• Home
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 6:41am
Menu
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • News
  • Calendar
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Login
  • Join
  • 6:41am
Sister Sites
  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Elliott Wave Trading by Ayax 1,946 replies

elliott wave trading channel 22 replies

Group Trading based on Elliott wave and Harmonics 0 replies

The Basics of Elliott Wave Theory 128 replies

Elliotters..Elliott Wave Trading 9 replies

  • Interactive Trading
  • /
  • Reply to Thread
  • Subscribe
  • 6,139
Attachments: Elliott Wave Trading
Exit Attachments
Tags: Elliott Wave Trading
Cancel

Elliott Wave Trading

  • Last Post
  •  
  • 1 272273Page 274275276 457
  • 1 Page 274 457
  •  
  • Post #5,461
  • Quote
  • Edited 5:04am Oct 22, 2012 5:03am | Edited 5:04am
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
Quoting Almondeyed
Disliked
Thank you again for comments

I stopped to follow EWI when they were expecting huge drop in Corn futures with their Wave 3 and after Corn made historical rally.. Lost enough with their help I am sure they added some more patterns and update guidelines after i left.

By the way;
If 1.3172 is Wave A then Wave B is 33.3% of Wave A
If current low 1.3014 is the end of down move and it is Wave b of Wave 3 then it is 50% of Wave a
Ignored

Correct on Wave B

Apologies I forgot the Wave (i) to 1.3071, pullback in Wave (ii) to 1.2825 and then take the comments above for Wave -i-, -ii- and Wave -a-... thus we are in Wave -b- of Wave -iii- of Wave (a). At least, that's the plan...
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,462
  • Quote
  • Oct 22, 2012 5:20am Oct 22, 2012 5:20am
  •  Almondeyed
  • | Joined Apr 2012 | Status: ipsa scientia potestas est | 682 Posts
Quoting Ian Copsey
Disliked
Correct on Wave B

Apologies I forgot the Wave (i) to 1.3071, pullback in Wave (ii) to 1.2825 and then take the comments above for Wave -i-, -ii- and Wave -a-... thus we are in Wave -b- of Wave -iii- of Wave (a). At least, that's the plan...
Ignored
thus we are in Wave -b- of Wave -iii- of Wave (a). At least, that's the plan...

or Wave (c)

Wave -b- of Wave -iii- of Wave (c) i mean....
 
 
  • Post #5,463
  • Quote
  • Oct 22, 2012 6:32am Oct 22, 2012 6:32am
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
Quoting Almondeyed
Disliked
thus we are in Wave -b- of Wave -iii- of Wave (a). At least, that's the plan...

or Wave (c)

Wave -b- of Wave -iii- of Wave (c) i mean....
Ignored
Wave (a) of Wave (iii) of Wave (C).
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,464
  • Quote
  • Oct 22, 2012 6:46am Oct 22, 2012 6:46am
  •  Almondeyed
  • | Joined Apr 2012 | Status: ipsa scientia potestas est | 682 Posts
Now clear.. Thank you very much
 
 
  • Post #5,465
  • Quote
  • Oct 22, 2012 6:40pm Oct 22, 2012 6:40pm
  •  o man
  • | Membership Revoked | Joined Oct 2011 | 42 Posts
just wanna share
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: untitled.GIF
Size: 20 KB

happy trading
 
 
  • Post #5,466
  • Quote
  • Oct 24, 2012 11:25pm Oct 24, 2012 11:25pm
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
When counting waves with R.N. Elliott's structure many Elliotticians ignore small corrections and automatically label the major swing highs and swing lows. This video explains why these need to be followed and measured carefully to generate pinpoint forecasting.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qaj7OFXIpd8&feature=plcp
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,467
  • Quote
  • Oct 28, 2012 11:04am Oct 28, 2012 11:04am
  •  o man
  • | Membership Revoked | Joined Oct 2011 | 42 Posts
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Elliott Wave Analysis 29 Oct.GIF
Size: 14 KB

please check this
 
 
  • Post #5,468
  • Quote
  • Oct 29, 2012 2:08am Oct 29, 2012 2:08am
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
Quoting o man
Disliked
Attachment 1067288
please check this
Ignored
Take a look at this... http://harmonicelliottwave.blogspot....or-usdjpy.html

My upper target reached so should now correct lower...
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,469
  • Quote
  • Oct 30, 2012 3:38am Oct 30, 2012 3:38am
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
Here's a view on the Dollar Index...

DOLLAR INDEX
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,470
  • Quote
  • Oct 30, 2012 3:58am Oct 30, 2012 3:58am
  •  tirmizi
  • | Additional Username | Joined Sep 2012 | 914 Posts
hi GM traders

i think on shorter time frame we are in wave i and thrust i believe should be above 2955 or min 2947
Learning Requires Failure
 
 
  • Post #5,471
  • Quote
  • Oct 30, 2012 10:32am Oct 30, 2012 10:32am
  •  Almondeyed
  • | Joined Apr 2012 | Status: ipsa scientia potestas est | 682 Posts
http://imageplay.net/img/tya22290186...1030111727.jpg

I am too busy to compare price levels with fibo ratios, but at first sight this count looks not bad
 
 
  • Post #5,472
  • Quote
  • Oct 30, 2012 9:31pm Oct 30, 2012 9:31pm
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
Quoting Almondeyed
Disliked
http://imageplay.net/img/tya22290186...1030111727.jpg

I am too busy to compare price levels with fibo ratios, but at first sight this count looks not bad
Ignored
You could be right there but until the last swing high is broken there is risk of a minor new low before reversing higher...
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,473
  • Quote
  • Oct 30, 2012 9:32pm Oct 30, 2012 9:32pm
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
In addition to the beauty of the fractal nature of Harmonic Elliott Wave that requires wave targets to be confirmed from multiple wave degrees there is also the consistency of wave projection ratios that exist across all wave degrees and time frames from the 1 minute charts to the monthly charts...

The following video demonstrates these repetitive ratio clusters through the wave degrees and markets.

THE CONSISTENCY OF PROJECTION RATIOS
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,474
  • Quote
  • Nov 4, 2012 4:34pm Nov 4, 2012 4:34pm
  •  knightpips
  • | Joined Jan 2012 | Status: Member | 193 Posts
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: 2012-11-04_0243.png
Size: 30 KB
 
 
  • Post #5,475
  • Quote
  • Nov 8, 2012 6:29pm Nov 8, 2012 6:29pm
  •  o man
  • | Membership Revoked | Joined Oct 2011 | 42 Posts
happy weekend guys

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: untitled.GIF
Size: 18 KB

-------
elliott wave mq4
 
 
  • Post #5,476
  • Quote
  • Nov 14, 2012 1:28am Nov 14, 2012 1:28am
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
In a previous video I explained how momentum could be used to identify stronger trade set ups at the end of a trend through divergences. In this video I provide an example how multiple time frame momentum can be used to prevent entering a trade...

FILTERING OUT BAD TRADES USING MOMENTUM

Good trading
Ian
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,477
  • Quote
  • Nov 24, 2012 3:46am Nov 24, 2012 3:46am
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
Quoting Flynchenberg
Disliked
Hi guys,

My Outlook for EUR/USD: Very important level. Greece deal result might be a beginning of a new wave up.

Take care,
Seb

PS: More on my blog.
Ignored
There are an awful lot of overlapping 1's and 4's there... Any reason?
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,478
  • Quote
  • Nov 24, 2012 5:34pm Nov 24, 2012 5:34pm
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
On many occasions I see Elliott Wave Counts that contain running corrections that imply excessive expansions of the previous correction. In fact, there are regular guidelines on expansions that contain any expansion and this video provides an outline of when an expansion becomes an extension in a higher degree wave... As a basic rule, if you cannot forecast where a move will end then there is something wrong. In general all moves can be forecast. The following video provides a guideline to how to anticipate these.

RUNNING CORRECTIONS

Good trading
Ian Copsey
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Post #5,479
  • Quote
  • Nov 24, 2012 6:23pm Nov 24, 2012 6:23pm
  •  infinitus
  • Joined Jun 2010 | Status: s = k log W | 20,603 Posts
maybe this


do not complain about the many expansion lines. It is all Ian's fault, because I read his book and now I am trying out his %-numbers along with the fibs LOL


maybe we see a little pop higher, 3025?


What does the Master of Harmonic think?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge

Name: Chart_EUR_USD_Hourly_snapshot.jpg
Size: 216 KB
 
 
  • Post #5,480
  • Quote
  • Nov 25, 2012 12:13am Nov 25, 2012 12:13am
  •  Ian Copsey
  • | Commercial Member | Joined Nov 2010 | 447 Posts
Quoting infinitus
Disliked
maybe this


do not complain about the many expansion lines. It is all Ian's fault, because I read his book and now I am trying out his %-numbers along with the fibs LOL


maybe we see a little pop higher, 3025?


What does the Master of Harmonic think?
Ignored
Great to see you trying it out! I think if you look at the first move higher ending just below where you have Wave A and call that lower high Wave (i) and then after an expanded flat the Wave (ii) you may find the projections easier to work out... My basic view is bullish in the larger wave degree and thus within the weekly outlook you have to decide what the outlook is and understand how to fit in a 5-wave move, what it will take etc.

I'd thoroughly recommend instead of those lines on the chart that you download the HEW spreadsheet from my (grotty but soon to be upgraded) website you can plug the numbers in there and begin to coordinate the Wave (c) of Wave (iii), use alternation to understand where the Wave (iv) is and then project the Wave (v) - keeping in mind the (Elliott guideline) prior Wave (b) high in the decline at 1.3020...

You'll actually find, once you have a good grip of HEW that the targets can already be estimated if you know where your final target is. For example, in my book I called the DOW up to 12,600 +/- 200 points to be followed by a drop of 20%. That call was made with an idea of Wave the Wave (iii) should be so that an approximate 50% retracement in Wave (iv) would then be able to reach somewhere around the 14K high... Then, with that in mind I looked at the potential projections in Wave (iii) in the spreadsheet and matching with the Wave (c) projections... (Wave (c) is subordinate to the impulsive projections.)
No I haven't got the wave structure wrong! I've corrected it!
 
 
  • Interactive Trading
  • /
  • Elliott Wave Trading
  • Reply to Thread
    • 1 272273Page 274275276 457
    • 1 Page 274 457
0 traders viewing now
  • More
Top of Page
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
About FF
  • Mission
  • Products
  • User Guide
  • Media Kit
  • Blog
  • Contact
FF Products
  • Forums
  • Trades
  • Calendar
  • News
  • Market
  • Brokers
  • Trade Explorer
FF Website
  • Homepage
  • Search
  • Members
  • Report a Bug
Follow FF
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

FF Sister Sites:

  • Metals Mine
  • Energy EXCH
  • Crypto Craft

Forex Factory® is a brand of Fair Economy, Inc.

Terms of Service / ©2023