EURUSD | Page 60322 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CHF

Similar Threads

MT4: how to change "EURUSD" to "#EURUSD"? 3 replies

Re: EurUsd short term 15 replies

did oanda just drop its spread for eurusd to 1 pip? 11 replies

EA for multiple lot limit order for EURUSD 0 replies

NFP nice bump up on EURUSD 2 replies

Attachments: EURUSD
Exit Attachments

EURUSD

  • #1,206,421
  • Dec 13, 2021 9:36am Dec 13, 2021 9:36am
Quoting MatDerKater
{quote} What is going down wrt to Covid19 and all the preposterously disproportionate yet very dangerous precedents that are being set, is so patently obvious, that it stuns me that so many can't see it. I would have thought that traders especially, who are accustomed to treating 'news' with the contempt and suspicion that it deserves, and are constantly trying to read between the lines, see the wood from the trees, and avoid all the traps..... ......would be a demographic who were particularly sceptical of governmental (and Big Pharma) intentions...
Well said!
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,422
  • Dec 13, 2021 9:38am Dec 13, 2021 9:38am
Quoting Mcbeaners
trading aussie today, signals are all pretty much pointing one way.
Which way would that be and why?

I am currently eyeing up a range revesal in the AUDUSD.....don't have my signla yet (15minute chart), but am watching closely.
  • #1,206,423
  • Dec 13, 2021 9:56am Dec 13, 2021 9:56am
Quoting MatDerKater
{quote} Which way would that be and why? I am currently eyeing up a range revesal in the AUDUSD.....don't have my signla yet (15minute chart), but am watching closely.
over all trend is down, based on ma's, price and cd. there should be a retrace here for 1 or 2 h1 candles. then service downward should resume.
In tea leaves we trust!
  • #1,206,424
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:00am Dec 13, 2021 10:00am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} You have an obsession with this moving average thing, we get your point. Actually, a retraction does not take >1 year, it is because the pressure to go along was put in place. At the time of printing restrictions were being removed. Again, this subject matter investigation was not novel, there have been numerous studies for more than 20 years discussing this topic of mask wearing. Most of them came to the conclusion that it does not prevent but it may be a good idea. That conclusion is opinion, not science.
Just go to RetractionWatch. There is now a page listing >100 publications retracted related to COVID, many of them published in 2020 and retracted recently, >1 year. A very good place for skeptics to visit for new idea of “hidden agenda”.

You don’t need to question me, the fact is there on all the materials I shared. I also haven’t specifically referring to you, in fact, not even anyone, when I use the examples for laymen to relate the absurdity of misconceptions.

Science is ever changing, so maybe you are correct masks cannot prevent infection at the end. But current studies is that majority pointing it, as an PPE, can. The social studies failed with a remark in their conclusions, usually, mention actual usage. Literally all scientific and medical “gold standards” and decisions are based on the statistics of scientific findings. However an org or gov choose to make their decisions may become opinions.
  • #1,206,425
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:04am Dec 13, 2021 10:04am
Quoting Mcbeaners
{quote} over all trend is down, based on ma's, price and cd. there should be a retrace here for 1 or 2 h1 candles. then service downward should resume.
Ok, I see:
-price having rinsed a bunch of logical pivots chasing bounce momentum.
-a 'suckers' M top against a previous Daily S&D zone (behind which every retail AUDUSD trader and his dog will have their SL.
- a Daily timeframe S3 hit, laminating with a 38.2% bounce retrace, and a 1.27% Extension from the move down from the top.
- PRice is retesting a 4Hr S&D zone, which offered little resistance on the bounce up.
-I have clean potential divergence forming on the 15 minute, as soon as I get a solid close on that time frame, within my 5 ema bands, I will take action.

https://www.tradingview.com/x/TiKweFXN/
  • #1,206,426
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:08am Dec 13, 2021 10:08am
Names & Faces.

https://www.algora.com/Algora_blog/2...ames-and-faces
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,427
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:10am Dec 13, 2021 10:10am
Quoting MatDerKater
{quote} What is going down wrt to Covid19 and all the preposterously disproportionate yet very dangerous precedents that are being set, is so patently obvious, that it stuns me that so many can't see it. I would have thought that traders especially, who are accustomed to treating 'news' with the contempt and suspicion that it deserves, and are constantly trying to read between the lines, see the wood from the trees, and avoid all the traps..... ......would be a demographic who were particularly sceptical of governmental (and Big Pharma) intentions...
I agree with you and also myself am skeptical to things happening in COVID. Mostly because of disbelief to governments and sort. It is more on political side of it.

But I see people here are too over with it sometimes, the suspicions is based on a complete misconception.

Some hidden agenda with vaccine? Who knows. But US patent priority date’s definition has not changed because of the pandemic.

And not to mentioned the number of publications supporting current recommended practices can prevent pandemic, are also retracted in the last 2 years. But I get that when we are skeptical we focus a lot more on those favours our opinion.
  • #1,206,428
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:30am Dec 13, 2021 10:30am
Quoting tommydoginti
{quote} I agree with you and also myself am skeptical to things happening in COVID. Mostly because of disbelief to governments and sort. It is more on political side of it. But I see people here are too over with it sometimes, the suspicions is based on a complete misconception. Some hidden agenda with vaccine? Who knows. But US patent priority date’s definition has not changed because of the pandemic. And not to mentioned the number of publications supporting current recommended practices can prevent pandemic, are also retracted in the last 2 years....
I told people at the very start of this, that this was all about forced vaccinations and using them to justify a digital ID system.

I got ridiculed for that to begin with, but time has proven that as a 'good call'.

So I shall continue to trust my own personal measure on what is going on with C19, beyond all the noise that is out there.

.....as with many good trades, there is always a ton of noise and counter theses which could throw you off the scent, but being right will always be being right.
  • #1,206,429
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:35am Dec 13, 2021 10:35am
Quoting tommydoginti
{quote} Just go to RetractionWatch. There is now a page listing >100 publications retracted related to COVID, many of them published in 2020 and retracted recently, >1 year. A very good place for skeptics to visit for new idea of “hidden agenda”. You don’t need to question me, the fact is there on all the materials I shared. I also haven’t specifically referring to you, in fact, not even anyone, when I use the examples for laymen to relate the absurdity of misconceptions. Science is ever changing, so maybe you are correct masks cannot...
There is now a page listing >100 publications retracted related to COVID, many of them published in 2020 and retracted recently, >1 year.

You really don't think that is suspicious, given that the conclusions have not changed?
Covid and mask studies have been going on for more than 20 years. The science behind the ability of a mask to prevent a particle smaller than the pores on the mask from passing through is not ever changing.
There is no need to discard common sense in this regard.

I use the examples for laymen to relate the absurdity of misconceptions.

Your comparison that the moving average and transferring professional information is valid, but your connection that the conclusions of the laymen are "absurd" is a step beyond insulting. We are not just drawing our conclusions from common sense, they are backed by professional medical specialists, that have actually treated thousands of patients and came away with different conclusions based on their verifiable results.

Are you a doctor or virologist? Have you treated any patients for covid? What makes your opinion better than those who have and are saying the opposite of what you are?

The people that disagree with you and are posting material here, are just relaying information that has been presented by VERIFIED medical professionals. Information they present have been censored on main stream media, not because it has been dis proven.
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,430
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:42am Dec 13, 2021 10:42am
Quoting MatDerKater
{quote} I told people at the very start of this, that this was all about forced vaccinations and using them to justify a digital ID system. I got ridiculed for that to begin with, but time has proven that as a 'good call'. So I shall continue to trust my own personal measure on what is going on with C19, beyond all the noise that is out there. .....as with many good trades, there is always a ton of noise and counter theses which could throw you off the scent, but being right will always be being right.
Can’t agree with you more, what is being right will always be right.

You have some thoughts about political decision. TBH I don’t want to make any comment on that.

since the beginning my conversation is to focus on the facts. Fact of definitions, terms, and statistics, and the opposite of it: misconceptions. Not really care for personal opinions. One can like or hate using Moving Average it is up to him, but it does not change the nature of MA and something he should understand before making preferences.
  • #1,206,431
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:46am Dec 13, 2021 10:46am
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 176 KB

DOW Hourly. --- this is called Terminal Overthrow . . . .

  • #1,206,432
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:55am Dec 13, 2021 10:55am
By the looks of it this consolidation may not end this week either.
  • #1,206,433
  • Dec 13, 2021 10:58am Dec 13, 2021 10:58am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} There is now a page listing >100 publications retracted related to COVID, many of them published in 2020 and retracted recently, >1 year. You really don't think that is suspicious, given that the conclusions have not changed? Covid and mask studies have been going on for more than 20 years. The science behind the ability of a mask to prevent a particle smaller than the pores on the mask from passing through is not ever changing. There is no need to discard common sense in this regard. I use the examples for laymen to relate the absurdity...
Yes I work in the field of Biotech/BioPharma. In my postgrad days I used both nanoparticle “biolistic transfection” and Liposome (eg Lipofactamine 3000) to transfect cell, mouse and rabbit with mRNA and plasmid, hence I know the cost and the mechanism of dosing a mRNA shot. My professor’s lab was one of the many labs attempted to reproduce Obakata’s STAP cell experiment and published a paper, so I feel the difficulty and time to disprove another research
I work in company selling Dx things, one being COVID detection kits. A few advantages I have over others: we visit hospitals and doctors (and learn what they know), during sales cycle we have access to actual patient data (blinded confidential info).

finally, no. Clinicians who treat patients in hospitals conduct CASE studies. M.D. have labs with scientific researchers who do not treat patients. They are mostly faculty members. The other labs in hospitals would be led by a departmental consultant doctor and a couple SO with MLT, who also don’t treat patients. The research you referred are done by non-patient-treating people and labs. Something you should know as a global system.

Doctors (treating patients) and MD (Medical Doctor) are two very different titles with separate JD. basicallly one is Bachelor, and the other one at PhD level.
  • #1,206,434
  • Dec 13, 2021 11:03am Dec 13, 2021 11:03am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} There is now a page listing >100 publications retracted related to COVID, many of them published in 2020 and retracted recently, >1 year. You really don't think that is suspicious, given that the conclusions have not changed? Covid and mask studies have been going on for more than 20 years. The science behind the ability of a mask to prevent a particle smaller than the pores on the mask from passing through is not ever changing. There is no need to discard common sense in this regard. I use the examples for laymen to relate the absurdity...

I think when you see a new trader keep yelling Moving Average is moving even after you explained and refuses to read what you suggest to him, as an experienced trader like you, maybe you can suggest a better approach to not offence the newbie but show you do know more than he does.
  • #1,206,435
  • Dec 13, 2021 11:05am Dec 13, 2021 11:05am
The whole thread turned into a FAQ thread about vaccination rather than EURUSD.

If it's about Forex, post it. Like you can post news and views about UK Lockdown in GBPUSD thread. But if we are only going to argue about if vaccinations are a necessity or not, save it for the weekend.

And for those who are going to ask if i am the content police, yes i can become one by reporting you.

Let's just stick to EURUSD, and don't forget to get vaccinated at least 2 times (preferably Pfizer-Biontech) for not only you but for the whole community
You have to have an IQ higher than 90 to interact with this user.
  • #1,206,436
  • Dec 13, 2021 11:10am Dec 13, 2021 11:10am
Quoting Nordling00
The whole thread turned into a FAQ thread about vaccination rather than EURUSD. If it's about Forex, post it. Like you can post news and views about UK Lockdown in GBPUSD thread. But if we are only going to argue about if vaccinations are a necessity or not, save it for the weekend. And for those who are going to ask if i am the content police, yes i can become one by reporting you. Let's just stick to EURUSD, and don't forget to get vaccinated at least 2 times (preferably Pfizer-Biontech) for not only you but for the whole community
Agreed. Doesn't matter what conspiracy theorist say, that is all they are and they have no clue about science.

But we should stick to trading, and share technical and fundamental analysis. This FAQ is stretching too long and there is no point to it, because we are trading here EURUSD and other pairs. Trade safe.
  • #1,206,437
  • Dec 13, 2021 11:23am Dec 13, 2021 11:23am
we go to R1, R2
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: df.jpg Size: 300 KB
Trendlines H1,H4, SMC
  • #1,206,438
  • Dec 13, 2021 11:29am Dec 13, 2021 11:29am
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 161 KB

I exited shorts , earlier today at 1. 12 93 and entered 2 longs , as shown. SL now at 96

I am not certain how far this upmove will last ... We ll see.
  • #1,206,439
  • Dec 13, 2021 11:32am Dec 13, 2021 11:32am
Quoting MatDerKater
{quote} Ok, I see: -price having rinsed a bunch of logical pivots chasing bounce momentum. -a 'suckers' M top against a previous Daily S&D zone (behind which every retail AUDUSD trader and his dog will have their SL. - a Daily timeframe S3 hit, laminating with a 38.2% bounce retrace, and a 1.27% Extension from the move down from the top. - PRice is retesting a 4Hr S&D zone, which offered little resistance on the bounce up. -I have clean potential divergence forming on the 15 minute, as soon as I get a solid close on that time frame, within my 5...
i don't think it will retrace back to your M but something like 71442 ish. at least i won't be hold my long past that and more inclined to step out before then. its quiet bearish.
In tea leaves we trust!
  • #1,206,440
  • Dec 13, 2021 11:38am Dec 13, 2021 11:38am
Quoting tommydoginti
{quote} Yes I work in the field of Biotech/BioPharma. In my postgrad days I used both nanoparticle “biolistic transfection” and Liposome (eg Lipofactamine 3000) to transfect cell, mouse and rabbit with mRNA and plasmid, hence I know the cost and the mechanism of dosing a mRNA shot. My professor’s lab was one of the many labs attempted to reproduce Obakata’s STAP cell experiment and published a paper, so I feel the difficulty and time to disprove another research I work in company selling Dx things, one being COVID detection kits. A few advantages...
So no you are not a doctor that treats patients.
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
1,811 traders viewing now