Current price 1.2600.
470 pips.
Intraday only.
Why is GBPUSD called cable? 67 replies
Cable Update - Continued 102 replies
Cable (GBPUSD) vs Euro (EURUSD) 31 replies
Cable Update (GBP/USD) without Idiots 23 replies
cable short for gbpusd? 6 replies
Disliked{quote} Buy entry based on daily MACD is around 1.2130 in line with my chart. On the 30 th october. Current price 1.2600. 470 pips. {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes, yes, you and your recycled memes. Go spam some more profiles.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Nah. If I enable shouts will you spam my profile? Absolute loser. I wonder what your end game is.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I looked at the chart again. Monday selling is very much possible if 4hr starts printing bearish signal. until now not. 2616 resistance to hold/will hold. Sellers need to set stop at 2616 + spread.Ignored
Hidden
Disliked{quote} Have you tried it? I attempted to use GPT4 (both from OpenAI and Microsoft) for python coding and was very frustrated as the application continuously lost context from the overall structure to the subroutines that I was trying to build to execute the design.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Like I said... DOA... Dead On Arrival. Monday has no reason to be at all remarkable, only in how unremarkable of a day it is likely to be. The price doesn't need to meet anything - never has, never will. Let's see the market prove me wrong after Monday and I'll take the fail. I'll be shaking my head seeing everyone in here trading up a storm on a dead market.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Wow, there is some bad advice offered in this thread and this is amongst it. There is no reason why any average Monday should be any different than any other average day, scheduled and unscheduled event risks notwithstanding. Re this Monday coming, yes some U.s traders might still be on a long Thanksgiving weekend break but other than that there is no reason not to trade it. If you have any empirical documented evidence to back up your assertion re Monday please post it, otherwise the thread should treat your advice with caution because...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Have you tried it? I attempted to use GPT4 (both from OpenAI and Microsoft) for python coding and was very frustrated as the application continuously lost context from the overall structure to the subroutines that I was trying to build to execute the design.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Also try running your request several times. I tried it with a simple looping code with a timer request. I ran it 7 times, changing just a few words that do not affect the main algorithm. For example, "Create a script . . ." vs "Create an indicator . . ." or added "non-blocking code". I got 5 different ways of coding it. Four were quite similar. The 5th was very different.Ignored
Disliked{quote} It appears as if somebody pissed in his corn flakes. His posts don't appear to have been as misleading, rude or insulting in the past. Monday, I agree with you and believe it is just trade what you see.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Were you pleased with any of the results or was it simply an exercise? I have been reading about GPT5. it appears to be on a different level. Looking forward to trying it.Ignored