Disliked{quote} It's a logical aspect twisted fact that causes misunderstand and unfair accusement. 1. what you're talking about is " frauds = nice person ; Navk = nice person ; but Navk ≠ fraud ?" If "a nice person" is the essential condition of fraud, you need to add another filter question to confirm " if this nice person = fraud " . --> you need to have some " legal proofs "
. 2. " there are many red flags about him " As to MFF event, my view is that Navk is a victim / customer and still giving...
Ignored
1. Never said that. Pls read again.
2. Yes, there are so many red flags. Read his posts immediately after the mff incident occured. Clearly damage control at its finest...
3. You are spinnning the facts. I am not judge, police etc. just pointing out some obvious things SO MAYBE IN THE FUTURE SOME TRADERS WILL NOT GET CAUGHT IN THESE SCHEMES BY PRETENDED PROFITABLE TRADERS WITH 100S FUNDED ACCOUNTS, WHICH IN FACT ARE TAKING SOME FEES FROM THE GULLIBLES. If you dont get it, you dont get it...
Cheers
PS and, in advance, please spare me with comments regarding the use of capitals...
On ignore list of scammers, deceivers and low IQ individuals. Exclusively