached Image
Quoting migamb
The USDCHF seems to have an entry coming in today. Here is the chart. Am I correct that on the open of today's candle would be the entry since the cross happened between today's and yesterday's candle?

http://forexfactory.com/attachment.p...1&d=1168978918

If the cross is confirmed by today's close, you will enter at the open of tomorrow, as I write the cross is appearing and disappearing.

There are other variations of the method, for example one is to wait for the coss of 50 level line to trigger a trade.
Regards
My experience with trading and following this method is to avoid crosses when the lines are "hugging" which is the case with the UC. It does seems like this pair is ready for a retracement. I like sharp angles with my fozzies.
Trade what you see - Not what you think
After doing more research I noticed I had the 8MA set as simple and saw that it needed to be exponential. This takes the cross away. Thanks for the feedback, I like this method so far.
I read many posts with people using SMA and others using EMA for the 8 MA period. The people that have tested which one is more accurate? Just asking because there seems to be a substantial difference between the two.
Some forward testing 06th december until today
Attached Images
migamb brings up a good question: SMA or EMA?
my question is: is the MA applied to the Open, Close, or which? I notice it makes a big difference in the charting of the line, the angle.

I have not found this detail in any of the FOZZY threads and would appreciate it if you could share this detail of your setup with everybody.

thanks to all for a fantastic set of threads -

go fozzy!
Just Trade.
Yes

i would like to know also if we are to use the simple or the exponential ma?
Thanks for such a great system, i've been incorporating Steviets system with this one and I am getting great results with catching and riding trends and minimizing my losses.

Dave
Quoting freemark
migamb brings up a good question: SMA or EMA?
my question is: is the MA applied to the Open, Close, or which? I notice it makes a big difference in the charting of the line, the angle.

I have not found this detail in any of the FOZZY threads and would appreciate it if you could share this detail of your setup with everybody.

thanks to all for a fantastic set of threads -

go fozzy!
In the earlier posts of this thread Fozzy says he uses EMA applied to the RSI (First Indicators Data).
Attached Image
I am still pretty green at using the Fozzy system but have read through the thread a few times and believe that the original Fozzy uses the EMA applied to the close (Fozzy or BeachBum might want to confirm this as long time users). This is the MA I am using and a number of others are using. Earlier on some people had talked of using the SMA, and maybe there are people using that....what works for some doesn't for others. There's also going to be differences depending on your datefeed.

Best of trading with the Fozzy!
You beat me to it willf....at least our answers were consistent and haven't confused anyone!
thanks, willf,
Just Trade.
Quoting willf
In the earlier posts of this thread Fozzy says he uses EMA applied to the RSI (First Indicators Data).
the RSI does not have that option...did you mean the MA was optioned for Exponential? I assume so. Thanks
carpe dium
Suggest anyone with this question reads accrete's post #9.

But it really doesn't matter... sometimes the signal will be the same, sometimes a day earlier or later, sometimes one will keep you out of a whipsaw and vice versa.

What does matter is being clear on your rule set and sticking to it.



J.
IMO............THIS is the most important rule of Fozzy trading!


Quoting jtrade
What does matter is being clear on your rule set and sticking to it.



J.
Hey fellow fozzy traders. I've been trading a slight alteration of willf's fozzy system and I've been getting nice results so i thought I should share.

Very simple.

If the trade follows willf's then just follow willf's directions.

However, if the RSI crosses the MA and is NOT on the correct side of the 50 level, I will enter 1 lot with TP at the next fib line that is at least 20 pips away. However, if within two days, per willf's method the RSI crosses the 50 level, then I add 2 more lots with his same exit strategy.

For SL I either use the ATR or yesterday's low. This is discretionary based on market conditions. With one exception: if my first (non-willf) lot has a TP that is less than either the ATR or the daily low, I set the SL so I get a R:R of 1:1

I love the winning percentage of willf's 50 level filter and that is why I use 2 lots on that. However, I felt that even when the RSI isnt on the right side of the 50, the winning percentage is still large enough to justify an earlier entry of one lot.

Actually, to be honest, i made this alteration because I hit myself in the head many times when waiting for the RSI to cross the 50 and watching large amounts of potential profits go to waste. It's probably not a great reason, but adding the early entry rule relieved some of my stress, which is a huge help even if it isn't more profitable (though as of now, it is)

I don't have any backtest results on this and I do not plan to do extensive backtesting anytime in the near future, so please don't ask for any. All I know is that this method has been successful for me.
Fellow traders, I was looking for the indicator that puts the arrow on the candle we should buy/sell, I only found the indicator that shows the line going to 0 or 100 to signify the buy/sell. Can someomen point me to were I can get this indicator? Thanks.
0 traders viewing now