Disliked{quote} What Bags is an index now..?!Lets trade Bags then.. I say long Bags
Ignored
- #1,558
- Sep 13, 2016 10:49am Sep 13, 2016 10:49am
- Joined Jun 2009 | Status: coitus interruptus | 1,115 Posts
practising coitus interruptus
Firebird EA, please test this one, it is one of the greats 1,228 replies
One for all. All for one. 6 replies
One small step for man... One Giant leap for mabenn? 5 replies
How to run one on more than one pair and time Frame at the same time? 1 reply
two version of FF tunnel Chart, one say down, one say up, which one is correct? 3 replies
Dislikedpretty interresting to watch his returns.. anyone else sees what iam seeing ? when vola picks up (retrurns) he is barely breaking even when its quite he has some amazeballs gains... hmmm...no need to reverse engineer his trades {image}
Ignored
Disliked{quote} to make it short.. its not the entries.. but his MM basically.. "gambling" cool to watch for sure just be aware that its not suistanable .. and should only be considered for fun.. and some
Ignored
Disliked{quote} not really ,, probably quite the opposite.. i assume i was refering to the volatility in his return statements.. wich is huge when he is enduring a losing streak ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Every trade ever taken is a gamble else you wouldn't place stops. Stops are the negative expressions of saying 'what if I am wrong' I'll bet you have been stopped out a few times therefore you gambled and lost. What we see here is Bags going for the direction he feels is the correct one and backing that with the prior profits he has made. He is therefore reinvesting his profits for higher returns. I put it you you then that you are the gambler and Bags is the trader. As for it being sustainable that is just you wishfully thinking it so.Ignored
Disliked{quote} .. but his MM basically.. "gambling" cool to watch for sure just be aware that its not suistanable .. and should only be considered for funIgnored
Disliked{quote} his "money management" strategy is what makes or breaks his approach , he changes his lot size based on gains/losses however what type of MM he is using ie.. negative/positive progression or a mix of thereof , iam not sure but he tries to follow "trend " whatever he uses to deterimine a trend , in collaboration with a MM which is based on "gamblers fallacy" there are many forms of progressions most famous one beeing Martingale .. or D`alambert , labouchere, or even more obscure ones like the 6 point divisor.. however its all from "betting"...Ignored