
$1000 to $1,000,000,000 in 4 years 125 replies
Cross-period custom indicator returning incorrect values during backtest 6 replies
Visual backtest result different from non-visual backtest 0 replies
More bars on chart during backtest? 5 replies
DislikedI achieved same results in 1 year from $600 to $130,000 http://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=544878 And as expected it didn't work out so well in live market. Backtesting doesn't mean much. Only forward testing on live account is proof that strategy works.Ignored
Disliked{quote} im afraid it doesn't. demo offer perfect execution 0 slippage, off quote, spread spike, nothing of that. that's why live account much different.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I have traded demo along side of live through pepperstone and there is no difference between the 2. Its exactly the same. {quote} When testing an ea you need to fund the smallest live account possible to test. No one will buy or use an ea unless its been tested live.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Maybe if you are trading manually or avg trade duration is over 1day. But in reality it is impossible that you get the same execution on live as a ECN model. If you understand that on a ECN you must have a buyer and a seller and a ECN will find the best bid and ask price which for most because their account is so small and irrelevant will most likely get other traders or on the broker books sometimes. But once you start trading real lots and volume you will actually get bank liquidity and subject to slippage and spread variations. The liquidity...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I have traded demo along side of live through pepperstone and there is no difference between the 2. Its exactly the same. {quote} When testing an ea you need to fund the smallest live account possible to test. No one will buy or use an ea unless its been tested live.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thats true but you would have to be trading million dollar accounts before any significant slippage will occur.Ignored