Dislikedthat's not the setting he was asking about, he was asking about your screenshot in post in 19,682, which doesn't have any notes blam {quote}Ignored
2
CCFp weekly signals (set and forget basket trading)
- #19,882
- Oct 28, 2020 2:24pm Oct 28, 2020 2:24pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: trader | 1,703 Posts
And the results for today, 09:00 and 12:00. Same setting.
- #19,883
- Oct 28, 2020 4:06pm Oct 28, 2020 4:06pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: trader | 1,703 Posts
EA v88 has a serious bug do not use it. I'm saying that because v93 was profited with same settings and v88 was loss. Try v93 on demo you will realise. I can recommend v93. Take it seriously!
RS
{quote} In my experience, xm7's ea's are definitely broker dependent. The same version ea, will produce different results with one broker/account type and the other. The posted charts are of Traders-Trust's pro account. So when you evaluate various versions of xm7 ea, DO compare them with the same broker/account type, not with different ones.
Swimming with sharks!
- #19,890
- Oct 29, 2020 3:56am Oct 29, 2020 3:56am
I wish there were many more days like today when manually managed live basket collected +100pips in 20 minutes 
Its been very rocky journey for live account during October but as I skip trading tomorrow then monthly return is +7%. Need to keep discipline and be careful out there.
Tomorrow will post demo Default Daily monthly statistics for October as well. Hope to compare it with some of you guys as well.
Cheers,
I
Its been very rocky journey for live account during October but as I skip trading tomorrow then monthly return is +7%. Need to keep discipline and be careful out there.
Tomorrow will post demo Default Daily monthly statistics for October as well. Hope to compare it with some of you guys as well.
Cheers,
I
- #19,896
- Nov 2, 2020 4:02am Nov 2, 2020 4:02am
- Joined May 2017 | Status: Trader | 3,883 Posts
Truth is like poetry. And most people f*cking hate poetry.
- #19,897
- Nov 2, 2020 4:36am Nov 2, 2020 4:36am
Good to see some trade updates! 23.06 is different animal and very sensitive to MA type as I discovered and also trade level needs calibration as 23.xx is less volatile in trade strenghts than 17.xx.
1) By the way - how was the October for your default daily basket? I am really curious because it was a bloodbath for mine, ending -30% in October.
2) Also, could you comment on some fundamental VB logic for default daily basket? As it goes, the Daily Basket does not update VB after the VB is triggered. To me it seems very strange, because during VB operation trade suggestions can change quite a lot and in many cases it has opened RB without original trade suggestions because it just ignores them as it should by chosen setting. Like today - as you can see only 2 pairs in RB are the ones which still have trade suggestions open. Screenshot taken just few minutes after RB opening. Lets skip the "consistency in 10 month forward testing etc." argument because all what we have seen over last months is that the results of the default DB are wildly different between brokers and users. I am using in my live account the setting which updates the VB all the time and it has proven to be over last 2 months much safer and profitable option. Why should we not trust the indicator settings during VB operation and only use snapshot of trade suggestions what is done by default DB?
1) By the way - how was the October for your default daily basket? I am really curious because it was a bloodbath for mine, ending -30% in October.
2) Also, could you comment on some fundamental VB logic for default daily basket? As it goes, the Daily Basket does not update VB after the VB is triggered. To me it seems very strange, because during VB operation trade suggestions can change quite a lot and in many cases it has opened RB without original trade suggestions because it just ignores them as it should by chosen setting. Like today - as you can see only 2 pairs in RB are the ones which still have trade suggestions open. Screenshot taken just few minutes after RB opening. Lets skip the "consistency in 10 month forward testing etc." argument because all what we have seen over last months is that the results of the default DB are wildly different between brokers and users. I am using in my live account the setting which updates the VB all the time and it has proven to be over last 2 months much safer and profitable option. Why should we not trust the indicator settings during VB operation and only use snapshot of trade suggestions what is done by default DB?
Monday weekly basket VB did not trigger so no trade this week. The demo test of v23.06 hit SL.
- #19,898
- Nov 2, 2020 7:01am Nov 2, 2020 7:01am
- Joined May 2017 | Status: Trader | 3,883 Posts
Truth is like poetry. And most people f*cking hate poetry.
- #19,899
- Nov 2, 2020 7:28am Nov 2, 2020 7:28am
Thanks, I agree that there are many variations at play and different combinations actually can work...or can't.
Todays Default Daily hit profit just now, main work was done with 2 pairs which indicator suggested. Other 2 which disappeared from trade suggestions fortunately did not do much damage during the day.
One troublesome issue raised its head - EA v88 was very slow to respond to close basket which had hit the TP target already 10 minutes ago. Initially I thought the EA was freezed but eventually it decided to take profit out at 2.95%. Which is fine but makes me slightly uneasy if the profit would have dropped below TP target during this time.
I hope Jess will find some time to look over the reported issues with v93. I can't make switch now because v93 is not handling the VB right way.
Do you happen to know why was the idea of having option in EA to measure only positive trade contributions to VB upper trigger was not implemented? Its very frustrating to watch VB struggle because 2-3 pairs out of 6-8 stop the RB from triggering. And when the RB is opened, a lot of good momentum is lost.
Take care,
I
Todays Default Daily hit profit just now, main work was done with 2 pairs which indicator suggested. Other 2 which disappeared from trade suggestions fortunately did not do much damage during the day.
One troublesome issue raised its head - EA v88 was very slow to respond to close basket which had hit the TP target already 10 minutes ago. Initially I thought the EA was freezed but eventually it decided to take profit out at 2.95%. Which is fine but makes me slightly uneasy if the profit would have dropped below TP target during this time.
I hope Jess will find some time to look over the reported issues with v93. I can't make switch now because v93 is not handling the VB right way.
Do you happen to know why was the idea of having option in EA to measure only positive trade contributions to VB upper trigger was not implemented? Its very frustrating to watch VB struggle because 2-3 pairs out of 6-8 stop the RB from triggering. And when the RB is opened, a lot of good momentum is lost.
Take care,
I
{quote} My live daily basket closed Oct with around -7%, the 2nd losing month of the year. A while back the option of updating the VB as suggestions from the indicator changed was covered, and as there were many opinions of it Jess added the option to use it or not. I prefer to use the pairs in the VB as that is whats worked for me, and if you prefer the other way and it works for you that's fine. This is the great thing with the EA, there are many variations that can be tried and tested.
- #19,900
- Nov 3, 2020 3:18am Nov 3, 2020 3:18am
Attention! I am telling you once again that something is wrong with the EA v93 and how it handles Virtual Baskets.
Check the screenshot: I have set EA to continue to update VB and I have set EA to add new trade suggestions to RB. As you can see, it has not added AF, NJ and NU pairs to RB, even though they meet the VB triggers and pip threshold of 3 pips.
I have outlined the v93 issues to Jess multiple times and hopefully he will be able to check what is wrong there.
Also, I have asked Jess to add option for VB to calculate upper trigger based only on the positive pairs - this should help to pick only the winners to RB more quickly and avoid few pairs dragging the VB down.
So if you feel that v93 is a perfect weapon for you, go ahead. I am sticking to v88 (and its bug of adding too much pairs into RB sometimes).
Cheers,
I
Check the screenshot: I have set EA to continue to update VB and I have set EA to add new trade suggestions to RB. As you can see, it has not added AF, NJ and NU pairs to RB, even though they meet the VB triggers and pip threshold of 3 pips.
I have outlined the v93 issues to Jess multiple times and hopefully he will be able to check what is wrong there.
Also, I have asked Jess to add option for VB to calculate upper trigger based only on the positive pairs - this should help to pick only the winners to RB more quickly and avoid few pairs dragging the VB down.
So if you feel that v93 is a perfect weapon for you, go ahead. I am sticking to v88 (and its bug of adding too much pairs into RB sometimes).
Cheers,
I