Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Dynamic Fibonacci Grid 1,215 replies

Dynamic TakeProfit & Dynamic StopLoss EA/AI/Algorithm 0 replies

Dynamic Fibonacci Grid - interactive trading 279 replies

Martingale EA Dynamic Grid, Multipler 1.6 0 replies

Grid, Burst Grid, Grid Risk and Grid Profit 1 reply

Attachments: Autop Dynamic Grid EA - Enhanced version of Auto-Profit 3.0
Exit Attachments

Autop Dynamic Grid EA - Enhanced version of Auto-Profit 3.0

  • Linked: PaGaLeO ByEXPO4H | Brokerage Account XXXXXX31
  • Expand
  • Last Sync: Apr 26, 2017
Apr 26, 2017
Last Sync: Apr 26, 2017
Apr 26, 2017
Last Sync: Apr 26, 2017
Apr 26, 2017
Last Sync: Apr 26, 2017
Apr 26, 2017
Last Sync: Apr 26, 2017
to
No trading activity in this period.
Quoting Edorenta
{quote} Please switch the setting "Close the hedge as time-filter switches off" off as I said above, the error comes from there
Thank You..
Hi Edorenta, first, thanks for all your hard work and sharing it here. It is appreciated. Subscribed to thread. Started testing on a demo starting today. I'm running V5.2 on 3 pairs, AUDUSD, USDCAD, and USDJPY, starting with a Bal of US$1000. The last time I tested one of the grid EAs the DDs were so bad I never bothered with it much. I'll let this run 24/7 for a few days and see what happens. Thanks again.
[quote=troya7634;9038338]{quote} I tried to backtest those set files but I cant do it. This message appears a lot of days and i dont know why (my lot is correct, 0.1) The problem appears in one and two set files both.

hi edorenta, and everybody.
BT with v5.2 returns the same problem than reported with previous version one; any idea about this?

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Captura.JPG Size: 305 KB
Learning
hi am getting this

auto v5.2 EURUSD,M5:0.02Error: 0

any help guys.

Cheers Paul
Hi Edo,

many thanks for the upgrade. Can we add a feature, stealth mode (meaning tp levels are invisible to brokers)? if we set TP levels as visible levels to brokers, i am afraid sometimes some brokers may play around with quotes and not get us filled.

many thanks !
Pips Collector EA, No Martingale, No Grid
Quoting huatboyz
Hi Edo, many thanks for the upgrade. Can we add a feature, stealth mode (meaning tp levels are invisible to brokers)? if we set TP levels as visible levels to brokers, i am afraid sometimes some brokers may play around with quotes and not get us filled. many thanks !
@Edo: Push! I already also thought about that option - but I think because we have such a nice cockpit in this EA we should see the actual TP target there?

Btw. the 4.3 and 5.1 BT from my recent post is running in 5.2 now... Feedback comming.

Cheers
@Edorenta

Thank you for this very promising EA. Currently I am running a "tick level" backtest on M1 EURUSD data from 2012 and the preliminary results of the first 4 months (shown below) look pretty good.

(Backtesting this EA on M1 "tick level" is somewhat slow: analyzing 1 month's data takes almost 1 hour, so the final result is expected in about 2 days from now...)

I wonder if it was possible to incorporate a "Risk Setting" parameter which could be used as an alternative for a fixed starting lot size.

In other words: the EA would automatically calculate and adjust the starting lot size based on the actual current balance.

For example: Risk Setting: 1 = 0.01 lot/$1k (as trading 0.01 lot equals approx. $1k) while Risk Setting: 0 would mean using the current fixed starting lot size.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Autop Dynamic Grid EA.png Size: 17 KB

P.S. Unfortunately my backtest has stopped with an "Ordermodify error"...
Attached Image
Quoting MasterGuru
@Edorenta Thank you for this very promising EA. Currently I am running a "tick level" backtest on M1 data from 2012 and the preliminary results of the first 4 months (shown below) look pretty good. (Backtesting this EA on M1 "tick level" is somewhat slow: analyzing 1 month's data takes almost 1 hour, so the final result is expected in about 2 days from now...) I wonder if it was possible to incorporate a "Risk Setting" parameter which could be used as an alternative for a fixed starting lot size. In other words the...
Hi,that is already possible. It is % based. Set fixed Lot size to false and choose % value two options below. I already tested it, proven working.CheersBarlam
Quoting Barlam
{quote} Hi,that is already possible. IT is % based. I altes tested it, proven working.CheersBarlam
@Barlam

Thanks! In my backtest the balance has almost doubled in the first four months of 2012 (from $3000 to $5400), but the starting lot size is still 0.01.

I guess I have to wait for the balance to grow more to see the automatic lot size increase. For example: if the base "Risk setting" were 0.01/$10k then it will take about 1.5 year to see the first lot size adjutment in my ongoing $3k deposit backtest.
Two pairs, v5.1 and v5.2 identical settings on M1, too good to be true
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image1.png Size: 36 KB
Quoting andres11617
Two pairs, v5.1 and v5.2 identical settings on M1, too good to be true {image}
Hi andres, Would you mind to post the set once more? Good work mate!
okay, here..
Attached File(s)
File Type: txt AO5.2 andresv2 .txt   2 KB | 698 downloads
one question, what if during news time e.g. ECB conference and we have some open positions, this is potentially a risk? any solutions to avoid the potential huge drawdown?
Pips Collector EA, No Martingale, No Grid
Quoting Barlam
{quote} Hi andres, Would you mind to post the set once more? Good work mate!
and another demo acc. v5.1 today. I am testing several pairs on many accounts. This account produces more gain but I prefer settings in my post 212
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image1.png Size: 35 KB
Attached Image
Quoting andres11617
{quote} and another demo acc. v5.1 today. I am testing several pairs on many accounts. This account produces more gain but I prefer settings in my post 212 {image} {image}
Sorry, wrong picture regarding my settings above
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Image1.png Size: 35 KB
I want to ask, it must to add adx and adxma indi to the chart? it has any correlation with the parameter set? and if it has correlation. the value of adx is different. on default set is 35 and 10 (linear weighted) and in the indi is 150 and 25 (simple) method. it must to change? or just follow the default?
Any chance you can improve backtesting speed? Disabling the infobox doesn't improve speeds at all. Thanks for all your hard work on the development!
I have also OrderModify error 130 which block the backtest.​
And on my side, it takes few hours to test 1 month on m1 chart tick data.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 001.PNG Size: 52 KB
Quoting Sunnybeach
I have also OrderModify error 130 which block the backtest.​ And on my side, it takes few hours to test 1 month on m1 chart tick data. {image}
Same here EDO...

Another suggestion, i don't know if this is possible, as we know this EA in ranging markets is 100% secure, in a large trend that's when the problem occur. As the distinctive feature of this EA is the fact that it expands the grid when there is a trend, and you already inserted the hedge feature, we could also increase the lot size in the hedge size by simple increment and the retracement side with the normal multiplier.

So for a 2 multiplier it would work like this.

Retracement side - 0,01;0,02; 0,04; 0,08; 0,16; 0,32; 0,64; 1,28

Hedge (trend side) - 0,01; 0,02; 0,03; 0,04; 0,05; 0,06; 0,07; 0,08

If it's not that easy to do.. at least take something from the idea..cause i think it could prevent a larger DD..

Thanks EDO
0 traders viewing now