????
Attached Image
- #1,906
- Mar 24, 2017 12:49am Mar 24, 2017 12:49am
- Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Hoc Etiam Transibit.... | 6,085 Posts
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
- #1,908
- Mar 24, 2017 5:29am Mar 24, 2017 5:29am
Thanks, bro! {image}
Is Joice better than ZUP or PZ harmonics?
Here is some basics features of Harmonic Joicy:
1> You can select particular historical pattern to view it more carefully.
With GBPUSD-H4, we have 3 patterns.
Then select one:
2> You can watch others Symbols/TimeFrame in Panel.
Completed Patterns:
Emerging Patterns:
- #1,910
- Mar 24, 2017 5:49am Mar 24, 2017 5:49am
- Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Hoc Etiam Transibit.... | 6,085 Posts
{quote} You're welcome! {quote} unless you try it out, I can't really say. Here is some basics features of Harmonic Joicy: 1> You can select particular historical pattern to view it more carefully. With GBPUSD-H4, we have 3 patterns. {image} Then select one: {image} 2> You can watch others Symbols/TimeFrame in Panel. Completed Patterns: {image} Emerging Patterns: {image}
What will be the cost of this product?
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
- #1,911
- Mar 24, 2017 5:52am Mar 24, 2017 5:52am
2 MarkJoy add - ID indi for several indicators with different dimension of ZZ - colour rations - shift down names of patterns from several indicators
- For ZZ, you can use ZigZagDepth (default value is 12). It is standard ZZ
- For colour rations, you can change color of bull color, bear color, or enable a particular pattern color
Currently you can't change the color transparency, but I will add this in next release
"- shift down names of patterns from several indicators" Can you give me an example?
- #1,912
- Mar 24, 2017 6:10am Mar 24, 2017 6:10am
- Joined Apr 2011 | Status: Hoc Etiam Transibit.... | 6,085 Posts
Compared Formationseeker with Joicy:
What made this difference? Algorithm difference?
I like Formationseeker but it's just too expensive...
What made this difference? Algorithm difference?
I like Formationseeker but it's just too expensive...
Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication - Leonardo da Vinci
- #1,913
- Edited 8:16am Mar 24, 2017 6:12am | Edited 8:16am
{quote} Thank you Mark. I just installed it and I am playing it around now. Its look and feel is somewhat similar to Scott Carney's Formation Seeker system by the way... (any relationship with his system?)
Some known issues:
1> PRZ calculation, SL calculation, TP calculation are not completed.
2> Chart crashes unexpectedly when reconfigure "Joicy Panel"** instance of the indicator.
--> Workaround: Close current "Joicy Panel", add new one and configure when adding.
** There is 2 kinds of Joicy indicator: normal "Joicy" and "Joicy Panel"
To confige one as "Joicy Panel", set isJoicyPanel to true
"Joicy Panel" instance is used to load data an calculate for other Symbols/TimeFrames. So only one "Joicy Panel" is needed.
The instance which is configured as "Joicy Panel" will have the below TEXT.
- #1,915
- Mar 24, 2017 6:24am Mar 24, 2017 6:24am
Compared Formationseeker with Joicy: What made this difference? Algorithm difference? {image} {image} I like Formationseeker but it's just too expensive...
Give some feedback to improve the Algorithm if you found it not accurate as you want.
I use 4 ZUP with different ZZ sizes. At each indicator the unique ID that indicators didn't interfere with each other. The name of a pattern can be displaced down or up, then at once it is clear to what ZZ has drawn a pattern {image}
- #1,919
- Mar 24, 2017 6:58am Mar 24, 2017 6:58am
what percent of the admission of the rations? why AC=1.0, not 1.128 {image}
GU H4 it is not cypher cypher need XC=1.414-1.272 XA {image} {image}
Real values are:
XAB: 0.380 - ideal value is 0.382
ABC: 1.126 - ideal value is 1.272
BCD: 2.033 - no ideal value
XAD: 0.822 - ideal value is 0.786
There is some tolerance in the calculation