Psych Levels, Pivots, and Trendlines - Resurrected
Bloody hell, I was only joking, man!! Don't you ever eat?
Actually I just cooked up some cracking meatballs but I've seriously gotta crash soon! Trouble is I'm glued to the screen at the moment... someone needs to drag me away before my eyes go square!
Good morning all,
First trade of the day was a nice little doji.
That candle was "hammer" in classic terminology (its mirror version is a "shooting star"), aka "pinbar"
Great trade, Dan! And nice RR thinking too!
Thanks! I always hope to achieve a 1:1 RR ratio and if I can grab a bit more then I'll be very very pleased!
Had one more on the U/J just a little while ago. A bearish engulfing candle (based on the full candle including wicks) formed over the 97.00 which gave a short bias which was also favoured by the MAs. I took the break of the low at 96.86 and rode it out for 25 pips!
I hope I'm not being too irritating posting these, I'm just very excited at the moment!!!
- http://www.hquotes.com/tradehard/simulator.html Thanks! I always hope to achieve a 1:1 RR ratio and if I can grab a bit more then I'll be very very pleased!
Had one more on the U/J just a little while ago. A bearish engulfing candle (based on the full candle including wicks) formed over the 97.00 which gave a short bias which was also favoured by the MAs. I took the break of the low at 96.86 and rode it out for 25 pips!
I hope I'm not being too irritating posting these, I'm just very excited at the moment!!!
Another great trade! Don't get (too) excited - it's good to forget your profits even quicker than your losses
As for RR (and 1:1), play with this tool, you'll see it all for yourself
I shall try and contain myself!
...fruition of a good trade ...demise of a bad one!
Look at the choice of words to describe the random outcome of a numbers game...RR is a hotly debated subject
Another perfect example of avoiding the only real issue here... His participation here and on some other threads has in the end become something of a disruption.
I won't add to the contention here and endlessly debate yet another newly registered psuedo supporter beyond this post, as you will be on my Ignore list in about 1 minute and m4n already is.
The simple question is why does he feel he has to impose his methods and techniques here and elsewhere instead of simply... starting his own thread where he and all the folks like you who apparently support him so ardently could happily exchange posts on whether the candle is red or green, or anything you care to discuss without interference.
You're new here but you should know there has been a rash of thread disruptions lately from posters with similar attitudes as both of yours crashing established threads before moving on, or starting their own threads simply to have a platform from which to flame other threads. Some of them have gotten banned in the process, and their threads binned.
There have also been DoS attacks lately on FF in the same general time frame of some of these bannings. That's serious stuff. Coincidence maybe... and the appropriate folks are looking into it. Overall tolerance for sustained disruptive behavior is diminishing quickly. It's always amazing how brand new posters can come out of the woodwork precisely at the peak of contention and side with the agitators with no apparent worries about consequences...
My point is that if you have an agenda not in line with the already established focus and goals of the thread you're posting on, and it becomes an issue, then the focus eventually turns on you as well. It's not a "public thread" issue and you can't hide behind the Letter of the Law while ignoring the Spirit and intent of it. A troll is a troll... is a troll. Don't be one.
It was M4N's idea to stop posting, and I seconded it. I'll even third it.
In any event I stand by my post and you can get off your High Horse. Unless it's your intent to contribute in a constructive way to this thread which to this point in your handful of posts and one week at FF you have not, you're in the wrong thread as well.
This has been and will continue to be one of the better threads at FF. That's non-negotiable.
Nice to hear from you again, Happy. Trust you are well?
On your chart, that may well have been a pair of tweezers, but on my chart, it was nowhere near. Neither the upper shadow nor the body of the second candle matched the first one, although on Dan's chart I could see it came VERY near! Still, not to worry. I appreciate your coming in, Happy, as we haven't heard from you for quite a while.
Cheers for now.
, thank you, I am well, and I read the tread, but don't write. On my 2 MTrs it is not tweezer, I just gave a information about the James16-signal -on the chart of Dan he has two similar tops - the trade from James16 is sell below the lows. 
