
- | Membership Revoked | Joined Nov 2010 | 3,324 Posts
Once You See, You Can't Unsee But You Will Get The Odd Poke In The Eye
Trading Made Simple 138,777 replies
MTF Indicators for the 'Trading Made Simple' system 241 replies
Trading Made Simple the right way, and other trading lessons 323 replies
Indicators for the 'Trading Made Simple' system 342 replies
DislikedI've done some research lately regarding ohlc ratio's. I wouldn't call them statistics because I'm not qualified. Anyway, I've found that on average and all "timeframes" the ratio of an average candle is 2 wicks, both of around 25%, so the body being near 50%. One of the thoughts that I have was to wait for price to move 25% of the range in one direction, wait till price reverses and then trade the open. Problem is that it's on average and the average human being has 1 tit and 1 ball.Ignored
DislikedI went to the chart and was just going to say wrt anus' observation. If a candle moves 25% one way then crosses back over, it is most likely not going back. And if it reaches a certain limit such as 300 pips from open to high or low it will retrace 25% from that high or low to the close.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Definitely on the right track. From your data how you see it you also can see that if price has travelled more than 25pct of the average range away from the open and you're looking to trade from the extreme that it's probably gone too far for it to cross back across the open and go the other way. That's not to say it can't go significantly in that direction, just that it's unlikely to go that far this week. Use that data but don't just think in terms of the bar looked at from the outside. Before a wick can be created a body must be. Also...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Finally you are spilling it out, what took you so long bro. Please continue.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I will say this. It is important that we think for ourselves and make our own discoveries as this will give us confidence to trade. Keep on asking yourself, how you can find answers to important questions about price movement. Here is my kind of thinking when looking at OHLC data. Say if I was to just go long on candle open (not suggesting you trade like this). At what point would I know that I am probably trading in the wrong direction of the candle/market and get out? Is it possible to learn this from OHLC data? Short side and long side...Ignored
Dislikedwhy the weekly? 1. For me price has to have enough potential range (price requires time to move) for costs to tend towards zero. I.e the cost of spreads and commissions becomes insignificant in comparison to the ranges we're trading. 2. The weekly is the real market open and close. Brokers even use different times for the daily, never mind h4. Yes brokers can't agree on the Sunday bar but in terms of the range the difference becomes less significant. 3. By using the weekly you're automatically limiting the amount you trade, which is a GOOD THING....Ignored
Disliked{quote} Yes, iTarding can be frustrating sometimes.... Have to say I am finding this thread and other stuff you have posted extremely interesting and thought provoking. Thanks for taking the time to share, much appreciated. Always like people who challenge the accepted "norms", whatever the subject area. But to understand things in any discipline you need a certain level or threshold in accumulated/accrued knowledge, let alone to have the confidence to question things and tackle them head on. You have obviously gone through a long journey to get...Ignored
DislikedHi Nunrguy, the catchy thread title caught my eye, anything with added BS has to be worth a look. Haven't read entire thread but get the gist of what you driving at. The references to OHLC sparked interest. Maybe there is nothing more required other than OHLC ? When all is said and done the only records we have of the market are time stamped OHLC from Yearly to 1min. The further down the timescale, the lower they become in the pecking order. What if a Monthly High from 1999 or a weekly open from January for example could be recycled and repeatedly...Ignored