DislikedSure my friend,
The gold line 122.72 broke, i had my order 10 pips away (always) and hold it up to 124.
Look how the retracement supported on the blue 123.57.
May the ride continue... hopefully.Ignored
No brainer fundamental trades 55 replies
This time... I'm Keeping MY MONEY (BRV - No Brainer Trades) 3 replies
The Koala System (No brainer) 127 replies
EUR/GBP SHORT for No Brainer 67 replies
Selling USD and YEN is a no brainer. 12 replies
DislikedSure my friend,
The gold line 122.72 broke, i had my order 10 pips away (always) and hold it up to 124.
Look how the retracement supported on the blue 123.57.
May the ride continue... hopefully.Ignored
Dislikedbecause the dx was at major support. This move back allowed for pros on the wrong side to exit. It also allows for people that believe in the break to enter if they missed it. The sole purpose of the market is to transact as much business as possible. This back and forth movement allows for thisIgnored
DislikedHI Ady27, If you dont mind, can I have some questions for you ? what do you mean by "my order 10 pips away"? Does that mean you have a stop order 10 pips above the gold line 122.72? What is your stop-loss? Can you tell me how you trade the breakout? How you deal with the fakebreakout? Thanks~~Ignored
DislikedHi Everyone,
Picked up 213 today on a nice Supply and Demand trade on the E/U. Anyone else get it? If everyday could be like this.
Mike GIgnored
DislikedGW,
OK, so my previous tounge-in-cheek fell flat. Sorry.
What we have here is called a triangle in a downtrend. There are many different patterns like this; triangles, descending and ascending triangles, descending and ascending wedges, flags, pennants, etc. Here is a good source for information: http://www.investopedia.com/terms/t/triangle.asp.
A triangle is basically a horizontal pattern. A descending triangle will have a flat lower edge and an ascending triangle will have a flat upper edge.
Many people have attributed...Ignored
DislikedGW,
I find it easier for me to trade breakouts.
It seem that I not confident to trade fade outs.
This is something I need to work (out-s).
What fade lines do you see now, and more important WHY?Ignored
Dislikedady27,
I know you addressed this to GW, but I thought I'd talk about it. When I first started trading, I only traded breakouts. I definitely found it easier, psychologically, to trade them. However I think only trading breakouts, or only fading, are both the result of tunnel-vision and never a good thing. You can easily still maintain nice profitability and consistency only fading though, while I don't believe you can only trading breakouts (of course you can be profitable, but you won't have as many trading opportunities is what I mean).
It's...Ignored
DislikedJust as we take a look at U/C, G/U etc, that same affect was visible on those all, so you presume it was nothing to do whit a fundamentals? i must say that i disagree, and that retrace from my opinion was a hysteric profit taking. again... just my opinion, i might aswell be wrong.Ignored
Dislikedady27,
I know you addressed this to GW, but I thought I'd talk about it. When I first started trading, I only traded breakouts. I definitely found it easier, psychologically, to trade them. However I think only trading breakouts, or only fading, are both the result of tunnel-vision and never a good thing. You can easily still maintain nice profitability and consistency only fading though, while I don't believe you can only trading breakouts (of course you can be profitable, but you won't have as many trading opportunities is what I mean).
It's...Ignored
DislikedALL those pairs broke trendlines and had huge moves upon breaking the trendlines, before completely retracing them. Again, to me that signals that it was a technical move NOT supported by fundamentals. The fundamentals are down (stocks getting killed again), so what fundamental reason was there for the E/U or G/U to bounce up? None. Traders covered profits and the move reversed to get back in line with the fundamentals. That is my take on what happened.
And for further evidence that it was a purely technical move: note that the USDJPY did NOT...Ignored
DislikedWell, still, every other USD pair did that move at the very same time. as i see it JPY has been gaining weight for some time now, so might that be if we look at psychology aspect in here that U/J would have been worst pair to trade for those news? even so, i do not disagree that it did break trendline in those pairs, i still believe it was a tandem effect. but as i see it we both can keep our opinions and be happy as i dont think we will ever get to know the absolute truthIgnored
DislikedIt was a clean breakout. It broke 1.2650 and accelerated and rose 150 pips in a few minutes. 150 pips in 40 minutes is no joke. Any time I have the opportunity get 150 pips in less than an hour, I'm ecstatic.
The fact that it has no come all the way back down almost as fast as it rose indicates to me that in no way are the fundamentals driving this trade, because the fundamentals don't change that fast. If it was just the fundamentals that caused the EURUSD to go up, why is it back down already? If anything, I'm reading it as a purely technical...Ignored
Dislikedhonestly who cares why this or that happened. The only thing that matters is how many pips you banked today from those moves and how many pips you riskedIgnored