Nice charts
Pip,
you got me thinking about early entry what not I am wondering risk reward or use higher tfs for a highly probabilistic entry.
... I am not trading these fibs since I am testing but I made most these fibs real time hence some sloppy and overshot getting my Pa legs down in the context fo fibs. .
I am not live or Demoing this. I am just charting and should it work i will apply MM and demo it. then live. Why complicate things unless you have something good to play with If it performs then whipdee skipdee I will HAPPILY do it all over again. if not I saved some time and got my heart broken again
Hopefully this is of interest or hleps someone OR they can save me from integrating crap into my testing before the truth outs . All suggestions are welcome.
i will post my full Stats after testing cycle is full complete.
Goal
To define, through testing, a repeatable methodlogy using fibs that is non-dscretional and 100% accurate.
Sub goal -
To define acceptable fuzz in tp on pairs to maintain 100% of wins.
Practice
I am practicing placing fibs all over a hand full of pairs as I have something concrete IMO to test finally.
I am mostly doing EU, EJ, GU, GJ, G/CHF, UJ, UCAD, UAUD, NJ, Chf/J. as a scatter, sample obviously favoring USD and yen crosses.
I used a homogenous method and the only thing discretionary-ish is where exactly to pull swings based on PA. . these are darn near all pip perfect IMO
A failure is determined by 100,0 being breached before a 138 is hit.
A success is target being hit within < 2 pips.
A question is a target that comes <10 pips and moves away to fail.
Question will help me define fuzz or fail.
EDIT the discretion comes in the pa part.
1MIN chart
All 1MIN fibs were pulled in the same style and the same methodology.
the third fib was hard because dead to rights I may have pull on that Demand bar but I was waiting for a lower low which might have been three bars back from where I did pull seeing as it hit support and reverberated all the consolidation.
Master Charts
Is the new cycle as I see it. The new chart is stripped to one open and one complete and no Gann Skunny. For testing everything right or wrong was draw the same way.
The red fib was draw on 15M I suppose the black fib could have been drawn on 4hr but it wasn;t.
I am working on being open to building in fuzz to the tp because it is could be construed as arrogant to try to hit to the pip. IMO as long as you are very close. Happy >right FTW.
two biggest practiceable, skill based things have been PA and patience. for me. I have a lot of work to go before I can decide if this is close though as I am a horrible gun jumper with fibs for some reason.
It is interesting see that as a group we all start getting "it" at the same time. like a bell curve;l) pipskateer was apparently on the far left side of the bell hehe, but as long as I am on the curve I am cool as a cucumber in a bowl of hot sauce.
let me know your thoughts gents/gals
Sizz.
Pip,
you got me thinking about early entry what not I am wondering risk reward or use higher tfs for a highly probabilistic entry.
... I am not trading these fibs since I am testing but I made most these fibs real time hence some sloppy and overshot getting my Pa legs down in the context fo fibs. .
I am not live or Demoing this. I am just charting and should it work i will apply MM and demo it. then live. Why complicate things unless you have something good to play with If it performs then whipdee skipdee I will HAPPILY do it all over again. if not I saved some time and got my heart broken again
Hopefully this is of interest or hleps someone OR they can save me from integrating crap into my testing before the truth outs . All suggestions are welcome.
i will post my full Stats after testing cycle is full complete.
Goal
To define, through testing, a repeatable methodlogy using fibs that is non-dscretional and 100% accurate.
Sub goal -
To define acceptable fuzz in tp on pairs to maintain 100% of wins.
Practice
I am practicing placing fibs all over a hand full of pairs as I have something concrete IMO to test finally.
I am mostly doing EU, EJ, GU, GJ, G/CHF, UJ, UCAD, UAUD, NJ, Chf/J. as a scatter, sample obviously favoring USD and yen crosses.
I used a homogenous method and the only thing discretionary-ish is where exactly to pull swings based on PA. . these are darn near all pip perfect IMO
A failure is determined by 100,0 being breached before a 138 is hit.
A success is target being hit within < 2 pips.
A question is a target that comes <10 pips and moves away to fail.
Question will help me define fuzz or fail.
EDIT the discretion comes in the pa part.
1MIN chart
All 1MIN fibs were pulled in the same style and the same methodology.
the third fib was hard because dead to rights I may have pull on that Demand bar but I was waiting for a lower low which might have been three bars back from where I did pull seeing as it hit support and reverberated all the consolidation.
Master Charts
Is the new cycle as I see it. The new chart is stripped to one open and one complete and no Gann Skunny. For testing everything right or wrong was draw the same way.
The red fib was draw on 15M I suppose the black fib could have been drawn on 4hr but it wasn;t.
I am working on being open to building in fuzz to the tp because it is could be construed as arrogant to try to hit to the pip. IMO as long as you are very close. Happy >right FTW.
two biggest practiceable, skill based things have been PA and patience. for me. I have a lot of work to go before I can decide if this is close though as I am a horrible gun jumper with fibs for some reason.
It is interesting see that as a group we all start getting "it" at the same time. like a bell curve;l) pipskateer was apparently on the far left side of the bell hehe, but as long as I am on the curve I am cool as a cucumber in a bowl of hot sauce.
let me know your thoughts gents/gals
Sizz.