Disliked{quote} Why didn’t you answer the question? Secondly: How much more evidence you need?https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...0#post15088640 Somebody willing to impersonate herself (Patricia) like this doesn’t alarm you? What motive(s) Patricia has with her fake pictures of trading? What does it tell about you if you can’t comprehend the situation? And your lame “jokes” about mom and dad tells me that your iq is lower than 40… Maybe grow up and use more modern “jokes”? Oh and pay your mom for basement space she would be proud...Ignored
1. A dollar made or loss is in his/her account, either demo, real, photoshop, or photocopy. It has nothing to do with me.
2. If someone who truly wants to make it, he should know that there is a price to pay. You cannt just sit by, being a lazycunt and expect you would make it in life. Anyone in any industry, who make it, were the one who were prepared to bleed for it.
3. Is related to 2, only the lazycunt who would give someone else to trade for him/her. The real wealth is not made by passively taking risk, but by being actively taking calculated risks. If someone isnt ready to actively taking risk, then stable life it is; that is 9-5, eating your head of department's shit each and everyday of your life. ( fact #3, is same as letting someone else screw your wife on the first wedding night)
4. Patrica, Newton, Abraham Lincoln or Danzel washington, it doesnot matter for me, because, they only provide insight for a trade setup. But the inherent risk, the risk parameters or where the probability are skewed for a trade setup, still remained the main ingredient for the trader success.
5. In wall street, the true success parameters are not defined by Iq, but how big your balls can go. The same goes with trading as whole industry.
If by now, you still thought that the smartest means the richest then, you are a cunt.
More time in the market, does not mean you trade better!
4