Cable Update (GBPUSD)

You would be correct if u didn't put a tight SL at 1.1030 for EURUSD Imagine losing 200 pips for 15 pips. Stingy

If you are the man, let's do a trading challenge. Are you brave enough?

Oh man, 1 Peter is enough.
No more please

show some skills or go home, simple, or go jerk off your frend fxjustzero so that can help with your foustration after loosing your all money

Risk 20 pips. Long 1.2700 SL 1.2680

life is challenged him enough

Price never returned to 1.1030 after I shorted EUR.USD and that's not even the first time I shorted it. My first day shorting it was 2023.07.18.

Not really even sure what your post means. It makes no sense.

are we gona go thru this everytime?...i gave the symbol in my post


bonds look like they just bottomed on a weekly double bottom symbol ZB

Maybe Futures broker.

Exactly, he saw no love and no attention during his life, he is trying to feel better here

You forgot to read the latter part. If you dare to quote my post, you better accept the trading challenge. If you are not brave enough, don't waste my time.

see how easy it is to make google your friend

or download tradingview if your shitbag broker platform dont have it

that ZERO only challanging people in backtesting stocks strategy, dont waste your time on this moron, he already swimming with fecals

I started Selling Pound, Euro and Franc against Yen. Tommorow Daily Chart is confirming Short and tommorow I'll add again.

Tommorow, they'll drop like flies.

Still holding Gold Long below 1900$.

F. rock, scissors, paper

You are right

Georginson, please can you share what is the average range for September on GBP/USD?

Thanks!

Yea no point to waste precious time and energy on him or Ferna. They are very empty-headed people. In time they will go so broke and leave. How much you can take on that burger flipping salary and constantly losing accounts...

We need someone like Ata in this forum to keep ignoring useless comments.

I will try to be soft about this for you, as you took some time to type that.

You've twisted the context to suit your idea of what it's about to you. That's not observational it's opinion.

An easy way to show you -

Q - Then = "You did a good job johnny, you've earned a gold star."
- Now = "Great post/point/pic/screenshot (etc) johnny here's a thumbs up for your efforts".

What you are doing is removing the responsibility OF the adult and the adult's environment (that is a direct AND indirect result OF the responsibility NOT only the presence of the adult) and suggesting that children do not think they imitate and shadow. This in a small way is true, however, IF you watch a child carefully and for long enough, they learn right from wrong ALSO by their own observations and NOT only by doing as they see "big people" around them doing. You have forgotten the main key to it, LEARNING .... not mimicry. You are trying to label behavior as learning and it is not, it's merely a small part of mental stretching.

"Do as I say not as I do" = Behavioral mimicry. "Do as I do" = Same.

"I will do as you all do but why (.......)?" = Learning. Changing the parameters to gain insight.

Now the context - If a structure is provided and it has functions then those functions are present but at no time or point in any reference, is it mandatory to use it at all, or as described or presented. If observations are made that offer insight into a situation that may cause damage, a person has two choices. Use it or not.

Eg. - Other than in jest and tomfoolery, here on these sites, I, PeterCaleb, have never given "thumbs up". It is lazy and creates a lazy mind. The activity of giving thumbs up is not used by people to fully communicate. Same re: giving a gold star to a child. It imposes conditioning. And restates that conditioning if it was previously present.

Surface (lazy = little energy) communication and behavior is taught from person to people from those who don't know any better. Structure to person is different. The fact that people here are accepting of its use provides no credit to its use or the healthiness OF its use.

As to masking = once you introduce context, masking is of little use. It is why it's so silly that people say the same things over and over again on these sites. They're not learning anything.

What you are doing (based on your writings here anyway) is creating a closed loop of "life" and Life doesn't work that way. Not even in the generalized or overall group. People who are not attached/anchored to anything real have no view of what they're doing. Therefore, on auto pilot. Doing without any conscious present thinking involved.

To use the functions on these sites is either - a conscious choice or an automatic activity. But choice is compressed as it's really about consequences within the choice. Beyond cause and effect and context.

So as I said earlier, just because the structure puts the function there, has nothing to do with me using it or WHY I would use it. Just that I recognize the consequences OF using it. And then choose. It's known as foresight. Foresight plus context. Something that most people are sorely lacking in these days.

Maybe that helps.


Peter

go ask friendly google.... this is trading hours and im underwater on gold and im trying to manage a drawdown and dont need your questions that can be answered on google

im beginning to think youre doing this shit just to annoy me cause i cant believe a grown man cant search and learn for himself.... unless youre just plain lazy and want others to waste their time teaching you

good luck