Hi Bauta,
On 1 of demo accounts I encountered a strange issue today: EG104 in Channel mode opened about 190 positions on gbpusd with minimal lot, exceeded max opened orders limit on account and still trying to open more orders (as I see from logs it shows error 148). What could be the issue?
Thanks,
Hi Bauta, On 1 of demo accounts I encountered a strange issue today: EG104 in Channel mode opened about 190 positions on gbpusd with minimal lot, exceeded max opened orders limit on account and still trying to open more orders (as I see from logs it shows error 148). What could be the issue? Thanks, {image}
Ignored
Please download the last release on post one. I do recommend 037
the issue has been fixed there. Anyway, I will revise it again.
thanks, bauta
What is new on Release 037
Dynamic expansion is now calculated using the distance between the highest order to the lowest order in the set.
Example: Dynamic_Percent_Increase=20
Lowest buy order is at 1.05600
Highest buy order is at 1.05900
Expansion = (1.05900-1.05600)*20/100;
Expansion = 0.0006
Next blue/execution line will be at 1.05900+0.0006 = 1.05960 (six pips)
Dynamic expansion is now calculated using the distance between the highest order to the lowest order in the set
Ignored
Hello Bauta.
so what did it solve and why is it better?
Also, when will you be done with new algorithm that changes from symmetry to chanel in trending markets.
What is new on Release 037 Dynamic expansion is now calculated using the distance between the highest order to the lowest order in the set. Example: Dynamic_Percent_Increase=20 Lowest buy order is at 1.05600 Highest buy order is at 1.05900 Expansion = (1.05900-1.05600)*20/100; Expansion = 0.0006 Next blue/execution line will be at 1.05900+0.0006 = 1.05960 (six pips) some performance and order placing optimization. Please download 037 on post one. thanks, bauta
Ignored
Hi Bauta,
How was calculation for previous Dynamic expansion?
Thanks
Mohsen
Could you please do a little change in Neutralize set up? I rather to get one opposite order instead of several orders because managing one order manually is much easier. Imagine that you want to set SL or Tp for opposite orders manually and then it might needed to adjust or remove them so when market is moving fast it is impossible to be enough fast for adjusting all opposite orders.
In case you decided to do that, NTZD condition should be much more visible like using big font and colorful to be noticeable easier. Now that small NTZD letter in left hand side of screen and getting several opposite orders plus big negative balance on the chart can are good combination for trader to notice it but in new set up (if agree to do so ) a more visual alarm can be a good alert.
Please check and reply.
Thanks
Mohsen
Hi Bauta, Could you please do a little change in Neutralize set up? I rather to get one opposite order instead of several orders because managing one order manually is much easier. Imagine that you want to set SL or Tp for opposite orders manually and then it might needed to adjust or remove them so when market is moving fast it is impossible to be enough fast for adjusting all opposite orders. In case you decided to do that, NTZD condition should be much more visible like using big font and colorful to be noticeable easier. Now that small NTZD...
Ignored
This post may help: Post 1,026: Trading with lines
thanks, bauta
Hi,Guys!
Can I make some Back tests with EG104_DayTarget? I want to test EG104_DayTarget with tick data of EURUSD of 2013.1.1-2016.10.25, but did not open trades!
Why?
