This is daily time frame. I see this.
Intraday only.
3
Cable Update - Continued 102 replies
Cable (GBPUSD) vs Euro (EURUSD) 31 replies
Cable Update (GBP/USD) without Idiots 23 replies
Why is GBPUSD called cable? 66 replies
cable short for gbpusd? 6 replies
Disliked{quote} You must not be getting your coffee from Starbucks cuz here it's $2.95 for them! Its the only coffee my wife drinksIgnored
DislikedThey're playing their game very well but we don't care. See my pics plz. UP. {image}Ignored
Dislikedyes yes yes !!!! from 160 $ floating lose . to 115 $ profit and all out !!!! went to sleep with the lose , and woke out just now to close it with a a profit 460 $ profit from 190 $ account in 2 days !!!! {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} I don’t know if you’re gambling or trading … all I know is your results speaks for you … well done moty …Ignored
Disliked{quote} i am trading , and gambling the trading part is for taking the right position most of the time the gambling part is for not withdrawal when i have more then 300 $ in the account , because i am getting in with full margin every time , and i can be right 100 time and lost everything with 1 wrong time for 100 pips wrong move because my leverage is 1 to 100 so 1 pips is always equal to 1 % of my equityIgnored
Disliked{quote} btw I’ve noticed you SCALE IN ….as in placing a trade with 0.1 then as it goes in your Favour … you add positions ..I think it’s brilliant … you have your own way you trade maybe not the conventional way but your way and it works … I just wanted to commend you that’s all .. albeit your strategy is really really risky I must sayIgnored
Disliked{quote} This strategy works brilliantly when market keeps moving in your planned direction. If there is a reversal while your trades are open, it's going to hurt your account pretty bad.Ignored
Disliked{quote} obviously that’s why I said her strategy is quite risky , but if I wanted to Scale in there must be confluences before you add positions (at least that’s what I believe ) … like market structure etc ….Ignored