WinningSolution System-EA | Page 10 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Please suggest a simple & effective Method/System of "Trading System" Forum to newbie 182 replies

The System Behind the System, by Merlin Jeffries 16 replies

200 Ema system - help me build a system ! 19 replies

Knife system, Vegas 4h system related questions. 4 replies

Would you trade this system? New system #2. 10 replies

Attachments: WinningSolution System-EA
Exit Attachments

WinningSolution System-EA

  • #181
  • Jul 11, 2016 10:32pm Jul 11, 2016 10:32pm
Quoting tradability
{quote} My point of view is that not one EA can do the job alone, they will ultimately fail at some point/s it must be a combination of EA and human intervention. That will be the best solution because an EA is a prescribed set of rules and unfortunately the market does not have a set of rules it follows. So it is ok to use any EA with low risk set and let human intervention take place to produce the best results possible. Good luck in your trading.
I'm still confused.....after so many years....

We will use human intervention at certain days or some special NEWS release.

Beside that, i think we have programmed everything into our EAs.

If EA failed, so did the manual operation.

Would you like to show me a way out？or is there any chances you can share your exp. on it?
No one wants to be defeated~
  • #182
  • Jul 11, 2016 11:56pm Jul 11, 2016 11:56pm
Quoting jonirrenicus
{quote} I'm still confused.....after so many years.... We will use human intervention at certain days or some special NEWS release. Beside that, i think we have programmed everything into our EAs. If EA failed, so did the manual operation. Would you like to show me a way out？or is there any chances you can share your exp. on it?
I don't understand what you are saying.
One couldn't have programmed everything into an EA what an EA has been designed for is a specific strategy with specific rules.
So let me try and enlighten you why an EA does not always work... if your EA say was in $500 profit using 3 open orders all of which are 0.1 and the EA didn't close them when you see momentum deflating, so you would not intervene and let them continue until closed even if there are losing rapidly?

Secondly if software was so good then why isn't the best EA making trillions and owning the market? Software can serve as a good basis BUT nothing can replace the human mind... NOTHING... since the world is run by humans and not software, hence unpredictable events and the markets move because of human nature of some sort whether it be news or just some changing events, and not due to software, hence why markets are unpredictable.
  • #183
  • Jul 12, 2016 1:40am Jul 12, 2016 1:40am
Quoting tradability
{quote} I don't understand what you are saying. One couldn't have programmed everything into an EA what an EA has been designed for is a specific strategy with specific rules. So let me try and enlighten you why an EA does not always work... if your EA say was in $500 profit using 3 open orders all of which are 0.1 and the EA didn't close them when you see momentum deflating, so you would not intervene and let them continue until closed even if there are losing rapidly? Secondly if software was so good then why isn't the best EA making trillions...
Not just one EA.

for EX, i have 2 EAs one is 100% win in Trending conditions another is a reversed version which is 100% win in ranging markets.

I manually switch them one to another according to market conditions, but I still can't win.

Human intervention is NOT 100% CORRECT.

I see you have many winner strategies in your explorer, can you share the EXP. about when to switch EAs?
No one wants to be defeated~
  • #184
  • Jul 12, 2016 2:04am Jul 12, 2016 2:04am
Quoting jonirrenicus
{quote} Not just one EA. for EX, i have 2 EAs one is 100% win in Trending conditions another is a reversed version which is 100% win in ranging markets. I manually switch them one to another according to market conditions, but I still can't win. Human intervention is NOT 100% CORRECT. I see you have many winner strategies in your explorer, can you share the EXP. about when to switch EAs?
I like you, developed my own two EA's. Like many EA's they take winners and there will always be many a time where the EA will get into a bad situation, once I first notice it's going to that mode and that is usually under certain market conditions I take over and try to use my trading skills to either come out of the situation winning or close out the open orders at the smallest loss possible.

You are right when you say human intervention is not 100% correct. There has been many instances when I closed the trades at a loss when the EA would have closed them at a win instance and vice versa. The bottom line is the overall results must achieve a favourable outcome and you as the human trader must succeed in managing the open trades in order to succee\d..
  • #185
  • Jul 12, 2016 2:46am Jul 12, 2016 2:46am
Quoting tradability
{quote} I like you, developed my own two EA's. Like many EA's they take winners and there will always be many a time where the EA will get into a bad situation, once I first notice it's going to that mode and that is usually under certain market conditions I take over and try to use my trading skills to either come out of the situation winning or close out the open orders at the smallest loss possible. You are right when you say human intervention is not 100% correct. There has been many instances when I closed the trades at a loss when the EA would...
After all this you have been through....you know how hard it is to develop a winner EA...

When EA got into bad situation , I never had a chance to fix it. That's why I'm here, i had a terrible EA and i screwed up..

I think Ducd's EA is a good trend trading EA with crazy lots increase, that's what i'm looking for.

If you know who has a better strategy, pls. show me the link, i 'm really appreciated!
No one wants to be defeated~
  • #186
  • Jul 13, 2016 9:17am Jul 13, 2016 9:17am
Hi Guys

I've been testing this EA for weeks now, trying to turn a decent profit over a period of 1 1/2 years, so last night I tested EURUSD on a M30 chart attached is my results, it has a major draw down but it survived a year, trading with 0.10 lot.

Looking out for you thoughts
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 30min winningsolution.PNG Size: 23 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: graph 30min.PNG Size: 20 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: 1 Year.PNG Size: 16 KB
  • #187
  • Jul 13, 2016 5:01pm Jul 13, 2016 5:01pm
Quoting Waterkloof
Hi Guys I've been testing this EA for weeks now, trying to turn a decent profit over a period of 1 1/2 years, so last night I tested EURUSD on a M30 chart attached is my results, it has a major draw down but it survived a year, trading with 0.10 lot. Looking out for you thoughts {image} {image} {image}

LOL @ your results... martingales always blow up. The fact that you played around to get nice results is proof that your money management won't survive long in the live market. especially when you used such a big lot multiple to get those results. Thats old increasing the lot size rapidly and only works very short term.
But keep wasting your time and hopefully you open up an account with $200k or more in it and trade it using your lot sizing to get my attention lol
  • #188
  • Jul 13, 2016 10:51pm Jul 13, 2016 10:51pm
Quoting tradability
{quote} LOL @ your results... martingales always blow up. The fact that you played around to get nice results is proof that your money management won't survive long in the live market. especially when you used such a big lot multiple to get those results. Thats old increasing the lot size rapidly and only works very short term. But keep wasting your time and hopefully you open up an account with $200k or more in it and trade it using your lot sizing to get my attention lol
You do not know exactly how my EA doing.
I said many times, if you mean when a trader increase lots size - he use martingales, you made big mistake.
Again, my EA not use martingales!

Try to backtest it with spreate year, start with balance I suggested and see how it growing.
  • #189
  • Jul 13, 2016 11:19pm Jul 13, 2016 11:19pm
Quoting Ducdaovn
{quote} You do not know exactly how my EA doing. I said many times, if you mean when a trader increase lots size - he use martingales, you made big mistake. Again, my EA not use martingales! Try to backtest it with spreate year, start with balance I suggested and see how it growing.

It looks like you have no idea what is a martingale. It is very clear from your output that that you presented you are using lot size increments which are multiples. That is very clear from the green spike at the bottom of your graph that you presented but it seems you are ignoring that fact so expose the tests done per order and you will see precisely what I said is true. But you are hoping to fool inexperienced traders and you will fool them, unfortunately I have done more backtests then you have grey cells.
My concern now is that you only show graphs and not the output because you don't want to expose the fact you are using martingales and I know what path you are taking.
You want to sell your system eventually. Face reality no one does anything for nothing unless they know they will gain something from it.

In fact let's see how good I am at detecting liars.. you are using about a 3 to 1 factor in lot size increases and you just might be hedging, that part I can't tell for sure.
You might fool 90% of people here but I got the edge on you.
GO AHEAD PROVE ME WRONG AND SHOW THE GRAPH WITH OUTPUT lol

P.S If you didn't use martingale you won't get green spikes on the bottom or sometimes you just get all equal spikes.
  • #190
  • Jul 13, 2016 11:40pm Jul 13, 2016 11:40pm
Quoting tradability
{quote} It looks like you have no idea what is a martingale. It is very clear from your output that that you presented you are using lot size increments which are multiples. That is very clear from the green spike at the bottom of your graph that you presented but it seems you are ignoring that fact so expose the tests done per order and you will see precisely what I said is true. But you are hoping to fool inexperienced traders and you will fool them, unfortunately I have done more backtests then you have grey cells. My concern now is that you...
Go and read through thread from post 1.
I have never say I want to sell anything here. Never suggest anyone use it with live account.
I show you here my EA, how it doing.
I asked you (Everybody) take a backtest, and find out the best setting => WHY/FOR WHAT? - I said many times, the current version EA for backtest only, to know how it doing, good or bad, profitable or not. Final version still in construction.
I don't understand what you call "GRAPH WITH OUTPUT" (My English is not good, in some case, I have problem to understand), if you mean source code, go away.

Last word. take care what you said. How you detected liars here? What is liars here? For what?
Please don't think anyone as bad as you.
  • #191
  • Jul 14, 2016 12:22am Jul 14, 2016 12:22am
Any body using on live account above said EA
Please up date
  • #192
  • Jul 14, 2016 3:59am Jul 14, 2016 3:59am
Tradability, if you are such an experienced trader, why are you even part of this forum, I think as traders we need to support each other, yes I agree this EA has the potential to blow your account very fast, but also have the potential to make decent profits, it's still in a developing stage, and I honestly cant wait for the completed EA. All this EA lack is a filter that reduces trades when market is becoming to volatile.

Why don't you share your trading system, as surely an experience trader like you must know the holy grail of forex trading, that's how it comes a cross.
Ducdaovn, keep doing what you doing, don't let anyone distract you of completing this EA, just one question is there no new updated version of this EA?
  • #193
  • Jul 14, 2016 4:25am Jul 14, 2016 4:25am
Quoting Waterkloof
Tradability, if you are such an experienced trader, why are you even part of this forum, I think as traders we need to support each other, yes I agree this EA has the potential to blow your account very fast, but also have the potential to make decent profits, it's still in a developing stage, and I honestly cant wait for the completed EA. All this EA lack is a filter that reduces trades when market is becoming to volatile. Why don't you share your trading system, as surely an experience trader like you must know the holy grail of forex trading,...
I don't mean to be offensive but,

Why don't you open up an account with a LARGE sum and use this system to trade it, otherwise shut up, sit and enjoy everyone blowing their accounts.
I don't like liars where he said he wasn't using martingale and clearly by his own graph he is. Then someone like you where I have seen that over decades comes and eggs them on only to see the same rubbish blow account after account.
The thing is you're coming across now as a stupid trader knowing this will blow the account but still wanting to gamble. To make money is to not think like a gambler, think like a businessman.

Simply and no offence , a loser will always be a loser and only they can change that so no mater what experience I share with you/him or whomever, no matter what knowledge I try to pass on which I tried to but it seems you're too stupid to understand and accept it lol, only you can make a difference I have no effect on your/their behaviour.

So many traders know of the 2% of the successful traders and want to be like them but chose not to do what it takes.
  • #194
  • Jul 14, 2016 4:39am Jul 14, 2016 4:39am
Quoting tradability
{quote} I don't mean to be offensive but, Why don't you open up an account with a LARGE sum and use this system to trade it, otherwise shut up, sit and enjoy everyone blowing their accounts. I don't like liars where he said he wasn't using martingale and clearly by his own graph he is. Then someone like you where I have seen that over decades comes and eggs them on only to see the same rubbish blow account after account. The thing is you're coming across now as a stupid trader knowing this will blow the account but still wanting to gamble. To make...
You ARE already in 2%, BUT WE ARE NOT!

I dont believe you are in 2% when you are born...that's why we are here.

Lots increase is risky and we already knew that...

If you really want to help us, pls. give some constructive ideas.
No one wants to be defeated~
  • #195
  • Jul 14, 2016 5:20am Jul 14, 2016 5:20am
Quoting jonirrenicus
{quote} You ARE already in 2%, BUT WE ARE NOT! I dont believe you are in 2% when you are born...that's why we are here. Lots increase is risky and we already knew that... If you really want to help us, pls. give some constructive ideas.
Your issue is you don't like the truth and want to live out in dreams. The incrementing of lot size will blow it up eventually, no matter what you say and do this will happen. To survive a major move one will need to have it linear lot operation.
I have said enough but so many reading this are so stupid and no wonder you complain about the 2% because you are responsible for putting yourself in that position. Overcome your stupidity and come to the other side so I can buy you a drink lol.

There is another forum section that has potential to be a winner with some adjustments. Who wants to follow me there send me a message. I wasted enough time here and I have better things to do then waste my time here like starring at the wall lol bye
  • #196
  • Jul 14, 2016 5:26am Jul 14, 2016 5:26am
Anyone know how to unsubscribe from this section?
  • #197
  • Jul 14, 2016 9:12pm Jul 14, 2016 9:12pm
Quoting tradability
Anyone know how to unsubscribe from this section?

iNTERESTING QUESTIONS
  • #198
  • Jul 17, 2016 7:36am Jul 17, 2016 7:36am
drawdown is too big.
  • #199
  • Jul 20, 2016 9:15am Jul 20, 2016 9:15am
Hi people, as I said I'm testing on demo account with major pairs and metals with grid size 3.
I don't know if it will survive but it's funny to watch take a look http://www.myfxbook.com/members/feli...232455/1693992
  • #200
  • Jul 20, 2016 9:49am Jul 20, 2016 9:49am
Quoting felipebr
Hi people, as I said I'm testing on demo account with major pairs and metals with grid size 3. I don't know if it will survive but it's funny to watch take a look http://www.myfxbook.com/members/feli...232455/1693992
You done a good job

BTW, I suggest to test with account deposit minimum 10.000 USD.

WHY? - In backtest, we saw EA can get highest DD around 5000-7000, and to keep account alive/survive with market, balance must big enough to cover max DD. Ofcouse this is DEMO only, why you have to start with acc balance=1000 only .

Idea for EA? Why we still here, at this thread? - For sure, run this EA can cause big DD. BUT as you see, EA can run with multi pairs. The idea here, is when any pair goes in high DD, account balance still grow up from another pairs. And when EA done from survive, you can take an coffee, smile and enjoy your life...

Is there any way to improve EA? - Sure, I have. I think you know about CSM (Currency strength metter, ask google if you don't know). The current version is for backtest, run with single pair only, ofcouse it can not carry CSM. In final version - multi pairs version, CSM will be included.
For an example: with current version, EA will place BUY order EURUSD when it see a buy signal from EURUSD. But with final version (CSM included), EA will place BUY EURUSD only when it see EUR strengthening or USD weakening (AUDUSD+EURUSD+GBPUSD go up, and USDCAD+USDCHF+USDJPY go down).

Once again, thanks felipebr.
Let's see how she doing.
0 traders viewing now