Disliked{quote} Well for me it is the truth, and yes we can prove it as truth.Ignored
So - what you are saying is: if somebody else proves it for you, then "we" (?) can prove it. But wouldn't that only be 1 or 2 or 50 people and doesn't the truth imply that we are talking about 100% per cent of cases?
I think you are a great friend of generalisations - and as you know - they always tend to be false (because you only have to find one exception to falsify it; see: Karl Popper)
2. "useless books"
Why were the books "useless"?
a) the person couldn't read
b) the person couldn't understand the book
c) the writer didn't make sense etc.
3. "All the stuff they're selling you is 100% recycled garbage."
a) who are "they"?
b) how do you know it is "all the stuff" if you never bought any (maybe it is just 50 % of the stuff, or 10, or 84 etc)
c) why does it have to be recycled? Is this at all relevant to the truth-claim?
4. "Maybe it does work for some people, who knows?"
If this sentence is true, then the rest of your argument isn't (because in that case it is not 100% garbage etc)
5. "All I know is I would have never developed my system the way I did"
True, of course, because this is always true for every activity - that's why this sentence is called a platitude...
6. "...had I cluttered my mind with the garbage they sell and claim to be life changing."
a) how do you know you'd have "cluttered" your mind? Maybe you'd have been enlightened or whatever
b) how do you know it is garbage (if you never even tried it)?
c) repeating the same claim ("garbage") doesn't make it more truthful.
7. "I've uploaded some screenshots here of one of my other accounts to further show proof."
"Proof" of what? How does any screenshot you post of your personal system prove that somebody else's stuff is "garbage" etc?
8. "You're more than welcome to share some of your stats as well so we can compare since It sounds like if you've purchased a fair amount of the recycled garbage that's been floating around"
Does anything I have posted suggest to you that I would have purchased - what you call - "garbage" (even "a fair amount" of it)?
Why? Because you want to believe that without the slightest evidence? This is called an "ad hominem argument" (if you can't win a fair argument - for whatever reason - you can always denigrate the other person)
I think you proved the point I was trying to make in my last post. Thank you - and have a nice weekend. All the best.
2
18/22 Most bullish month in terms of seasonal stats
Median body - 222 Median range - 548 (pic. body by month) {image}
