EURUSD

So Jungs ... jetzt mal aufgepasst ...

I did short it from 1.48760 ... with a limit order ...

And here covered some parts ... at 1.48603 ...

Breaking 4771 or 4633 Is where you can consider shorts but here? are you mental?

That's the way I see it with a H4 view of EUR/USD ...



;-|

Nice MACD Bearish Divergence.

Seb

Let it go to 1.5......i am shortting from here.

Sicherlich alles kann passieren ...

Nichts ist unmöglich - außer Toyota ...

Be Always Prepaired For The Unexpected ... so lautete stets unsere Parole ...

Aber ich würd' mal sagen ... so langsam sind wir am "Anschlag" ... * translation => prior to an end of bullish move energy ...

Sorry ... nur meine dusslige Ansicht ...



;-|

So you agree of seeing 1.5 but still want to short?

KISS

I would be looking more at 1.4905 than 1.5 though...

Genau ...

But not confirmed at this stage ... but I would like to say ... a possible development of bearish divergence ...

Frühindikator ... we name it ... * sorry - I don't know the ENGLISH expression for that ... and even when I look into a dictionary ... even then I am not confident about it if it has same metaphorical sense as in our language ...

We still have to wait for a confirmation ...

Ein vorauseilender Frühindikator eben ...

http://www.forexfactory.com/images/icons/icon13.gif

What is wrong with shorting into resistance?

+16.

No....i don't agree it is going to 1.5 but i see a double top there.

last 5 one hour candles have been strange. no trade for me yet.

Frühindikator {m}
econ.fin.stat. lead indicator
econ.fin.stat. leading indicator
Is this what you mean?

früh mean "early"

HMMM Not good for EURUSD BULLS. Is it time for these instituions to dump all their eurusd long contracts?
I smell frantic market panic.

http://www.forexlive.com/index.php?s...Investigations

PARIS (MNI) – The European Commission said Friday it has initiated
two antitrust investigations into the behavior of sixteen U.S. and
European investment banks active in the credit default swaps (CDS)
market.
The first case will examine whether the sixteen banks, along with
leading financial information provider Markit, “have colluded and/or may
hold and abuse a dominant position in order to control the financial
information on CDS.” Such behavior, “if proven,” would violate the
European Union’s anti-trust rules, the Commission said.
The second case will look at the relationship between nine of the
banks and ICE Clear Europe, which is the leading clearing house for CDS.
In particular, the Commission wants to determine whether preferential
tariffs granted by ICE to the nine banks have the effect of “locking
them in the ICE system” to the detriment of competing clearers.
CDS gained considerable notoriety during the financial crisis
because they were used to speculate against some large institutions and
later against Greece in the early days of the Eurozone’s sovereign debt
turmoil.
CDS are meant to protect investors in case a company or a sovereign
government in which they have invested defaults on its payments. But
they are also used as speculative instruments.
“CDS play a useful role for financial markets and for the economy,”
the Commission said in a written statement. “Recent developments have
shown, however, that the trading of this asset class suffers a number of
inefficiencies that cannot be solved through regulation alone. We are
therefore opening two new cases to improve market transparency and
fairness in the CDS market.”
The sixteen banks being targeted in the CDS probe are: JP Morgan,
Bank of America Merrill Lynch, Barclays, BNP Paribas, Citigroup,
Commerzbank, Credit Suisse First Boston, Deutsche Bank, Goldman Sachs,
HSBC, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Scotland, UBS, Wells Fargo
Bank/Wachovia, Credit Agricole, and Societe Generale.
The probe will also examine the license and distribution agreements
of Markit, a UK-based company created originally to enhance transparency
in the CDS market. Markit is also known for the purchasing managers’
index (PMI), a widely watched forward-looking economic indicator in many
major economies of the world.
“The Commission is now concerned certain clauses in Markit’s
licence and distribution agreements could be abusive and impede the
development of competition in the market for the provision of CDS
information,” the Commission said.

Yes ... thank you ...


Thank you to you too ...

You are both right somehow ... and not ...

Dictionary says "leading indicator" would be right translation ...

But that is the elusiveness of words in / with translations ... Idiomatic and metaphorical picture is not quite the same ...

We have another impression of that in our head ...



;-|

Seems to be taking downtrend.