Disliked{quote} Hey, if it's true that Tech can be reinstated, and for that matter other members, then so be it. Why would I hide that truth. I'd be the first to proclaim that to the FF member community. I think alot of members here would then like to say something about it though. I just think it's odd that this kind of conversation can actually occur. I guess you're special.Ignored
I see no issue with the Admin discussing this. Yes there is a line of course on what to discuss and what not to discuss, but if a member inquires about the status of another member, I think its information that should be available. Especially around the basics of Why did someone get revoked, can they come back etc. I didn't see anything fxpipper mentioned with his conversation with Twee that would be considered crossing the line.
Its simple stuff. If thats the high level context of the conversation with Twee, no issues from me on him discussing it with other members.
I think you are right, there are some members that would have something to say about that based on some of the things we read here, I wonder if that would play a role in the re-instatement?
Membership can be revoked: We know this, I would think any re-instatement wording would be found here.
One Username at a time: This one here leads me to believe a revoked member could just open another username, following the rule of only one at a time (Other one being revoked and not used).
Swing the AXE..HARD w/ Effort, Consistency and Patience
1