Sonic R. System | Page 2798 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Sonic R.evolution 95 replies

The System Behind the System, by Merlin Jeffries 16 replies

Old School Sonic System + Other Things 11 replies

Knife system, Vegas 4h system related questions. 4 replies

Would you trade this system? New system #2. 10 replies

Attachments: Sonic R. System
Exit Attachments

Sonic R. System

  • #55,941
  • Aug 10, 2013 5:52am Aug 10, 2013 5:52am
Quoting JRissa
{quote} The answer is; Virtual money. Period. Professor TAH posted about this months ago; Term MM = market maker/manipulator with endless pockets. Big bank creates virtual credit to one's account -> by using there virtual credits, one can make orders -> there is no limit or regulation in this virtual credit amount, so -> one has enough power behind to reverse PA direction when wanted. After there is enough profit -> virtual money is marked as payd back and nobody knows it ever existed. So basically, MM's can newer lose. They can allways average...
Thanks JRissa,

In addition, the ONLY way for MMs to make money is building positions. I'll let you guys think about that one!
insanity: Doing the same thing over... and expecting different results -AE
  • #55,942
  • Aug 10, 2013 5:55am Aug 10, 2013 5:55am
Quoting JRissa
{quote} The answer is; Virtual money. Period. Professor TAH posted about this months ago; Term MM = market maker/manipulator with endless pockets. Big bank creates virtual credit to one's account -> by using there virtual credits, one can make orders -> there is no limit or regulation in this virtual credit amount, so -> one has enough power behind to reverse PA direction when wanted. After there is enough profit -> virtual money is marked as payd back and nobody knows it ever existed. So basically, MM's can newer lose. They can allways average...
Interesting.
I am open to the idea. Can you point me to some external sources relating to this Virtual Money and its mechanics ?
Thanks.
  • #55,943
  • Aug 10, 2013 6:05am Aug 10, 2013 6:05am
Quoting Mingary
{quote} Interesting. I am open to the idea. Can you point me to some external sources relating to this Virtual Money and its mechanics ? Thanks.
Well like I said; this is something that Professor TAH posted and I might guess this is hyphotetical, but highly possibly the case as it is. I would guess that if and when this is the case; MM's, banks and everyone involved should keep this as well hidden as it ever could be. Otherwice; imagine the scandal it would bring to markets if it would be revealed.

Fact is, that banks have accounts to all us normal people with "virtual" money; bank doesn't really have this money, it's only money on computers. Think about scandals that have been with banks; people had credit shown on their account, but when they tried to take it out or use it, bank didn't have money. Even banks go to bankrupt they have, but really don't have the money that it's being said on paper
I know the secret...
  • #55,944
  • Edited 6:38am Aug 10, 2013 6:21am | Edited 6:38am
Quoting JRissa
{quote} Well like I said; this is something that Professor TAH posted and I might guess this is hyphotetical, but highly possibly the case as it is. I would guess that if and when this is the case; MM's, banks and everyone involved should keep this as well hidden as it ever could be. Otherwice; imagine the scandal it would bring to markets if it would be revealed. Fact is, that banks have accounts to all us normal people with "virtual" money; bank doesn't really have this money, it's only money on computers. Think about scandals that have been...
ok then... I worked at Deutsche Bank in their Global Custody area - trade settlement. I can assure you that the internal and external audit is extremely rigorous.
Therefore this "virtual money" idea must be something that is already accepted and common practice, therefore it should be documented somewhere.
For example, banks are authorized to use "virtual money" from the FED. For every dollar borrowed from the FED banks may lend 10 dollars to you and me, this means that yes, the money in your account is indeed virtual money. This is a known fact and certainly not a secret and perhaps this is what you are actually referring to?

I am sure you will agree it would be very revealing to get some actual sources and documented facts concerning "the unlimited funds" that are available to the MMs (banks and other scoundrels) for trading. I cannot find anything, even in the "conspiracy" world in my google search (:

Perhaps Mr. TAH can shed some light on the matter.
  • #55,945
  • Aug 10, 2013 6:26am Aug 10, 2013 6:26am
Quoting JRissa
{quote} Well like I said; this is something that Professor TAH posted and I might guess this is hyphotetical, but highly possibly the case as it is. I would guess that if and when this is the case; MM's, banks and everyone involved should keep this as well hidden as it ever could be. Otherwice; imagine the scandal it would bring to markets if it would be revealed. Fact is, that banks have accounts to all us normal people with "virtual" money; bank doesn't really have this money, it's only money on computers. Think about scandals that have been...
I agree completely with you JRissa, but the current method has a problem and if we don't accept that, we are stupid. Most of us start to build position too soon, and that is translated in a worse avg price and more DD. I think that if we want to keep improving this, the primary target should be a better way to detect when should we start to build position.

We must improve this for a lot of reasons: DDs, psychology, better avg price, suffering, etc. 300-400 pips from our first order IS A MISTAKE. And our ego shouldn't stop us to admit that. This is not average down like Joe say because we divide our entries (called seeds as well), but if we want to be successful building position, we must find a better way to detect the point where we should start to build.
To fail is just an opportunity to learn
  • #55,946
  • Aug 10, 2013 6:33am Aug 10, 2013 6:33am
Quoting Tymedu
{quote} we must find a better way to detect the point where we should start to build.....
Yes. now you are onto something good... not all "MM position building" are created equal.
  • #55,947
  • Aug 10, 2013 7:12am Aug 10, 2013 7:12am
It is time to listen..


Inserted Video



Inserted Video


Sonic
  • #55,948
  • Aug 10, 2013 7:17am Aug 10, 2013 7:17am
Quoting traderathome
{quote} UChf Long Trade: Entered longs #1 - #2, Scouts. I have another UChf long trade on another account. This is a separate trade. The basis for this trade is the price is at lows again (look at an H1 chart), and now as a Double Bottom on M15. And PVSRA indicates the MMs are bulls by now pushing the price below the half SR on notable activity, when the price is already at significant lows. {image}
UChf Long Trade: Closed all 7 trade components for 21 pips gain. I added #3 - #7 since the first posting. I decided to close at the end of the week to increase available bank pips for use next week for hunting maybe better game, and because I already have an older trade running on this pair.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: aug 2013 - 062.png Size: 81 KB
  • #55,949
  • Aug 10, 2013 7:28am Aug 10, 2013 7:28am
PVSRA Results for 1st Nineteen Weeks

The following are the results of my trading the Sonic R. System using PVSRA to determine if it is a bull or bear market, and then trading the price action I see.

Week ending 04/05
1289 pips gained, 7 trades totaling 19 parts (18 parts winners), averaging 67+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 04/12
1891 pips gained, 9 trades totaling 28 parts (all parts winners), averaging 67+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 04/19
2160 pips gained, 9 trades totaling 31 parts (29 parts winners), averaging 69+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 04/26
2640 pips gained, 6 trades totaling 34 parts (all parts winners), averaging 77+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 05/03
2530 pips gained, 6 trades totaling 24 parts (23 parts winners), averaging 105+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 05/10
3050 pips gained, 7 trades totaling 33 parts (all parts winners), averaging 92+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 05/17
1590 pips gained, 7 trades totaling 16 parts (all parts winners), averaging 99+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 05/24
3980 pips gained, 7 trades totaling 40 parts (33 parts winners), averaging 99+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 05/31
4003 pips gained, 5 trades totaling 37 parts (34 parts winners), averaging 108+ pips per each of all parts.

Week ending 06/07
9813 pips gained, 9 trades totaling 61 parts (53 parts winners), averaging 160+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 06/14
3900 pips gained, 2 trades totaling 15 parts (all parts winners), averaging 260+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 06/21
4620 pips gained, 3 trades totaling 33 parts (all parts winners), averaging 140+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 06/28
12,120 pips gained, 8 trades totaling 86 parts (82 parts winners), averaging 140+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 07/05
3,440 pips gained, 2 trades totaling 22 parts (18 parts winners), averaging 156+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 07/12
14,143 pips gained, 11 trades totaling 125 parts (115 parts winners), averaging 113+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 07/19
215 pips gained, 2 trades totaling 7 parts (all parts winners), averaging 30+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 07/26
1,170 pips gained, 2 trades totaling 25 parts (16 parts winners), averaging 46+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 08/02
10,850 pips gained, 8 trades totaling 102 parts (87 parts winners), averaging 106+ pips per each of all parts

Week ending 08/09
7,784 pips gained, 4 trades totaling 72 parts (50 parts winners), averaging 108+ pips per each of all parts

All of these trades, all of the trade parts thereof, were posted real-time right here on the Sonic R. System thread, using crystal clear easy to understand charts and explanations regarding PVSRA reasons for entries, whether Classic or Scout trades.

Nineteen Week Summary

91,188 pips banked.
17,794 pips current draw down (net loss of all open PVSRA trades).
73,397 pips net gain (pips banked plus net loss of all open PVSRA trades).
3,862 pips weekly average net profit (weekly average net profit if all open PVSRA trades instantly closed).

Additional Remarks

I have one open non-PVSRA trade (first entered many months prior to PVSRA) that is down 10,182 pips (EJ short). For this trade to come into profit either the euro needs to weaken or the YEN needs to strengthen, or both. And both are more likely to happen than not. So, it is just a question of time. In any case, if I instantly closed this trade against my PVSRA net gains, I would still have 3,326 pips weekly average net profit over these past nineteen weeks! I doubt there are many traders at ForexFactory that can testify to such success as this, if any at all. I say this not to boast about myself, but about PVSRA. It is an effective real-time market analysis, so effective that it negates the old "truth" advocated by some, that one should never average down. It enables traders to trade the way professional traders do,.......and profit the way they do!

Final Remarks

This has been the fourth week in a row the market continued it's shakeout of weak hands for some pairs. My plan has remained unchanged. I continued adding to some open trades and opened two new trades. I did close more trades than last week, but those that are open are still suffering draw downs. So, this "state of draw down affairs" that intimidates traders and tests the validity of PVSRA is still running it's course.

-tah
  • #55,950
  • Edited 7:58am Aug 10, 2013 7:48am | Edited 7:58am
Quoting Mingary
{quote} Interesting. I am open to the idea. Can you point me to some external sources relating to this Virtual Money and its mechanics ? Thanks.
Fiat Money, the Prize Talisman of the F....king Banks!

Here is a simple overview.

Big banks are the big players in their "practically solely owned corporate casino", the forex market. The market makers are their lackey "employees" that get their orders filled. The games at this casino are rigged. How? The big banks determine price. Nobody else does except the central banks, but they do not often come into the casino to demand prices change. They are essentially "silent partners" in this rigged operation.

The big banks control currencies. Why even in the USA the banks lobbied, and got passed (by the republican lapdogs of the super-rich), a law that removed all restrictions on banks from issuing credit. Issuing credit is akin to printing money! That totally unbacked (by anything but the full faith and credit of the F...king bank) is called fiat money! Now, realize that the biggest trading desks in the forex market are where,......? Yep! At the banks! And the trading operations of these banks need money to trade with, right? Where do you think these trading operations get the credit to trade with? Are you starting to get the picture? And is there any limit on the amount of credit that the banks can come up with to support their trading operations? Fiat money! Counterfeit "money" that is instantly created by computers and used to manipulate and control whatever it is applied to! Fiat money; it is the Prize Talisman of the dirty rotten stinking banks!

Now you know the rest of the story.

When you trade in the forex market, your are trading against some of the biggest, greediest, most evil forces in the world. But do not cower, for we Sonicers have PVSRA and we are crusaders!

-tah
  • #55,951
  • Edited 8:59am Aug 10, 2013 8:25am | Edited 8:59am
Quoting Tymedu
{quote} I agree completely with you JRissa, but the current method has a problem and if we don't accept that, we are stupid. Most of us start to build position too soon, and that is translated in a worse avg price and more DD. I think that if we want to keep improving this, the primary target should be a better way to detect when should we start to build position. We must improve this for a lot of reasons: DDs, psychology, better avg price, suffering, etc. 300-400 pips from our first order IS A MISTAKE. And our ego shouldn't stop us to admit that....
PVSRA: Bulls or Bears? Do We Trade Long or Short?

qFish posted an interesting chart, which I reposted this past week. Essentially, the chart suggested that, for example, as price begins an inter-day swing up, and moves on up to eventually roll over and reverse, that throughout the process the MMs are both building long and short positions. It suggests that the MMs short at the highs and long at the lows of the price cycles within the overall move up. As price moves up towards completion of the move, the MMs focus on closing the longs for profit and opening the best priced shorts. If price ranges before reversing, it just gives the MMs the opportunity to completely close longs at best prices and to add more shorts at best prices, before the next inter-day swing, down.

Many moons ago, I used the analogy that the market is like a playing field, for football or soccer. Teams run the ball one way, then the other. The field is limited in length. so eventually the ball must move back in the other direction. That is inevitable! I also used to talk about how the big players needed to make their daily, weekly, monthly profit targets,....in order to keep them in wine, wimmin' and song! Do you think these two analogies are absurd? They are factual, and it explains why forex prices swing up and down, continuously with relatively few straight out runs that go "forever". Those do happen, but seldomly. And when the occasion for them occurs, the F...king banks jump on the opportunity because it gives them absurd profits taking out weak hands! But, for the most part, and due to political more than financial reasons, the banks control prices up and down within "politically acceptable" limits, the current limited length of the forex playing field.

Get the picture yet? Up and down within "acceptable limits" is the "normal" game at the banks "practically solely owned corporate casino" called the forex market. So yes, they build positions both ways no matter which way they are pushing the price, because it suckers other traders in no matter what their bias is, and this enables the banks to build positions both ways! And, by controlling the "bigger picture" up and down swings, the biggest F...king banks cannot help but make money as they move the ball back and forth, across their playing field!

Is all of this a "simplification"? Certainly. But again, I ask if you believe the "essence" of it? Personally, my way of thinking is this. It might not be a duck, but if it looks like a duck, walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, then I am going to treat it like a duck.

So, which way should we trade? We can trade long when the swing is up. We can trade short when the swing is up. We can trade long when the swing is down. We can trade short when the swing is down. Ever wonder why the NFA lapdogs of the super-rich banks and their lackey market makers lobbied (and got passed due to the Republican lapdogs of the super-rich) laws in the USA preventing retailers from hedging? Now you know! It was not to "protect" retailers, but to keep them from trading the way the "casino owners" trade!

So, which way are you going to trade? That is your decision.

-tah
  • #55,952
  • Aug 10, 2013 9:08am Aug 10, 2013 9:08am
Quoting JRissa
{quote} The way Professor and many other traders here (inclunding me) build positions against trend, with PVSR Analysis, is so called MM's way. If you would understand the only way that MM's can build positions, you would understand why they only build to opposite direction. You see, it's completely different from us "normal" small traders. We can just buy or sell whenever we want and our broker is responsible for filling the order. Another way of saying this is that our broker might not get their money back, but that is not so simple and I won't...
Very clear, thanks you very much JRissa
Newbie trader
  • #55,953
  • Aug 10, 2013 9:47am Aug 10, 2013 9:47am
HOW DID I GET HOW DOES PVSRA WORKS.
let us imagine we have found the trend (1-2-3 or MA's etc) or the trade pattern (pin bar, H&S etc) or retracement from FIBO level or whatever else it doesn't matter what exactly but something what giving us very clear signal (from classical point of view) to buy or to sell.
I suppose most of all traders educated the same way (personally I did test many trading system and most of them showing signals the same time +/-).
Thats why they are doing the same trades the same time.
But look if all traders are selling who is buying? And if everybody buying who will sell them?
The answer is simple - those who make this market. Somebody can buy it from them or sell them what they want.
And what do you thing about reason of it's guys? Do they do the charity? No they doing business! If those guys with very deep pockets bought something to make money they have to sell it by higher price. So, while everybody selling because trend, pattern or other signals (prepared by big guys for sure ) they are buying. And as soon as they are filled they are starting the process to make money. Usually it happens very quick and everybody except them are loosing. As I lossed before. As other from this thread were.
So to be succesful you have to be not as everybody. And PVSRA is the main path to those way. If you are able to understand then my congratulations and you are welcome! If not - well, try one more time or better to leave FOREX.
Everything is possible!!! Step by Step...
  • #55,954
  • Aug 10, 2013 9:52am Aug 10, 2013 9:52am
Quoting traderathome
{quote} PVSRA: Bulls or Bears? Do We Trade Long or Short? qFish posted an interesting chart, which I reposted this past week. Essentially, the chart suggested that, for example, as price begins an inter-day swing up, and moves on up to eventually roll over and reverse, that throughout the process the MMs are both building long and short positions. It suggests that the MMs short at the highs and long at the lows of the price cycles within the overall move up. As price moves up towards completion of the move, the MMs focus on closing the longs for...
Yeah. If we could hedge, we'd be twice as profitable! I hate that we can't hedge.

Using PVSRA, we can take advantage of these moves and adapt it to a trading style we are comfortable with. We all have to experiement and try new things that OBJECTIVELY gives us better positioning and lower DD.

For instance... if we see that we are coming to the end of a daily wedge, the impending move... will be substantial. Meaning, it's going to be quite a long let. So before then, MMs will know and expect this. So what will they do? Well, they'll obviously have to have a default direction. And we'll have to look for clues along the way to the end of the wedge while they shake both sides out. But... they will take advantage and accumulate what gives them most profit, and those are the moves we look for. If we are in a nice, range, then happy us. But we gotta be careful for these type of moves. At the same time, we can take advantage of them, and even ride the classic entries during the run for profit (because we'll be waiting for time to build when they become weak). We can be very flexible and profit in many ways.

And I finally understand why trading without SL is important. Because you don't become those sitting ducks! Might as well just give them your money outright. It's a battlefield not just for them. We can fight, persist, and prevail.

For those who attack Tah, you don't understand that he trades what is is comfortable is. And he is acceptance to new ideas and improvements. He preaches PVSRA and then chooses to trade depending on how he wants to profit. It's not about building against the trend. It's about using this information to your advantage. And that's the mindset we should keep. To improve and refine our own trading. Cut, shape, and that rock will become a diamond.

And know, where ever you are, there is ALWAYS someone better than you. We must learn from those people and help our fellow man (who is having trouble), b/c we know, we've been there. And in the end, you will prosper not b/c you have made a ton of money, but b/c you have helped out so many people. The community and bond we build is special and positive, that can only boost our confidence and trading psychology, while alleviating the hard times. And we will have hard times. But we'll learn from them.

And if anyone here does have that much of an interest to tell us how crazy we are, and I hope you sincerely mean to help us as your true intent, then by all means, I insist you to start a thread and show us your holy grail. Show us and help us trade better. It will be far more profitable for everyone (time and effort) than to sprout the basic rules and paradigms that have plague our ancestors. If you don't step out of the came, how would you even know the world around you.

-qFish
insanity: Doing the same thing over... and expecting different results -AE
  • #55,955
  • Aug 10, 2013 9:58am Aug 10, 2013 9:58am
Quoting DmitryFX
HOW DID I GET HOW DOES PVSRA WORKS. let us imagine we have found the trend (1-2-3 or MA's etc) or the trade pattern (pin bar, H&S etc) or retracement from FIBO level or whatever else it doesn't matter what exactly but something what giving us very clear signal (from classical point of view) to buy or to sell. I suppose most of all traders educated the same way (personally I did test many trading system and most of them showing signals the same time +/-). Thats why they are doing the same trades the same time. But look if all traders are selling...
Thank you DmitryFX. You've hit it on the nail. And THAT is the FALLACY of TECHNICAL ANALYSIS!

Don't get me wrong, we can still use technical analysis, b/c we know.. MMs will create these patterns for us, and we can take advantage of that. But we are also aware of what they are doing behind the lines. So having the knowledge of TA and MMs playbook, we can trade accordingly to take their punches, and still prevail.
insanity: Doing the same thing over... and expecting different results -AE
  • #55,956
  • Aug 10, 2013 10:00am Aug 10, 2013 10:00am
Quoting traderathome
PVSRA Results for 1st Nineteen Weeks The following are the results of my trading the Sonic R. System using PVSRA to determine if it is a bull or bear market, and then trading the price action I see. Week ending 04/05 1289 pips gained, 7 trades totaling 19 parts (18 parts winners), averaging 67+ pips per each of all parts. Week ending 04/12 1891 pips gained, 9 trades totaling 28 parts (all parts winners), averaging 67+ pips per each of all parts. Week ending 04/19 2160 pips gained, 9 trades totaling 31 parts (29 parts winners), averaging 69+ pips...
Splendid! 108pips/part.
insanity: Doing the same thing over... and expecting different results -AE
  • #55,957
  • Edited 10:21am Aug 10, 2013 10:02am | Edited 10:21am
Quoting traderathome
{quote} {quote} Sonic, Be careful. This is in a down trend that could be growing, and going for more..... {image} {image} {image} {image}
Gold

And so, with Friday concluded, what is the picture? Well, all that happened Friday was that the price remained at the highs it was pushed to on Thursday, and at those highs the trading was done. Now, who is in control of the prices? The biggest banks. And if they want the price moved up for trading, what positions do you think they are taking, longs or shorts?

What with everyone and their uncle proclaiming to buy gold, to own gold, what is going on? Simple. They are correct, it is just that their timing is off,......mayby way off!

Cheap, no, cheaper gold is the only salvation of the big banks and the central banks. They need and covet gold, and the lower the price the better for them to achieve gathering it in. Yes, maybe some day when currencies (remember, largely fiat currencies,...backed only by the full faith of the shitty banks) begin to fail, as in people no longer trusting the banks, then gold will soar in price (because the shitty banks will make it so). Just around that time is the time to be buying, not now! That time could be months, maybe more than a year, maybe more than a few years yet away. Of that, there is no predicting. But the signs of currency difficulties and civil distrust will be evident when it comes, and before the reversal in the trend of gold prices becomes firmly entrenched.

Meanwhile, the big banks (and central banks) will keep the push on for cheap, and cheaper gold, so they can increase their tonnage as inexpensively as possible, against the time when countries will demand back their tonnage stored in other countries, tonnage that is missing because it was "leased out", and against the time that "citizens" no longer trust the bullshit fiat money cranked out by the banks, and the just as worthless printed money cranked out by the central banks of governments,.....and start converting their "paper" back into "metal".

But, this is just an opinion.

-tah
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: aug 2013 - 063.png Size: 57 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: aug 2013 - 064.png Size: 74 KB
  • #55,958
  • Aug 10, 2013 10:04am Aug 10, 2013 10:04am
Quoting qFish
{quote} Thank you DmitryFX. You've hit it on the nail. And THAT is the FALLACY of TECHNICAL ANALYSIS! Don't get me wrong, we can still use technical analysis, b/c we know.. MMs will create these patterns for us, and we can take advantage of that. But we are also aware of what they are doing behind the lines. So having the knowledge of TA and MMs playbook, we can trade accordingly to take their punches, and still prevail.
I think better to say not FALLACY but EASTERN EGGS or HACKED TECHNICAL ANALYSIS.
Everything is possible!!! Step by Step...
  • #55,959
  • Aug 10, 2013 10:15am Aug 10, 2013 10:15am
Quoting traderathome
{quote} PVSRA: Bulls or Bears? Do We Trade Long or Short? qFish posted an interesting chart, which I reposted this past week. Essentially, the chart suggested that, for example, as price begins an inter-day swing up, and moves on up to eventually roll over and reverse, that throughout the process the MMs are both building long and short positions. It suggests that the MMs short at the highs and long at the lows of the price cycles within the overall move up. As price moves up towards completion of the move, the MMs focus on closing the longs for...
I'm afraid that you didn't get my point yet. You are wrong if you think I'm against you way or trading. There is a difference between to be against one thing and to want to improve it.

I'm just saying that we MUST improve this system, it's our duty. And the primary target must be to find a better point to start to build the position. How? Well, I'm trying to find that how, and you should do it as well. I always said to you that you start to build too soon, and that is fact. Building position works fine, but it could work way better imho. Even when you make money, you can say "that trade was a bad one". A good building position should achieve 2 targets imho:

  1. DD/Profit ratio at least 1:1. This mean that if you have a 3k pips DD, u should close at least with 3k pips in profit
  2. All the orders closed in positive

Assuming that you were right when you detected that MMs were bears/bulls, that would mean that the price should go above below that first scout. Otherwise, you were wrong about that analysis. As an example I'll use you last EA trade (image attached). For me, that was not a good trade (even if u made money), because the DD/profit ratio is too small and you closed 8 orders in negative. It's ok, you had profits, but you have to admit, that trade could be improved.

PVSRA building position works, it's proved, and I think it's the time to improve the method because the potential is awesome, and we must sit down and study how to do it.

Best, Tymedu.

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: aug 2013 - 059.png Size: 69 KB
To fail is just an opportunity to learn
  • #55,960
  • Edited 10:57am Aug 10, 2013 10:45am | Edited 10:57am
Here is something that I've been thinking about for some time, that I will begin testing. We use PVSRA to guide us in what is currently happening in terms of MMs building, running, or both. The key signals are those near reversals, when prices go into accumulation and they are playing their tricks.

I noted that it's not advantageous to start building late game, but it's actually not that bad, b/c the loss will still be minimal and we will be close to break even anyways.

Have a look, and tell me what you think guys. I see too many positives with this approach.

The time frame is H4! Important!

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Building With the Trend.png Size: 86 KB


-qFish
insanity: Doing the same thing over... and expecting different results -AE
78 traders viewing now