Jan 11, 2006
Previous: -5.1B
Estimate: -4.9B
Actual: -6.0B
Previous: -5.1B
Estimate: -4.9B
Actual: -6.0B
Attached Image
- #1
- First Post: Jan 11, 2007 5:45am Jan 11, 2007 5:45am
- Joined Jul 2006 | Status: Trader | 2,924 Posts
- #14
- Edited 3:33pm Feb 9, 2007 4:05am | Edited 3:33pm
- Joined Jul 2006 | Status: Trader | 2,924 Posts
Feb 9, 2006
*(UK) DEC VISIBLE TRADE BALANCE: -£7.14B V -£6.9BE;
TOTAL TRADE BALANCE: -£4.89B V -£4.25BE
- Trade Balance Non-EU: -£4.89B v -£4.5B
- Prior Visible Trade balance revised lower to -£6.87B from -£7.19B
- Prior Trade balance Non EU revised lower to -£4.36B from -£4.63B
- Prior Total Trade Balance revised lower to -£4.5B from -£4..72B
Anecdote:
I have several charts confirming that upon release of news, GBPUSD spiked 13~14 pips down (as the headline number was GBP negative). However over at FXCM, the spike was 24 pips up.
Therefore, I edited the attached chart reflecting the price movement as seen with other brokers.
*(UK) DEC VISIBLE TRADE BALANCE: -£7.14B V -£6.9BE;
TOTAL TRADE BALANCE: -£4.89B V -£4.25BE
- Trade Balance Non-EU: -£4.89B v -£4.5B
- Prior Visible Trade balance revised lower to -£6.87B from -£7.19B
- Prior Trade balance Non EU revised lower to -£4.36B from -£4.63B
- Prior Total Trade Balance revised lower to -£4.5B from -£4..72B
Anecdote:
I have several charts confirming that upon release of news, GBPUSD spiked 13~14 pips down (as the headline number was GBP negative). However over at FXCM, the spike was 24 pips up.
Therefore, I edited the attached chart reflecting the price movement as seen with other brokers.
