Alpari.co.uk Discussion | Page 239 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Alpari UK Insolvency Does Not Affect Other Alpari Companies 4 replies

Alpari US vs Alpari UK 20 replies

Alpari NZ vs Alpari UK 7 replies

Alpari Direct Pro vs Alpari MT4 Pro 4 replies

Alpari Russia, Alpari UK or MIG??? 5 replies

Attachments: Alpari.co.uk Discussion
Exit Attachments

Alpari.co.uk Discussion

  • #4,761
  • Mar 1, 2015 9:16am Mar 1, 2015 9:16am
Quoting jizzyjay
{quote} What makes you say that? I am a client but i see things for what they are not what I want them to be. Everyone is free to do as they wish. Im just trying to add some logical thinking to this thread. If at any time I think something is not going as it should be I will question it. I actually have done. The only reason I have not shared any of my questions and findings on this thread is because last time I did so I was told not to contribute anything negative, even if it was fact. People only want to hear what they want to hear, they are not...
Honestly I don't want to choose FSCS because that means I will whatever loss no less than $10,000 which I think it is not fair. It is a hard decision for me but I appreciate any advice. So thank you nevertheless.
  • #4,762
  • Mar 1, 2015 9:33am Mar 1, 2015 9:33am
At alpari KPMG online portal, should i choose FSCS question YES or No?


hello, my Name is Jenny from switzerland.
Right now, today, i like to claim at my online Portal at kpmg alpari insolvency page.


Should i choose FSCS question YES or No?


Can i return to claim with alpari KPMG, after i said Yes to FSCS Claim procedure?


Does anybody personally has the same Problem and how did you solve it?


best regards
Jenny
  • #4,763
  • Mar 1, 2015 9:35am Mar 1, 2015 9:35am
Quoting magicpips
the problem with FSCS is ,claims take about 6 months to finish
This estimate is based on what? It's too long I'd say...
  • #4,764
  • Mar 1, 2015 9:42am Mar 1, 2015 9:42am
Quoting Tim_isoara
{quote} We have a proporsal from KPMG, in english, and is very clear. You have too much time, I don't have. But I give you a free advice, focus on KPMG, don't think the FSCS. Later you will have the answer.

i am focusing to what i read and even my "legal experienced" friends think that this is part is not clear (besides me)

i have good time mgt not much time thats the difference

and i am focusing on both as i would eventually need to make a decision sometime


if you know everything then shoot and tell (with facts) otherwise just keep underestimating others
  • #4,765
  • Mar 1, 2015 9:50am Mar 1, 2015 9:50am
It would be great if someone would investigate and give advice which choice to make when it will be the time. KPMG seems to be aiming for profit, while FSCS should in theory protect us.

I was short EURGBP when the crash happened and the position closed by them was in the green. I didn't get any invite for the portal yet, as expected since I had open positions. Let's see how they will handle the whole thing or if they will find an excuse to cut the balance.
  • #4,766
  • Edited 1:01pm Mar 1, 2015 10:11am | Edited 1:01pm
Quoting KGP
{quote} i am focusing to what i read and even my "legal experienced" friends think that this is part is not clear (besides me) i have good time mgt not much time thats the difference and i am focusing on both as i would eventually need to make a decision sometime if you know everything then shoot and tell (with facts) otherwise just keep underestimating others
Dear KGP
Your friends have not a good legal experience.
So the last free advice.
You/We dont have a valid claim for FSCS.

Read this is from FSCS:http://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover...t_help_me_Why_

"The firm I dealt with is no longer trading, but the FSCS says it cannot help me. Why?
As a fund of last resort, we can only consider claims if they cannot be paid by anyone else. If the firm is no longer trading but still has assets that could meet your claim, we are unlikely to be able to help you. This means that you will need to take your case up with the firm you dealt with."

You/We must claim through KPMG.
I hope now everything is clear.
And if you don't want to pay fee to KPMG you must vote, for that thing.
  • #4,767
  • Mar 1, 2015 11:06am Mar 1, 2015 11:06am
Quoting mmx007
{quote} Honestly I don't want to choose FSCS because that means I will whatever loss no less than $10,000 which I think it is not fair. It is a hard decision for me but I appreciate any advice. So thank you nevertheless.
Thats fair enough.
What I will say is dont take advice from just anyone because its not always correct.
The right answers to the questions you need answering are a phonecall or email away.
The people dealing with this process are the ones to ask. They cannot afford to give out misinformation as the consequences of that happening would be huge.
Find out the facts yourself that way you know your getting the right advice.
The truth is out there. You just need to ask the right people the right questions.
Hope it all works out for you.
  • #4,768
  • Mar 1, 2015 11:47am Mar 1, 2015 11:47am
Please I'm doing research on trustworthy brokers that is similar to Alpari UK and I came up with FxPro UK, Activ Trades and Vantage Fx UK. Can someone please send me a link to where I can get full details of each account they offer such as leverage and minimum deposit required e.t.c? Also please, I need a review from any one that has trading experience with these brokers. Thank you.
  • #4,769
  • Mar 1, 2015 12:32pm Mar 1, 2015 12:32pm
Quoting Tim_isoara
{quote}Your friends have not a good legal experience.
you are making "easy" assumptions as it seems is the case with many of your posts


Quoting Tim_isoara
{quote}So the last free advice. You/We dont have a valid claim for FSCS.
i havent said that i/we do... so you are trying to paraphrase everything i have already said? dont do that


Quoting Tim_isoara
{quote} And if you don't want to pay fee to KPMG you must vote, for that thing.
thats the mistake you are making...and you have done many times before when you are saying things are clear (for the subject we are arguing for)....

if i/you/we dont want to pay KPMG fees then i/you/we need not only to vote for this but the majority to do as such as well....and so in return the result to be in favor of what i/you/we voted for.


i am still waiting to give me proof of where it is 100% clear (stating HOW the funds are going to be repaid not how they are going to hold/treat/control it) that the funds are going to be paid the way you say (regarding KPMG).... because i made that mistake and i corrected it immediately later (on another post) when i re-read the document (and i understood why my friends didnt agree each other opinion wise)


last but not least
Quoting Tim_isoara
{quote}You/We must claim from KPMG. I hope now everything is clear.
our claim is from alpari not KPMG its a great difference between the two of them....KPMG is having a role in the process of it and is not alpari if you want to be clear as you claim you should have said that...


Ps i dont understand what we are actually arguing for ... when we are clearly on the same side
  • #4,770
  • Mar 1, 2015 12:36pm Mar 1, 2015 12:36pm
jizzyjay,

You're doing a nice job helping the least informed people here, and until now I agree with all your point of views.

I have access to the portal since late friday, but only accessed it now - the amounts are correct, as expected.
Haven't agreed to anything for now, just entered to consult the balance.
I will be waiting for some feedbacks more, about the submission to either KPMG or FSCS, namely yours, after your confirmation call next week.
  • #4,771
  • Mar 1, 2015 12:41pm Mar 1, 2015 12:41pm
Quoting tonirai
jizzyjay, You're doing a nice job helping the least informed people here, and until now I agree with all your point of views. I have access to the portal since late friday, but only accessed it now - the amounts are correct, as expected. Haven't agreed to anything for now, just entered to consult the balance. I will be waiting for some feedbacks more, about the submission to either KPMG or FSCS, namely yours, after your confirmation call next week.
No problem tonirai.
Check your PM's.
  • #4,772
  • Mar 1, 2015 12:57pm Mar 1, 2015 12:57pm
Quoting KGP
{quote} you are making "easy" assumptions as it seems is the case with many of your posts {quote} i havent said that i/we do... so you are trying to paraphrase everything i have already said? dont do that {quote} thats the mistake you are making...and you have done many times before when you are saying things are clear (for the subject we are arguing for).... if i/you/we dont want to pay KPMG fees then i/you/we need not only to vote for this but the majority to do as such as well....and so in return the result to be in favor of what i/you/we voted...
After reading, I'm sorry for you.
A simple thank, from you, would be nice.
  • #4,773
  • Mar 1, 2015 1:05pm Mar 1, 2015 1:05pm
Quoting jizzyjay
{quote} Thats fair enough. What I will say is dont take advice from just anyone because its not always correct. The right answers to the questions you need answering are a phonecall or email away. The people dealing with this process are the ones to ask. They cannot afford to give out misinformation as the consequences of that happening would be huge. Find out the facts yourself that way you know your getting the right advice. The truth is out there. You just need to ask the right people the right questions. Hope it all works out for you.
For your information.

Read this is from FSCS:http://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover...t_help_me_Why_

"The firm I dealt with is no longer trading, but the FSCS says it cannot help me. Why?
As a fund of last resort, we can only consider claims if they cannot be paid by anyone else. If the firm is no longer trading but still has assets that could meet your claim, we are unlikely to be able to help you. This means that you will need to take your case up with the firm you dealt with."

We must claim through KPMG.
  • #4,774
  • Mar 1, 2015 1:13pm Mar 1, 2015 1:13pm
So why in the portal is possible to claim with either?? KPMG and FSCS???
myfxbook: neoxis
  • #4,775
  • Edited 1:33pm Mar 1, 2015 1:21pm | Edited 1:33pm
Quoting Tim_isoara
{quote} For your information. Read this is from FSCS:http://www.fscs.org.uk/what-we-cover...t_help_me_Why_ "The firm I dealt with is no longer trading, but the FSCS says it cannot help me. Why? As a fund of last resort, we can only consider claims if they cannot be paid by anyone else. If the firm is no longer trading but still has assets that could meet your claim, we are unlikely to be able to help you. This means that you will need to take your...
I know what the website says but everything written is open to interpretation. Also it may not apply to our situation.

If the firm is no longer trading but still has assets that could meet your claim, we are unlikely to be able to help you.

The part I highlighted is the reason why a phonecall is needed to clarify that statement. The use of the word unlikely leaves the statement open ended and that has been purposely done simply because it may not be true for all cases. Unlikely is not a definite.
I phoned the FSCS and asked them about the situation.
They confirmed they knew about everything that KPMG had written in the emails to the first batch of clients.
Everything else I was told I have written in my previous posts.
The information I received over the phone is current and correct.
I will phone again this week for clarification as advised.
  • #4,776
  • Mar 1, 2015 1:32pm Mar 1, 2015 1:32pm
Quoting jizzyjay
{quote} I know what the website says but everything written is open to interpretation. Also it may not apply to our situation. If the firm is no longer trading but still has assets that could meet your claim, we are unlikely to be able to help you. The part I highlighted is the reason why a phonecall is needed to clarify that statement. The use of the word unlikely leaves the statement open ended and that is done simply because it may not be true for all cases. Unlikely is not a definite. I phoned the FSCS and asked them about the situation. They...
I wait your phone call to FSCS.
  • #4,777
  • Mar 1, 2015 1:37pm Mar 1, 2015 1:37pm
Quoting Tim_isoara
{quote} I wait your phone call to FSCS.
Im not posting my findings anymore.
The people who are interested in what I find have PM'd me.
  • #4,778
  • Mar 1, 2015 1:40pm Mar 1, 2015 1:40pm
Quoting jizzyjay
{quote} Im not posting my findings anymore. The people who are interested in what I find have PM'd me.
Better for all. Good luck at trading.
  • #4,779
  • Mar 1, 2015 1:47pm Mar 1, 2015 1:47pm
What is better? FSCS guarantee all the money, but KMGP not all the money?

What option takes less time?

For accounts with only $ 1000 that you recommend?
  • #4,780
  • Mar 1, 2015 2:05pm Mar 1, 2015 2:05pm
Quoting jizzyjay
{quote} Im not posting my findings anymore. The people who are interested in what I find have PM'd me.
Please post your findings again. Thanks
2 traders viewing now