Analysis and Trading based on Envelopes, Waves, Cycles

Quoting MoeinYzz

Disliked

You're gonna need these kinds of imaginations to envision waves in play : )) {image}{image}(Don't mind the lot size. Just having fun while practicing) ; )

Ignored

Quoting medici

Disliked

{quote} What a rocker! I had taken profit, and a break ahead of the afternoon action...but at least it was a setup in my model, and target reached to the point But I had saved that ride for later today....ah, well, the markets will move on Monday too. {image}

Ignored

Quoting parisboy

Disliked

{quote} Medici you just have seen a Doubling effect. By doubling the parameters of the Envelope(s) you keep "most of" Price Action within your Envelope system. It is what OAPDave labels as a "Chart Shift" (OAPDave Trademark) To take into account such a surge, impulse it can be useful to keep 2 different charts with 2 sets of parameters because during some time you have a Phase of Transition before the new set of parameters fully apply to the chart.

Ignored

Quoting medici

Disliked

{quote} Merci Alain, I believe I understand what you mean as far as my own trading goes, but are you referring to the beginning or the end of the impulse, or both?

Ignored

Quoting parisboy

Disliked

{quote} Medici I do not understand your question. What I mean is that ; a) before the "surge" + 520 points in 5 minutes / 5 bars Envelopes parameters were 125/62.5/31.25 b) after the "surge" to adapt the Envelopes to the Price Action the new Envelopes parameters are 250/125/62.5 The key is in the correct scaling {image}

Ignored

Quoting helioss

Disliked

BTCUSD Weekly 16-32-64....... this is price/time projection based on 16/32 cross Seems that TP was done {image}

Ignored

Quoting parisboy

Disliked

QUIZZ : This BTCUSD Weekly Chart uses the 13/26/52/104/208 parameters for the Centered Moving Averages ? the previous one used16/32/64/128/256 which Chart is the "best" adapted and why ? {image} {image}

Ignored

Quoting js497

Disliked

{quote} 13weeks => 0.25 year <= 64 days 26 => 0.5 year <= 128 days 52 weeks => 1year <= 256 days 104 > 2years <= 512 days 208 => 4 years <= 1024 days It corresponds at cycles calendar, i will say it's more sensitive on chart edit : excepted for 104 and 208, i would to say 78(1.5year) or 156weeks(3years) and 156(3years) or 234weeks(4.5years) which corresponds at nominal model of jim hurst

Ignored

Quoting js497

Disliked

{quote} 13weeks => 0.25 year <= 64 days 26 => 0.5 year <= 128 days 52 weeks => 1year <= 256 days 104 > 2years <= 512 days 208 => 4 years <= 1024 days It corresponds at cycles calendar, i will say it's more sensitive on chart edit : excepted for 104 and 208, i would to say 78(1.5year) or 156weeks(3years) and 156(3years) or 234weeks(4.5years) which corresponds at nominal model of jim hurst

Ignored