Elliott wave outlook | Page 472 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Elliott Wave Counting with EG 2,835 replies

EUR/USD and other - Elliott Wave Analysis 21 replies

The Basics of Elliott Wave Theory 128 replies

Elliott Wave Gbp/usd 4 replies

(Euro) Elliott Wave Formations 43 replies

Attachments: Elliott wave outlook
Exit Attachments

Elliott wave outlook

Sep 11, 2014
Last Sync: Sep 11, 2014
Sep 11, 2014
Last Sync: Sep 11, 2014
Sep 11, 2014
Last Sync: Sep 11, 2014
Sep 11, 2014
Last Sync: Sep 11, 2014
to
No trading activity in this period.
  • #9,421
  • Jan 7, 2014 12:34am Jan 7, 2014 12:34am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} do you realy think people will start reviewing threads, if you have already published a chart there? What is so difficult to post it again or give the link?

  • #9,422
  • Jan 7, 2014 2:42am Jan 7, 2014 2:42am
Quoting jaylovin
{quote} my thoughts exactly without EW in mind

my charts, the above chart do not trust the labeling.
http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...91#post7193991
the premature hypotesis is there too.
http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...54#post7194354

have comments?
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #9,423
  • Jan 7, 2014 6:18am Jan 7, 2014 6:18am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} my charts, the above chart do not trust the labeling. http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...91#post7193991 the premature hypotesis is there too. http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...54#post7194354 have comments?

Hi Ud1nh0,

Nice charts mate.

We were discussing the Major Picture going back before even 2006.

In that context Your charts are not particularly useful for this part of the discussion.

My understanding is that Longer Term Counts is what Markus (Infinitus) was requesting so that it is in context with what we are working towards which is what happens from here for the longer term. We have a two Ideas and with a Very Significant High as one option and a Very Significant Low as the other.

Do You see now ?

Regards,

FM

.
  • #9,424
  • Jan 7, 2014 6:41am Jan 7, 2014 6:41am
Quoting Forex Magic
{quote} Hi Ud1nh0, Nice charts mate. We were discussing the Major Picture going back before even 2006. In that context Your charts are not particularly useful for this part of the discussion. My understanding is that Longer Term Counts is what Markus (Infinitus) was requesting so that it is in context with what we are working towards which is what happens from here for the longer term. We have a two Ideas and with a Very Significant High as one option and a Very Significant Low as the other. Do You see now ? Regards, FM .
i see but no 0.96
this chart was randomly labelling for coz its complex. especially downward 3710 till 27xx. i can't dechiper it as a c wave.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eurusd-w1-oanda-corporation.png Size: 50 KB
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #9,425
  • Jan 7, 2014 7:52am Jan 7, 2014 7:52am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} i see but no 0.96 this chart was randomly labelling for coz its complex. especially downward 3710 till 27xx. i can't dechiper it as a c wave. {image}

the labeling, in my view does not make sense in any EW technique (traditional, Neowave, HEW)

can someone understand actually what you are thinking?

If you label a chart in an EW thread, and you do not use EW rules and guidelines at all, tell the people, that you are trying to invent a new wave-technique before everybody gets mad about you

no disrespect or attack at all, only advise
  • #9,426
  • Jan 7, 2014 8:14am Jan 7, 2014 8:14am
Quoting infinitus
{quote} the labeling, in my view does not make sense in any EW technique (traditional, Neowave, HEW) can someone understand actually what you are thinking? If you label a chart in an EW thread, and you do not use EW rules and guidelines at all, tell the people, that you are trying to invent a new wave-technique before everybody gets mad about you no disrespect or attack at all, only advise

first problem, downward from 1.4750 till 1.2050 is impulsive...its a c wave.
2nd problem, upward move from 1.2050 till 1.317x is impulsive then a corrective that break previous small 4.
third problem, c wave white should be impulsive..
i follow rule c wave always looks very impulsive..
thus everytime i look at very stroong impulsive at its near end i counter trade

i believe in God and c wave impulsive...all else is secondary hahahhahah
do u see impulsive move upward? no...then its not c wave upward.....
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: eurusd-d1-oanda-corporation.png Size: 44 KB
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #9,427
  • Jan 7, 2014 8:44am Jan 7, 2014 8:44am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} first problem, downward from 1.4750 till 1.2050 is impulsive...its a c wave. 2nd problem, upward move from 1.2050 till 1.317x is impulsive then a corrective that break previous small 4. third problem, c wave white should be impulsive.. i follow rule c wave always looks very impulsive.. thus everytime i look at very stroong impulsive at its near end i counter trade i believe in God and c wave impulsive...all else is secondary hahahhahah do u see impulsive move upward? no...then its not c wave upward..... {image}

checking guideline if the A wave can/ able move further than the previous impulse wave corrected....
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #9,428
  • Jan 7, 2014 9:29am Jan 7, 2014 9:29am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} checking guideline if the A wave can/ able move further than the previous impulse wave corrected....


Hi ud1nh0,


Try this:

Offer Your charts as a "Suggestion" and try and keep an Open Mind.

God Loves an open mind.... gives him room to speak to us about important things

How do You propose trading Your assumption ?

Now that would be useful for any Trader and YOU !

I have been involved with EWT for some years and am quite proficient and yet I tell You this.... when we KNOW what is happening SO WELL we miss what else may be happening and can really get our fingers burned.

In that sense Alternative Counts are recommended for that means we can monitor which one is coming true !!!

Meanwhile, if You act as I suggest, You wont attract strong opinions which will make life easier for all of us.

Being RIGID is a BIG MISTAKE in Forex and especially EWT.

Just a light-hearted hint my friend.

Best Wishes,

David (FM)

.
  • #9,429
  • Jan 7, 2014 9:57am Jan 7, 2014 9:57am
Quoting Forex Magic
{quote} Hi ud1nh0, Try this: Offer Your charts as a "Suggestion" and try and keep an Open Mind. God Loves an open mind.... gives him room to speak to us about important things How do You propose trading Your assumption ? Now that would be useful for any Trader and YOU ! I have been involved with EWT for some years and am quite proficient and yet I tell You this.... when we KNOW what is happening SO WELL we miss what else may be happening and can really get our fingers burned. In that sense Alternative Counts are recommended for that means we...

yes David,
im waiting tp 1.4197. did u waiting 1.28?
im trying to play 5-3-5,3-3-5 and only 5 as one segment combination. its not exist on the books, coz there are rules of combination.
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #9,430
  • Jan 7, 2014 10:01am Jan 7, 2014 10:01am
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} yes David, im waiting tp 1.4197. did u waiting 1.28? im trying to play 5-3-5,3-3-5 and only 5 as one segment combination. its not exist on the books, coz there are rules of combination.


You can see my different views here:

http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...75#post7190975


I havnt updated them for a while and wait and see
  • #9,431
  • Jan 7, 2014 9:16pm Jan 7, 2014 9:16pm
Quoting Forex Magic
{quote} You can see my different views here: http://www.forexfactory.com/showthre...75#post7190975 I havnt updated them for a while and wait and see

we will A downward
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #9,432
  • Jan 7, 2014 9:48pm Jan 7, 2014 9:48pm
Quoting ud1nh0
{quote} we will A downward



1.16?1.24?1.28?1.20 ?
1.60?1.51?1.42?
multiple choice options
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #9,433
  • Jan 8, 2014 6:57pm Jan 8, 2014 6:57pm
If $GBPAUD holds 1.8500, completes this H&S and makes a run on the 1.8225 neckline,
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: original_18808527.jpg Size: 47 KB
  • #9,434
  • Jan 9, 2014 8:27pm Jan 9, 2014 8:27pm
How am I doing with my labeling? This Elliott Wave thing is a lot harder than it looks!
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot3.png Size: 147 KB
  • #9,435
  • Jan 10, 2014 4:08pm Jan 10, 2014 4:08pm
Quoting sojourner
How am I doing with my labeling? This Elliott Wave thing is a lot harder than it looks!{image}
Fine. Wave 4 could diff.
Stocktwit: LuisCarlos - twitter: @lcparodi
  • #9,436
  • Jan 10, 2014 8:20pm Jan 10, 2014 8:20pm
let see if the EURAUD follows the path
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: EURAUD1.png Size: 95 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: EURAUD2.png Size: 36 KB
Stocktwit: LuisCarlos - twitter: @lcparodi
  • #9,437
  • Jan 11, 2014 1:52pm Jan 11, 2014 1:52pm
Quote
Fine. Wave 4 could diff.

Luis,

Thanks for the info. Wave 4 does seem to be a bit long and drawn out.
Counting waves is not easy with all the rules and guidelines to follow.


Kevin
  • #9,438
  • Jan 11, 2014 7:21pm Jan 11, 2014 7:21pm
Quoting sojourner
{quote} Luis, Thanks for the info. Wave 4 does seem to be a bit long and drawn out. Counting waves is not easy with all the rules and guidelines to follow. Kevin
Running flat
Stocktwit: LuisCarlos - twitter: @lcparodi
  • #9,439
  • Jan 11, 2014 7:40pm Jan 11, 2014 7:40pm
Quoting Schickeria
{quote}

watch the former 4 and the former 2 of the previously completed motive CEW Elliott.
what's the difference with zigzag?
14QDuJtV7okxhBzC86FwawaR6tV5LvetLq
  • #9,440
  • Jan 11, 2014 9:42pm Jan 11, 2014 9:42pm
Quoting sojourner
{quote} Luis, Thanks for the info. Wave 4 does seem to be a bit long and drawn out. Counting waves is not easy with all the rules and guidelines to follow. Kevin
as this:
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Captura de pantalla 2014-01-12 00.40.37.png Size: 89 KB
Stocktwit: LuisCarlos - twitter: @lcparodi
2 traders viewing now