Analysis and Trading based on Envelopes, Waves, Cycles

Another nail in the coffin.
The "Risk-Free" Rate: It is the primary rate used in Discounted Cash Flow (DCF) models to value stocks. When the 10-year yield goes up, the future cash flows of growth stocks are discounted more heavily, causing their valuations to drop.

Wow Terry some good stuff there
Andrew Pancholi is the guy that bought our
Mr Murrey to the Uk in June 2013
Had Andrew Free stuff for a while but to be honest found his paid for stuff far too expensive to get involved
Not to sure what you think of the
October thought's (thinking of Murrey dates
great exchange of though's
Enjoying it t and idea's happening on the thread now
from some good guys

Yeah the 18.6 property cycle is the North Node of the moon cycle, its also Gann's Financial Timetable - Louise McWhirter wrote a book in the 40's about it too when the NN enters various star signs, we are right in one of her zones right now (being the bottom of her business cycle) - it's a bit hit and miss but it has merits, although I don't use it

Stonehenge tracked all those moon cycles, eclipses etc - you can verify this by reading Gerald Hawkins 1960's book "Stonehenge Decoded"

Again Stonehenge is a CIRCLE, which allows you to place movements around and on the edge of the circle

I've never subscribed to AP's paid for information, from his YouTube channel it seems he looks at lot at a lot of cycles, gann number related, like 45 , 90 years back, which does show up, up until recently the SP500 has been moving nicely along with the 60 year cycle, but its moved out of sync now

Yeah the thing for me back in the 2010's was for me to consider Astro/Planets, the hit rate had to be 85%+ and most of what is written doesn't work better than 50%, so there's a lot of rubbish out there

The splitting of the circle into 90 and 120 degs doesn't apply to every market - I just showed those as easy examples

Same here with corn - follows the 120 degree movement of Uranus, then some of the internals follow the 30 degree movement - this is why you need decades of data to prove the hits - in 100 years we've had 8 hits of the big 120 degree movement, ALL arrived along with the cycle expectation, that's a 100% win rate - even though 2001 Inverted, the cycle still caused a major high or low point, if we say no it should of been a high not a low, so even though the cycle brought in a major turn it failed, well that's 7 hits out of 8 = 87.5% win rate at timing major highs/lows



I left exploring planets last, I wish I had done them first, it would of saved me a few wasted years back in the 2010's

The next best thing are cycles, but we can see sometimes they miss beats, so the 2 are pretty similar really, as when cycles show up, they move off the back of planets, so you get the move anyway by way of the cycle when it comes into being

As Cher sang
If only you could only
Turn Back Time

Then you can start messing around with planetary movements and use them as Gann Angles from various highs and lows

and after a while you start to see and understand why markets make a lot of those out of the blue moves

Here is a Mar/Jupiter combination trendline - on the chart we see wither the 1 x 1 or the 2 x 1 Gann Angle of this pairing





(Other planets and pairings work out which aren't shown)

As we mentioned the North Node in a previous post

The NN travels in a reverse direction to all the other planets , hence why the lines angle downwards from left to right - all the other planets travel upwards from left to right!

So couple the NN planetary line with the Saturn/Uranus 120 and 180 degrees from the 1987 low and you have a very high probability support area for a low and as we can see that is exactly what happened (there were other considerations too, but this is a solid explanation) - as we can see there are numerous repeating NN planetary lines on the chart, only a few of them are actually valid and its those ones that we have to know are valid in order to be able to trade off/from - which is the part I'm not willing to mention, but we have another set of planet based TA working out

Now you can't just start placing planetary lines on the chart and expect hits - WHY NOT?

Because, the game isn't that simple! The lines shown are based off a $1 to 1 Degree of NN movement - this means in 360 degrees of travel $360 of price movement - If only price moved as simple as that, we'd all be rich!

Different planets have different scaling of $ or cents per degree



Anyway, we can see its a bit more common than random for various methods, which shows the validity

Traders can explore further should they wish

I agree with your October entry Dave but only as a countertrend move. Here's the weekly and daily for SP500.
Weekly sets the overall tone which is bearish into early 2027
Daily shows a countertrend move from late Oct to early Jan.
These are pretty stable and haven't changed for the past few months but are only part of the picture. I also look at these, and will need to look again as we head into Oct
1. land cycle - which is peaking now and generally falls for 4 years
2. Decennial charts - which show weakness mid next year
3. Global liquidity - which is currently showing bearish divergence from price
4. Murrey math - which shows price at 8/8 for weekly & daily
5. Cyclic RSI - already rolled over
6. Bond yields - rising which is bad for stocks
7. Price action using centered MA's & fixed channels

Amazing my friend
I would be telling a little (porkie pie) if I said
I understand everything
but giving it ago
thanks as always