Disliked{quote} Hedging is easy to implement. Getting out of a hedged scenario (profitably) is not so easy... How would you recommend this be done? Regards VladIgnored
This is not kind of Hedging you are talking about.
No one wants to be defeated~
Dynamic Fibonacci Grid 1,227 replies
Dynamic Fibonacci Grid - interactive trading 281 replies
Dynamic TakeProfit & Dynamic StopLoss EA/AI/Algorithm 0 replies
Disliked{quote} Hedging is easy to implement. Getting out of a hedged scenario (profitably) is not so easy... How would you recommend this be done? Regards VladIgnored
Disliked{quote} Thank you for sharing your approach. I'll look into it. Btw could you tell me what version of MT4 you're using and what's your screen resolution? I ran some tests on several computers and my InfoBox looks much better on my screens than it does on yours, no idea why{image}
Ignored
DislikedAs I told before, I'm running two charts, one with just "sell" orders and one with just bye "orders", it works with no problems. Of course the profit from the "trend" order is minimal cause it only opens the smallest lot and closes in TP in the direction of the trend, while the other order is increasing lot sizes (martingale) doing it's normal retracement behavior, nevertheless, is some profit.Ignored
Disliked{quote}There is a change you have not mentioned my friend.... If we turn the ADX filter on, why EA will slow down the lots increase rate? That's good but how does it work?Ignored
Disliked{quote} I'll try something similar. I think that the EA misses counter-cycle opportunities as it gets stuck in a position waiting for a retracement. Could you share your early results? Are you using the ADX trend filter? CheersIgnored
DislikedAs I told before, I'm running two charts, one with just "sell" orders and one with just bye "orders", it works with no problems. Of course the profit from the "trending" order is minimal cause it only opens the smallest lot and closes in TP in the direction of the trend, while the other order is increasing lot sizes (martingale) doing it's normal retracement behavior, nevertheless, is some profit. I can't see other way to do this without get stuck in "hedge open positions problems" (other than the one that EG104 does). We could also increase the...Ignored
Disliked{quote} ok, pls. test it on MAY 31th G/U M5. you will find the difference.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I don't know it it's the same thing, but I have one open cycle now of buy orders, while the trend is down, and the orders are 0,02, 0,02, 0,04 , 0,06 and 0,02 again? Shouldn't it be 0,12?Ignored
DislikedAt first I thought about that, but it opened the order in the same step size, and with the same TP of the others orders :S Wait, I did reload MT4 to test the AP3 version...maybe it's that... Now, with the AP3 version this problem is solved?Ignored
DislikedJust one more thing, not wanting to overpost or monopolize the thread. I've tried to change the settings as your suggestion to create a scalping version, that would work on ranging markets, and I did with some success. It opens and closes orders successively, but sometimes, when the order goes in the direction of the trend, it doesn't close the order in profit, and keep it open for a long time. Anyway to overcome this without manually closing the order? Or it's a problem in my settings?Ignored