DAX 1 mn
1
Forecast Forex using Numeric Cycles and Astrology Cycles 38 replies
Planetary cycles, astrological theory of cycles of the markets 509 replies
Planetary Cycles... Plotting Cycles into the Future 0 replies
Market Waves are NOT Cycles 8 replies
Waves/Trends/Cycles 0 replies
DislikedThe Focal Points remind me of the Gaps. Gaps will most of the time be filled, but NOT ALWAYS. There are pips to be made when they do fill. Focal Points have a tendency to fill too. It is good to have a Gap indicator to mark the Gaps, but no indicator is really needed for the Gaps or the Focal Points. There are as many ways to trade as there are ways to build a house. It's all about what suites your style. If anyone would like the settings for the Displace MAs, I use let me know. Just my view & nothing more. _______________________________________...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hey Acetrade! Can you share your settings with us? Also, Can you into more depth on how you trade exactly?? thanks so muchIgnored
Disliked{quote} Hey Acetrade! Can you share your settings with us? Also, Can you into more depth on how you trade exactly?? thanks so muchIgnored
Disliked{quote} Hey Acetrade! Can you share your settings with us? Also, Can you into more depth on how you trade exactly?? thanks so muchIgnored
Dislikedhi fellows, what's the point to use BB? i used them and it's one of the million indicator that just redraws itself MA 200, MA 61 and some other MA > 200 could be better solution, what do you think? if you don't mind could you please send some examples of 'Envelopes'?Ignored
Dislikedhi fellows, what's the point to use BB? i used them and it's one of the million indicator that just redraws itself MA 200, MA 61 and some other MA > 200 could be better solution, what do you think? if you don't mind could you please send some examples of 'Envelopes'?Ignored
DislikedMaybe it's taken me a bit long for the light bulb to turn on regarding the numbers parisboy uses regularly for his MA lengths: 16,32,64,128,256 - all multiples of 2 and related in the following way: 2^4 = 16 2^5 = 32 2^6 = 64 2^7 = 128 2^8 = 256 A nice thing about all of these numbers is that they all divide down by 2 with no remainders due to the property of being a power of 2. For instance 32/2 = 16 /2 = 8 /2 = 4/2 = 2/2 = 1 or 2*2*2*2 = 2^4 While a common number - namely the even numbers that are multiples of ten like 30 divide down rather differently...Ignored