EURUSD | Page 60244 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CHF

Similar Threads

MT4: how to change "EURUSD" to "#EURUSD"? 3 replies

Re: EurUsd short term 15 replies

did oanda just drop its spread for eurusd to 1 pip? 11 replies

EA for multiple lot limit order for EURUSD 0 replies

NFP nice bump up on EURUSD 2 replies

Attachments: EURUSD
Exit Attachments

EURUSD

  • #1,204,861
  • Nov 29, 2021 5:42pm Nov 29, 2021 5:42pm
Quoting moondoggie
{quote} Every news site is in some way biased, I agree. Some less so, others more so. However, a responsible news reader will pull multiple sources and form a well-researched opinion.
so you agree that one should take as many sites as possible? NOT ignore them.
In tea leaves we trust!
  • #1,204,862
  • Nov 29, 2021 5:44pm Nov 29, 2021 5:44pm
Good info on the omicron variant.

https://qz.com/2095354/what-are-the-...icron-variant/
  • #1,204,863
  • Nov 29, 2021 5:46pm Nov 29, 2021 5:46pm
Quoting Winston Reed
{quote} It's revealing that you view educated individuals with opinions differing than yours as having annoyingly big egos. I don't mind arguing all day about something of importance such as Covid especially when there is an abundance of disinformation on both sides. Anyone with just a little bit of investigational prowess will discover the evidence of therapeutics for the early treatment of covid infection which would nullify the emergency authorization of the vaccine in the US. There is a plethora of very well-done studies supporting the use of...

Mate, you just demanded me to apologize to an entire profession when all I did was call you out on your ego.You're a nurse with advanced education, sure have a cookie, I don't really care. The demand itself is proof of your ego and even your own self righteousness. And I readily and easily gave my apology because my intentions are clear: i'm insulting you and not the entire nursing profession. My readiness to oblige your request speaks volumes about my lack of ego or self righteousness, in fact.

So look, I mention nothing about the actual politics of COVID in my replies to you, and yet here you are babbling about it again to me. DeSantis this, Schelp that. You're the one looking for a debate, man.
Trying my best.
  • #1,204,864
  • Nov 29, 2021 5:47pm Nov 29, 2021 5:47pm
Quoting Nordling00
{quote} Believe me no one in Turkey wants a war.
Analysts say the opposite, have you seen the map that Erdogan showed? In all these countries, they talk about unification into a single Turan. The military is trained in Turkish academies. Everyone is inclined to the same opinion, the Turks are preparing for war.
  • #1,204,865
  • Nov 29, 2021 5:51pm Nov 29, 2021 5:51pm
He is never been to Turkey, talk about Australia
POSTMASTER
  • #1,204,866
  • Nov 29, 2021 5:52pm Nov 29, 2021 5:52pm
Quoting Mcbeaners
{quote} so you agree that one should take as many sites as possible? NOT ignore them.

I think that if a person has the time and the desire to find out the truth(?), then sure, take in many sources. But sources should be vetted, and many news sites are funded by groups that understand the power of digital marketing in the political space.
Trying my best.
  • #1,204,867
  • Nov 29, 2021 6:10pm Nov 29, 2021 6:10pm
Quoting Robinhood1
He is never been to Turkey, talk about Australia
Australia fraudulently took the ocean floor from Tibor, where large hydrocarbon reserves lie. Tibor lost 400 thousand inhabitants of his island for independence. Australia is an indirect participant in this action.
  • #1,204,868
  • Nov 29, 2021 6:11pm Nov 29, 2021 6:11pm
Quoting moondoggie
{quote} Mate, you just demanded me to apologize to an entire profession when all I did was call you out on your ego.You're a nurse with advanced education, sure have a cookie, I don't really care. The demand itself is proof of your ego and even your own self righteousness. And I readily and easily gave my apology because my intentions are clear: i'm insulting you and not the entire nursing profession. My readiness to oblige your request speaks volumes about my lack of ego or self righteousness, in fact. So look, I mention nothing about the actual...
I'm glad you admitted the truth. You only intend to insult.

I didn't demand an apology for myself (go back and read that post).

The self righteousness I speak of is that which comes from an individual who has been a member of FF since Oct 2021 with less than 100 posts and is demanding adherence to a "trading only discussion" in a thread with a rich history of discussion often minimally related to trading.

Your apology is accepted and I do see how you likely did not intend to smear nursing in general.

If you want to belittle me then go ahead. My intentions are noble and do not stem from self recognition. It is a sincere attempt to reveal the other side of the Covid debate. Making that statement is not an invitation to debate you on it as you insist.

You're right, I'm looking for a debate, just not from you. For the most part I've engaged you to point out your predilection to ridicule and profane others. It's why you made the unintentional statement about nursing. It's just your nature.

I like chocolate chip cookies too. With coffee, black.
  • #1,204,869
  • Nov 29, 2021 6:18pm Nov 29, 2021 6:18pm
Alex Berenson. One of the first ones to point out the ridiculousness of masking and shutdowns amongst other draconian measures unnecessarily perpetrated on Americans all in the name of "keeping us safe" at the expense of our freedoms

https://townhall.com/columnists/alex...lives-n2599327
  • #1,204,870
  • Nov 29, 2021 6:42pm Nov 29, 2021 6:42pm
Quoting Winston Reed
{quote} I'm glad you admitted the truth. You only intend to insult. I didn't demand an apology for myself (go back and read that post). The self righteousness I speak of is that which comes from an individual who has been a member of FF since Oct 2021 with less than 100 posts and is demanding adherence to a "trading only discussion" in a thread with a rich history of discussion often minimally related to trading. Your apology is accepted and I do see how you likely did not intend to smear nursing in general. If you want to belittle me then go ahead....

You're the one that demanded that I apologize to your profession, the ANA didn't quote my post.

You claim to post far-right news sites with questionable information for the purpose of debate, when you offer no explanation for your intentions. This is not the move of a person with a higher education who wants to encourage healthy discussion about a political issue. And when someone asks you to stop posting inflammatory political things that detract from the thread's purposes, you call that person self-righteous.

Yes, we've already gone over me being self-righteous. I'm okay with that and I'm 100% aware of my green status in FF. This has no bearing on what i'm insulting you for or what I've been asking you to do.

I mention one small thing about your cute widdo nursing job and your tone escalates to a highly defensive one. Honestly dude, you sound like such a nurse. Intellectually insecure and stressed. I used to be around hospitals a lot, and well, I've had great nurses and really terrible ones who never accepted the responsibility of their vocation but still thought they deserved to be paid as much as a doctor. But thank you for your service during this pandemic, I mean that. I hope you're one of the good ones. I won't engage with you anymore on this topic. Thanks for the typing exercise, mate
Trying my best.
  • #1,204,871
  • Nov 29, 2021 7:16pm Nov 29, 2021 7:16pm
Quoting moondoggie
{quote} You're the one that demanded that I apologize to your profession, the ANA didn't quote my post. You claim to post far-right news sites with questionable information for the purpose of debate, when you offer no explanation for your intentions. This is not the move of a person with a higher education who wants to encourage healthy discussion about a political issue. And when someone asks you to stop posting inflammatory political things that detract from the thread's purposes, you call that person self-righteous. Yes, we've already gone over...
What is "far right"? What is "questionable" about them? Inflammatory? Why? Because you disagree which is ok but being unable to articulate your position you ridicule and profane. Anyone is free to post their own sources and freely engage in discourse. What's wrong with that? I clearly stated my intention but let me clearly do so here so you don't have to make up my intentions for me:

I intend to illuminate an increasingly less-suppressed truth about Covid, the mandates, lockdowns and other related issues.

Many, not all of my posts, have links to studies or news article supporting my assertions. Others are free to disagree and post material supporting their views. I will never smear, besmirch, profane, nor make fun of anyone posting their views. I will engage in discussion and passionately express my agreement or disagreement. If you think I do this to inflate my ego then so be it.

Finally let me highlight what you said in your reply to me:

Honestly dude, you sound like such a nurse. Intellectually insecure and stressed.

I've had great nurses and really terrible ones who never accepted the responsibility of their vocation but still thought they deserved to be paid as much as a doctor.

Intellectually insecure individuals are unlikely to withstand the rigors of nursing school. You bet nurses get stressed and with good reason. They work in some of the most horrendous situations and conditions imaginable. I won't waste my time giving you examples that you likely will ridicule. As with any profession there will be exceptions. Yet you have again targeted nurses so profoundly stated and now highlighted for everyones review.

Your apology is rejected because you in fact are not sincere. You are a bigot to the core. Your thanks for my service is rejected because again you do not mean it.

I'm glad you are choosing to exit the conversation because you really should. I hope you do some serious soul searching.
  • #1,204,872
  • Nov 29, 2021 7:29pm Nov 29, 2021 7:29pm
Wall to wall moron variant media junkies shooting up untested gene therapies!
Founder of Sutherland Wave Principle
  • #1,204,873
  • Nov 29, 2021 8:12pm Nov 29, 2021 8:12pm
Quoting Winston Reed
{quote} Covid 19 was a very serious disease. It however has been handled very poorly by the Biden Administration. Early in the pandemic hydroxychloroquine was shown to be an effective early treatment. Only because Trump endorsed it did the woke mob demonize probably the safest drug in the world. But not only was hydroxychloroquine demonized but any other therapeutic. Despite Biden and Kamala initially ridiculing Trumps successful Warp Speed campaign that created the Covid vaccine they then made a 180. Initially they were against the vaccine then...
As a registered nurse manager at a facility here in the United States, I have the experience to share. We recently had a teammate of ours test positive for covid 19 with symptoms including loss of taste and smell. We had to do a facility-wide COVID-19 protocol to rule out any more cases. What needs to be shared is that my facility has a greater than 90% vaccination rate. We did not threaten to fire anyone, but we did "encourage" them. As a nurse yourself, you know there are many ways to encourage compliance, and I regret my participation in that decision. And yet, one of our teammates contracted the virus. This, of course, is very concerning to the medical community and is being underreported, I believe. The concern is now there could be people walking around with Covid 19, but because of the vaccine, the symptoms would be suppressed to the point of being asymptomatic. I'm not sure what is going on, but something is definitely going on.

Quoting moondoggie
You claim to post far-right news sites with questionable information for the purpose of debate, when you offer no explanation for your intentions. This is not the move of a person with a higher education who wants to encourage healthy discussion about a political issue.
In science, there is no such thing as far right and far left. There is only sourced and peer reviewed. There is nothing political about virology itself. How people respond to the information is what is political. Insomuch as trading is concerned, a point comes when competency is achieved, and there is not much to do but wait for your set up. That is why people come to the factory, mainly to pass the time.
If you are good at something, never do it for free--Joker
  • #1,204,874
  • Nov 29, 2021 8:33pm Nov 29, 2021 8:33pm
Quoting jmn5611
{quote} As a registered nurse manager at a facility here in the United States, I have the experience to share. We recently had a teammate of ours test positive for covid 19 with symptoms including loss of taste and smell. We had to do a facility-wide COVID-19 protocol to rule out any more cases. What needs to be shared is that my facility has a greater than 90% vaccination rate. We did not threaten to fire anyone, but we did "encourage" them. As a nurse yourself, you know there are many ways to encourage compliance, and I regret my participation...
I agree, mate. Science has no political agenda. But when a nurse practitioner with a tendency to condescend posts an article about COVID that is neither well-sourced nor peer reviewed, then I believe I'm allowed to be concerned. Anyway I've stopped engaging with the nurse, even deleted my most recent post. There's no point in wasting the good nurse's energy.
Trying my best.
  • #1,204,875
  • Nov 29, 2021 8:42pm Nov 29, 2021 8:42pm
Well said.

While it may seem I am "anti-vax" I am not. I am anti-vax-mandate to my very core because such a medically required invasive procedure should never be mandated as a contingency of employment or continued employment. Everyone should be educated regarding the facts and this is not being truthfully done.

Influenza has and will likely remain the recent record holder for deaths. Just do a quick search for deaths over the last 20 years and you'll see what I mean. Most hospitals want their employees vaccinated for the Flu but those who refuse vaccination are not fired. They do have to take precautions during flu season that the vaccinated do not have to (even thought the flu vaccine never covers all flu variants).

The vast majority of individuals who contract Covid will be asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic. The very old and those with serious comorbidities are at more risk for death and hospitalization. This is undisputed fact.

The vaccinated are not immune to covid and also spread the disease. This is also undisputed fact.

There are therapeutics such as hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, azithromycin, dexamethasone, zinc, vitamin D and others that when used as part of a protocol of which several have been thoroughly studied and absolutely proven to be effective in preventing hospitalizations and death especially when begun early in the disease. This is knowledge that has been suppressed or censored but is now getting out there. It is readily available to anyone by doing a simple search.

My unvaccinated grandson contracted covid and was completely asymptomatic. He now has natural immunity. He'll never be vaccinated with a poorly studied vaccine that has a tendency to cause myocarditis in children of his age.

The vaccine is not preventing spread. There are significant numbers of deaths occurring in the vaccinated.

www.openvaers.com is an excellent site to begin one's search for the truth.
  • #1,204,876
  • Nov 29, 2021 8:54pm Nov 29, 2021 8:54pm
Quoting moondoggie
{quote} I agree, mate. Science has no political agenda. But when a nurse practitioner with a tendency to condescend posts an article about COVID that is neither well-sourced nor peer reviewed, then I believe I'm allowed to be concerned. Anyway I've stopped engaging with the nurse, even deleted my most recent post. There's no point in wasting the good nurse's energy.
Get your facts straight friend. I never condescended anyone's. Disagreement is not condescension.

News articles are submitted by journalists and are generally not peer reviewed. By their very nature they also tend not to be well-sourced although many are. This does not mean that the information in them is false. One has the right to agree or disagree with it. To say such articles are flat out unworthy of any consideration is in effect a censorship.

The studies I have posted in some of my posts are absolutely peer reviewed. The methodology employed in a RCT (randomized controlled trial), observational study or otherwise reveals it's validity. So just because it is an RCT doesn't make it a good study. One needs to understand the methodology underlying the results and conclusions.

You've engaged me in a passive aggressive manner. It's cowardly but I will respond accordingly.
  • #1,204,877
  • Nov 29, 2021 9:18pm Nov 29, 2021 9:18pm
Quoting Winston Reed
{quote} Get your facts straight friend. I never condescended anyone's. Disagreement is not condescension. News articles are submitted by journalists and are generally not peer reviewed. By their very nature they also tend not to be well-sourced although many are. This does not mean that the information in them is false. One has the right to agree or disagree with it. To say such articles are flat out unworthy of any consideration is in effect a censorship. The studies I have posted in some of my posts are absolutely peer reviewed. The methodology...
I'm not even replying to you, but okay, old-timer.

"Sarcasm is a useful tool used by intelligent debaters who refuse to lower themselves to the barbarism of profanity, name-calling and bullying. Use of such tactics is for simpletons." Is that not condescension?

Why couldn't you withstand the academic rigors of virology or medicine? Huh? Kindly remind yourself that your opinion as a nurse is less valuable than that of virologists and doctors. I brought up the nurse issue, which you so slovenly like to reference, because nurses with big egos get people killed. Death remains the most common patient injury that results in a lawsuit. It accounts for 44.3% all malpractice claims against nurses. I know nurses like that, nurses like you. Slow to admit your wrongs.

Now listen, and I 100% mean this unironically, you make a ton of sense when you're not defending your bullshit attitude. I learned a lot from your last post about the effectiveness of certain therapies in preventing hospitalization, and I'm now encouraged to read more about it. I also stumbled upon your Basics thread when I first joined FF, and it was incredibly helpful to me during my first few days of trading. You're better off speaking as a knowledgeable trader and/or medical professional, instead of posting those shit articles from conservative news sites.

I too will respond accordingly.
Trying my best.
  • #1,204,878
  • Nov 29, 2021 9:19pm Nov 29, 2021 9:19pm
Quoting moondoggie
{quote} I think that if a person has the time and the desire to find out the truth(?), then sure, take in many sources. But sources should be vetted, and many news sites are funded by groups that understand the power of digital marketing in the political space.
how does one vett such a site? one either has a brian for thinking or following. that is the issue with non-msm outlets, they are not oligarch/government vetted so you can any opinion. there are plently of sites that are not worth reading becuase they make their living selling hyperpole. but those are easy to see and you move on.
In tea leaves we trust!
  • #1,204,879
  • Nov 29, 2021 9:35pm Nov 29, 2021 9:35pm
Quoting Winston Reed
Good info on the omicron variant. https://qz.com/2095354/what-are-the-...icron-variant/
I agree with this article I have also read it before from Reuters
  • #1,204,880
  • Nov 29, 2021 9:38pm Nov 29, 2021 9:38pm
Quoting Mcbeaners
{quote} how does one vett such a site? one either has a brian for thinking or following. that is the issue with non-msm outlets, they are not oligarch/government vetted so you can any opinion. there are plently of sites that are not worth reading becuase they make their living selling hyperpole. but those are easy to see and you move on.

It is indeed tricky when it comes to outlets beyond the mainstream eye, though I don't think its as simple as thinking vs following. News organizations are still companies, owned or controlled by people with vested interests. Either follow the money or dig into the reporter compiling the data/information for public consumption. Last step would be confirming the report via cross-examination with other news outlets and their coverage of the event.

Personally, I really like The Associated Press as my first-read news outlet. Its a long-running, well-pedigreed, independent news organization with 50+ Pulitzer Prizes to its name. It's not a singular entity but a kind of ensemble organization with journalists from different organizations in various parts of the world. Because of this, I feel like they may have less political influencers hovering over their publishing decisions. They claim a factual process, but I still take that with a small lick of salt regardless of their track record. Decent stuff!
Trying my best.
311 traders viewing now