After looking ar the Monthly chart, I saw two charts that have a decent looking monthly trend.
EurJpy and GbpJpy.
As I said in previous post, will be adding into EurUsd as long as I have open positions, and it keeps making higher swing highs, and lows.
If my positions get stopped, EurJpy will probably be my most likely pair for the week. That is the game plan for the moment.
Just wanted to mention, I have little to no confidence in this entry strategy. I believe 30 pip stop loss on daily, and moving stops to BE so soon is a big mistake. I am trading it the way Graeme stated, just to see the results. I am pretty sure I know what they will be.
Even reading his description gives some major hints at this not being a good entry.
He said you trade until you have 5 positions. Wait 6 months, each position will be around 1200 pips.
You will have losses around 1500 pips.
Let's think about that a minute....
You are taking, at most, 1 trade a day. 5 trades a week. Now it will actually be less, there will be days where you cannot get to BE, but lets assume everyday.
When I first started this thread, I took 19 trades. Had around 50% breakeven, 50% loss.
I know it is only 19 trades, not near enough to be accurate data, but let's just go with that. I had zero open positions left.
Ok, 1500 pips loss at 30 pips per trade. 50 losing trades, 50 BE trades. 100 trades give or take. That is 4 to 5 months of trading, everyday.
He keeps mentioning 50:1 RR, like it means something. RR is a useless number by itself.
I could have 150:1 RR and still lose money. What really matters is how much loss you have for each surviving position. In his example, it is 300 pips.
That is the cost of each surviving leg.
Now, I have to ask myself, if I entered the daily, in a monthly trend, and in line with the daily trend, with a 300 pip stop loss, how many positions would survive before my 300 pip stop got hit.
I would bet the results would be better with the larger stop. Not only that, but, I doubt it would take near as long to establish long term positions.
And I know for a fact, it would be far less frustrating than watching 90%+ of your positions lose or BE for 5 months.
Smaller stops do not neccesarily mean less loss. Higher RR does not necessarily mean more profit.
I love the idea of the method, but, I believe it will work far better with less trades and more reasonable stops.
Btw, I am not advocating 300 pip stop losses by any means.
I will continue this way for a while, just to get a baseline of expectations.
EurJpy and GbpJpy.
As I said in previous post, will be adding into EurUsd as long as I have open positions, and it keeps making higher swing highs, and lows.
If my positions get stopped, EurJpy will probably be my most likely pair for the week. That is the game plan for the moment.
Just wanted to mention, I have little to no confidence in this entry strategy. I believe 30 pip stop loss on daily, and moving stops to BE so soon is a big mistake. I am trading it the way Graeme stated, just to see the results. I am pretty sure I know what they will be.
Even reading his description gives some major hints at this not being a good entry.
He said you trade until you have 5 positions. Wait 6 months, each position will be around 1200 pips.
You will have losses around 1500 pips.
Let's think about that a minute....
You are taking, at most, 1 trade a day. 5 trades a week. Now it will actually be less, there will be days where you cannot get to BE, but lets assume everyday.
When I first started this thread, I took 19 trades. Had around 50% breakeven, 50% loss.
I know it is only 19 trades, not near enough to be accurate data, but let's just go with that. I had zero open positions left.
Ok, 1500 pips loss at 30 pips per trade. 50 losing trades, 50 BE trades. 100 trades give or take. That is 4 to 5 months of trading, everyday.
He keeps mentioning 50:1 RR, like it means something. RR is a useless number by itself.
I could have 150:1 RR and still lose money. What really matters is how much loss you have for each surviving position. In his example, it is 300 pips.
That is the cost of each surviving leg.
Now, I have to ask myself, if I entered the daily, in a monthly trend, and in line with the daily trend, with a 300 pip stop loss, how many positions would survive before my 300 pip stop got hit.
I would bet the results would be better with the larger stop. Not only that, but, I doubt it would take near as long to establish long term positions.
And I know for a fact, it would be far less frustrating than watching 90%+ of your positions lose or BE for 5 months.
Smaller stops do not neccesarily mean less loss. Higher RR does not necessarily mean more profit.
I love the idea of the method, but, I believe it will work far better with less trades and more reasonable stops.
Btw, I am not advocating 300 pip stop losses by any means.
I will continue this way for a while, just to get a baseline of expectations.