• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • User/Email: Password:
  • 2:58am
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 2:58am
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

$1000 to $1,000,000,000 in 4 years 125 replies

100$ -->100,000$ (period: 12 months) 207 replies

Gutenberg money printing machine.. 100 to 1.000 to 10.000 to 100.000? 15 replies

From 10,000 to 4,000,000 during the eight years - EA backtest 18 replies

Correlation EUR/USD, USD/CHF, EUR/CHF (Humour me please... Thx) 8 replies

  • Trading Systems
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
Tags: 27/23 System for USD/CHF --$10,000 to $1,100,000 in 2 years?
Cancel

27/23 System for USD/CHF --$10,000 to $1,100,000 in 2 years?

  • Last Post
  •  
  • Page 1 2 3
  • Page 1 2 3
  •  
  • Post #1
  • Quote
  • First Post: Jun 6, 2004 11:17pm Jun 6, 2004 11:17pm
  •  vdeluca
  • | Joined Apr 2004 | Status: Member | 62 Posts
I read the entire thread in Moneytec about this system. It is based on a profit target of only 50 pips per week, and continuously increasing your trade amount as your account grows in value. It is used on the USD/CHF because of its high volatility. With Swissy, you should be able to get 50 pips profit per week pretty easily. According to the poster on moneytec, since January 2003 he has had 44 weeks of 50 pip profit, 3 weeks of losses, and a couple of weeks of 10-20 pip profits.

This is the essence of the system: At the completion of the 7am-8am ET candlestick, you place a buy stop entry at 27 pips above the close of this candlestick, and a sell stop enty at 23 pips below the close. Set 50 pip stop losses.

Your profit target is only 50 pips each week. If close to 12 noon you are up only 20 pips for instance, you take the 20 and come back tomorrow to try to get the other 30. At 12 noon, you close out your position. Once you realize 50 pips profit, you are done for the week-- no more trading. The principle here is that excessive trading is generally not good for your account.

If you start with a $10,000 account, you trade 1 lot until you have $11,000. then you trade 1.1 lots ($11 per pip); $12000, 1.2 lots ($12 per pip) etc. After 1 year you will grow your account to $70,000, and after 2 years your account will be $1,100,000. I have not tried it yet, but if you look at the historical USD/CHF charts you will see that big daily moves are fairly common, especially on the short side. The objective of this system is not to hit grand slams but instead to realize slow but steady growth of your account.
  • Post #2
  • Quote
  • Jun 6, 2004 11:48pm Jun 6, 2004 11:48pm
  •  scpeter
  • | Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Member | 81 Posts
Quoting vdeluca
Disliked
I read the entire thread in Moneytec about this system. It is based on a profit target of only 50 pips per week, and continuously increasing your trade amount as your account grows in value. It is used on the USD/CHF because of its high volatility. With Swissy, you should be able to get 50 pips profit per week pretty easily. According to the poster on moneytec, since January 2003 he has had 44 weeks of 50 pip profit, 3 weeks of losses, and a couple of weeks of 10-20 pip profits.

This is the essence of the system: At the completion of the 7am-8am ET candlestick, you place a buy stop entry at 27 pips above the close of this candlestick, and a sell stop enty at 23 pips below the close. Set 50 pip stop losses.

Your profit target is only 50 pips each week. If close to 12 noon you are up only 20 pips for instance, you take the 20 and come back tomorrow to try to get the other 30. At 12 noon, you close out your position. Once you realize 50 pips profit, you are done for the week-- no more trading. The principle here is that excessive trading is generally not good for your account.

If you start with a $10,000 account, you trade 1 lot until you have $11,000. then you trade 1.1 lots ($11 per pip); $12000, 1.2 lots ($12 per pip) etc. After 1 year you will grow your account to $70,000, and after 2 years your account will be $1,100,000. I have not tried it yet, but if you look at the historical USD/CHF charts you will see that big daily moves are fairly common, especially on the short side. The objective of this system is not to hit grand slams but instead to realize slow but steady growth of your account.
Ignored
Thanks for sharing this information. Maybe merlin could backtest for us.
Steven
Steven
 
 
  • Post #3
  • Quote
  • Jun 7, 2004 12:10am Jun 7, 2004 12:10am
  •  digetman
  • | Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Member | 19 Posts
Quoting vdeluca
Disliked
you trade 1 lot until you have $11,000. then you trade 1.1 lots ($11 per pip); $12000, 1.2 lots ($12 per pip)
Ignored
How do you trade 1.1 lots? I don't think FXCM will allow you to trade partial lots.
 
 
  • Post #4
  • Quote
  • Jun 7, 2004 12:18am Jun 7, 2004 12:18am
  •  doragio
  • | Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Member | 18 Posts
Quoting digetman
Disliked
How do you trade 1.1 lots? I don't think FXCM will allow you to trade partial lots.
Ignored
I think they're referring to a full lot of 100K, in which case you can do a mini account and scale it in 10k increments.
 
 
  • Post #5
  • Quote
  • Jun 7, 2004 12:31am Jun 7, 2004 12:31am
  •  digetman
  • | Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Member | 19 Posts
Quoting doragio
Disliked
I think they're referring to a full lot of 100K, in which case you can do a mini account and scale it in 10k increments.
Ignored
So then what happens when you hit 2.5 lots? I guess you will have to have one regular account and one mini account?
 
 
  • Post #6
  • Quote
  • Jun 7, 2004 12:38am Jun 7, 2004 12:38am
  •  slick 60
  • | Joined May 2004 | Status: TIME is most important ingredient | 91 Posts
VD
Thanks for digging this out of the archives. I have been going through their forum a lot but have not run across this one yet.
Should give er a go mate.
slick 60
 
 
  • Post #7
  • Quote
  • Jun 7, 2004 2:18am Jun 7, 2004 2:18am
  •  doragio
  • | Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Member | 18 Posts
Quoting digetman
Disliked
So then what happens when you hit 2.5 lots? I guess you will have to have one regular account and one mini account?
Ignored
There's no restrictions as far as I can tell on the mini account in my experiences. I've traded 1M (100 10k lots) in a single trade without any problems. Regular 100k accounts have lower pips, while mini accounts have 5 pip spread but you get greater flexibility to adjust your positions up via 10k increments.
 
 
  • Post #8
  • Quote
  • Jun 7, 2004 2:25am Jun 7, 2004 2:25am
  •  linuxtroll
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Mar 2004 | 1,255 Posts
Quoting digetman
Disliked
How do you trade 1.1 lots? I don't think FXCM will allow you to trade partial lots.
Ignored
At Oanda you can trade even 1 unit... 100000 units = 1 lot...

Cheers,
 
 
  • Post #9
  • Quote
  • Edited 10:52am Jun 7, 2004 10:43am | Edited 10:52am
  •  vdeluca
  • | Joined Apr 2004 | Status: Member | 62 Posts
Quoting digetman
Disliked
How do you trade 1.1 lots? I don't think FXCM will allow you to trade partial lots.
Ignored
There are many brokers who do not have any such restrictions. At both CMC and CMS-Forex, for example, you can trade any amount you want: 1 lot, 0.1 lot, 1.25346 lots, etc.
 
 
  • Post #10
  • Quote
  • Jun 7, 2004 11:31am Jun 7, 2004 11:31am
  •  SteamTrader
  • | Joined Apr 2004 | Status: Member | 24 Posts
Quoting vdeluca
Disliked
At the completion of the 7am-8am ET candlestick, you place a buy stop entry at 27 pips above the close of this candlestick, and a sell stop enty at 23 pips below the close.
Ignored
I thought it was at the close of the 8am-9am hourly EST candlestick....(when at 9:00am you get the close price from THAT).
 
 
  • Post #11
  • Quote
  • Jun 7, 2004 3:43pm Jun 7, 2004 3:43pm
  •  vdeluca
  • | Joined Apr 2004 | Status: Member | 62 Posts
The system uses the close of the candlestick at 8 am ET. Historically, the 7am-8am candlestick has very small movement-- 8am-9am is more volatile and thus you would want to have your entry order in place prior to the start of this time frame.
 
 
  • Post #12
  • Quote
  • Jun 8, 2004 12:58am Jun 8, 2004 12:58am
  •  digetman
  • | Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Member | 19 Posts
Do you set a 50 pip limit for each trade or just close at noon?
 
 
  • Post #13
  • Quote
  • Jun 8, 2004 4:32am Jun 8, 2004 4:32am
  •  merlin
  • Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Magic Man | 3,220 Posts
i will check this system out for sure. may take me a week or two, however, because i have a lot of hot ideas ahead of this one. but this one sounds interesting!

this would be hard for me to trade though, my broker doesnt offer the micromini lots. i bet we could manipluate it a bit though to work. lets see if the orignial system works first, and if so i think i can come up with the alternate version.
Relax and be happy.
 
 
  • Post #14
  • Quote
  • Jun 8, 2004 9:57am Jun 8, 2004 9:57am
  •  doclouis
  • | Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Member | 17 Posts
Merlin,
I m very interested in to see if this one holds water.
be well,

Louis
 
 
  • Post #15
  • Quote
  • Edited 12:23pm Jun 8, 2004 10:52am | Edited 12:23pm
  •  PaulYShimada
  • | Joined May 2004 | Status: Member | 12 Posts

The basic problem with the system as described by VDeluca is the proposal's poor Money Management. The system assumes beginning with $10,000 equity and then each entry enters with one full lot, nominally, $1,000. That represents 10% of equity for each entry. Please pay more attention to trading systems research; do not focus too much on entry and exit subsystems (8 or 9am candle).

No sane professional trader (or experienced amateur) would risk 10% equity per trade!! The generally accepted level of risk is 1 to 2% per entry, and no more than 5% in the market at one time.

The best reference that I have found that discusses a COMPLETE TRADING SYSTEM includes the following major subsystems: what to trade, how much to risk (position sizing), when to buy or sell (signals), stops, and planned exits (I have ignored tactics). The reference for an excellent complete system designed by Richard Dennis, the legendary commodities trader (including foreign exchange), who eventually turned US$400 into US$200 million, and gained additional fame for his Turtle experiment in the 1980’s. You can download his COMPLETE system at www.OriginalTurtles.com. I use the Turtle Trading system for position sizing (including scaling up) and stops. Those were his system's most advanced concepts, both being based on volatility.

I use mathematical indicators for entry and exit (trend and cyclic) that I programmed from concepts I researched on the WWW. I started trading common stocks in 1959 and used technical analysis on an HP-35 calculator in 1978. I have been immersed in researching forex trading since this Jan, 20/7. During that time, I have been doing quite a lot of research regarding the aspect of money management, a.k.a. risk management. It is generally agreed that if your tech. analysis system is at least half-way sensible (via back testing), that your success or utter ruin will be determined by your risk management system and adherence to it.

To recap, trade 1-2% of equity per trade and risk no more than 5% concurrently in the market. (See the Turtle Trading System regarding the relationship between the level of correlation among concurrent trades and position sizing.) In our business, we have witnessed dozens of $10,000 forex accounts that were rendered crippled or destroyed within 2 to 4 weeks when 10% of equity ($1000, full lot) was used per entry. Please note, that a mini account with only $1000 starting equity is just as risky if $100 is bet per trade. So the minimum forex account is more than $5000 if traded with mini lots. [Even $5000 is too small if you have an early run of bad luck.]

Why is 10% too much to risk? If 10% is risked for each trade, you can afford to lose no more then 9 trades because the 10th trade would likely encounter call margin. Anyway, most traders would not keep betting until they lost 90% of their equity. They usually quit after losing 40% to 60%. So, what are the odds of at least 6 losses out of 9 trades? ONLY about 16% or about 1 out of 6! Are you willing to lose 60% of your equity with those odds? Try running a simple BASIC program to simulate 9 trades, each with 50% win/loss probability. Alternatively, try flipping a coin 9 times. If you are not wiped out in 9 tries, keep track of your wins and losses—if you don’t wipe out in 9 trades, the end is nevertheless very near! The odds of 16% is too high to risk my $10,000! [More rigorously, a loss does not necessarily result in full loss of the entry bet, but the general concept still stands, 10% is too much!]

It seems that many participants in the discussion were enamored with the apparent simplicity of the system and the very attractive hoped for result; that was merely the first of the twins of doom--greed and fear.

May the Trend be with you,
Paul Y. Shimada

 
1
  • Post #16
  • Quote
  • Jun 8, 2004 12:06pm Jun 8, 2004 12:06pm
  •  merlin
  • Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Magic Man | 3,220 Posts
Quoting PaulYShimada
Disliked
The basic problem with the system as described by VDeluca is the aspect of Money Management. The proposal assumes beginning with $10,000 equity and then each entry enters with one full lot, nominally, $1,000. That represents 10% for each entry. Please pay more attention to trading systems research; do not focus too much on entry and exit subsystems.

No sane professional trader (or experienced amateur) would risk 10% equity per trade!! The generally accepted level of risk is 1 to 2% per entry, and no more than 5% in the market at one time.

The best reference that I have found that discusses a COMPLETE TRADING SYSTEM includes the following major subsystems: what to trade, how much to risk (position sizing), when to buy or sell (signals), stops, and planned exits (I have ignored tactics). The reference is an excellent system that was designed by Richard Dennis, the legendary trader who turned a legendary commodities trader, including foreign exchange, who eventually turned US$400 into US$200 million, and gained additional fame for his Turtle experiment in the 1980’s. You can download his COMPLETE system at www.OriginalTurtles.com. I use the Turtle Trading system for position sizing (including scaling up) and stops. Those were his system's most sophisticated concepts.

I use mathematical indicators for entry and exit (trend and cyclic) that I programmed from concepts I researched on the WWW. I have done quite a lot of research regarding the aspect of money management, a.k.a. risk management. It is generally agreed that if your tech. analysis system is at least half-way sensible (via back testing), that your success or utter ruin will be determined by your risk management system and adherence to it.

To recap, trade 1-2% of equity per trade and risk no more than 5% concurrently in the market. (See the Turtle Trading System regarding the relationship between the level of correlation among concurrent trades and position sizing.) In our business, we have witnessed dozens of $10,000 accounts that were rendered crippled or destroyed within 2 to 4 weeks when 10% of equity was used per entry. Please note, that a mini account with only $1000 starting equity is just as risky if $100 is risked per trade.

Why is 10% too much? Consider that if 10% is risked for each trade, you can afford to lose only about 9 trades because the 10th trade would likely encounter call margin. Most traders will not lose 90% of their equity; they usually quit after losses of 40% to 60%. What are the odds of 6 losses out of 9? Probability suggests that the odds are ONLY 1 out of 64. Well, are you willing to be wiped out with those odds? Try running a simple BASIC program to simulate 64 trades, each with 50% win/loss probability. Alternatively, try flipping a coin; 1/64 sounds low until you realize what is at risk!

It seems that many participants in the discussion were enamored with the apparent simplicity of the system and the very attractive hoped for result; that was merely the first of the twins of doom--greed and fear.

May the Trend be with you,
Paul Y. Shimada
Ignored
WOW! Well said...very well said.
Relax and be happy.
 
 
  • Post #17
  • Quote
  • Jun 8, 2004 12:06pm Jun 8, 2004 12:06pm
  •  merlin
  • Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Magic Man | 3,220 Posts
btw, that link to originalturtles.com gets redirected to some other site. is this right?
Relax and be happy.
 
 
  • Post #18
  • Quote
  • Jun 8, 2004 12:29pm Jun 8, 2004 12:29pm
  •  PaulYShimada
  • | Joined May 2004 | Status: Member | 12 Posts
Quoting merlin
Disliked
btw, that link to originalturtles.com gets redirected to some other site. is this right?
Ignored
Sorry, it should be: www.OriginalTurtles.org
 
 
  • Post #19
  • Quote
  • Jun 8, 2004 1:05pm Jun 8, 2004 1:05pm
  •  merlin
  • Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Magic Man | 3,220 Posts
Paul, you sound like you got this forex thing down pat. how long have you been trading?
Relax and be happy.
 
 
  • Post #20
  • Quote
  • Jun 8, 2004 1:16pm Jun 8, 2004 1:16pm
  •  digetman
  • | Joined Mar 2004 | Status: Member | 19 Posts
So if you bump it down to 2% per trade you should still get there in 10 years. I can wait 10 years.
 
 
  • Trading Systems
  • /
  • 27/23 System for USD/CHF --$10,000 to $1,100,000 in 2 years?
  • Reply to Thread
    • Page 1 2 3
    • Page 1 2 3
0 traders viewing now
  • More
Top of Page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2023