EURUSD | Page 60315 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CHF

Similar Threads

MT4: how to change "EURUSD" to "#EURUSD"? 3 replies

Re: EurUsd short term 15 replies

did oanda just drop its spread for eurusd to 1 pip? 11 replies

EA for multiple lot limit order for EURUSD 0 replies

NFP nice bump up on EURUSD 2 replies

Attachments: EURUSD
Exit Attachments

EURUSD

  • #1,206,281
  • Dec 11, 2021 3:27am Dec 11, 2021 3:27am
USD: Doubts The Fed Will Be Able To Exceed The Already Hawkish Market Expectations Next Week - Credit Agricole

Credit Agricole CIB Research discusses its expectations for next week's FOMC policy meeting.

"Ahead of its December policy meeting, we expect the Fed to signal a faster pace of QE taper while the updated ‘dot plot’ could signal rate hikes starting in 2022. That being said, we further note that the US rates markets are already pricing in around three rate hikes in 2022, followed by another two in 2023. We, therefore, doubt that the Fed will be able to exceed the already hawkish market expectations," CACIB notes.

"We nevertheless maintain a contrastive outlook on the currency because we think that it can benefit from the further recovery in UST yields on the back of recovering economic optimism, a more aggressive QE taper, and a potential extension of the US debt ceiling," CACIB adds.
  • #1,206,282
  • Dec 11, 2021 5:24am Dec 11, 2021 5:24am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} It is not a vaccine patent but a covid19 testing patent. It has to do with oxigen in your blood. Graphene oxide will eat up your blood oxigen. If you are not an adverse reactor it takes 3 to 10 years to loose your blood oxigen(most people 3 years) Look up wewstern population by 2025 if you can find a database. Look up western & Asian countries https://archive.md/nAHJK (CIA, FBI and otther similar institutions sources) way back, i am starting to think a lot of people have a crystal ball.So when you test you will see you are fucked...
Man , your input is valuable . I spread. Thanks.
  • #1,206,283
  • Dec 11, 2021 9:48am Dec 11, 2021 9:48am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} It is not a vaccine patent but a covid19 testing patent. It has to do with oxigen in your blood. Graphene oxide will eat up your blood oxigen. If you are not an adverse reactor it takes 3 to 10 years to loose your blood oxigen(most people 3 years) Look up wewstern population by 2025 if you can find a database. Look up western & Asian countries https://archive.md/nAHJK (CIA, FBI and otther similar institutions sources) way back, i am starting to think a lot of people have a crystal ball.So when you test you will see you are fucked...

Wait so you don’t think an official patent document and guideline of US patent application “an official documentation”?

interesting because a patent application is reviewed by peer in field, US Lego and lawyers for it to be registered and able to viewed by public.

I wish the vaccine delivery system is based on graphene oxide because liposome is more cytotoxic than it. If it is indeed infused with graphene oxide I would be glad, but the current technology is graphene oxide is too small to encapsulate sizeable mRNA molecules.

and I think that is another topic besides the priority date misconception
  • #1,206,284
  • Dec 11, 2021 9:58am Dec 11, 2021 9:58am
Dr. Byram Bridle: Viral Immunologist Debunks Mask Protect People From Covid

https://rumble.com/vqkhaq-dr.-byram-...rom-covid.html
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,285
  • Edited 10:15am Dec 11, 2021 10:05am | Edited 10:15am
Quoting tonyb123
Dr. Byram Bridle: Viral Immunologist Debunks Mask Protect People From Covid https://rumble.com/vqkhaq-dr.-byram-...rom-covid.html
that is why masks has ASTM and other scales of quality assessment.

I agree with Dr Bryam, because he tested low cost masks and cloth masks. With the pores of >80um it is impossible for them to pass any current mask tests. I hope he tries some certified masks like N95

But I don’t agree on his test. His test is not aerosol. It’s CONDENSATION. Blowing breath on a cool object would condense vaporised moisture in your breath, it’s common sense if you have been to any cool places.
It has to be either a spray or solid particle as of the tests.

Official guideline on ASTM mask qualification.
https://primed.com/resources/astm-ma...ion-standards/

Study on mask prevent aerosol, one major source of spreading of COVID and any other respiratory diseases

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32973285/

This study of TB in aerosol (same transmission route as COVID and common flu). Highlights of it include actual statistics of aerosol size
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29355225/


Damn it’s like working my job on weekend

Take home message: use a proper mask that is certified and from a reputable brand
  • #1,206,286
  • Dec 11, 2021 10:13am Dec 11, 2021 10:13am
Quoting tommydoginti
{quote} that is why masks has ASTM and other scales of quality assessment. Study on mask prevent aerosol, one major source of spreading of COVID and any other respiratory diseases https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32973285/ This study of TB in aerosol (same transmission route as COVID and common flu). Highlights of it include actual statistics of aerosol size https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29355225/ Damn it’s like working my job on weekend
Did you actually read the article? Here is an excerpt:

"Both surgical masks and unvented KN95 respirators, even without fit-testing, reduce the outward particle emission rates by 90% and 74% on average during speaking and coughing, respectively, compared to wearing no mask, corroborating their effectiveness at reducing outward emission."

Aside from them only reducing transmission, there is a gulf of distance between 90% and 74%. And it in no way counters the information provided in the video, if that was your objective.

As for the source NIH I would expect nothing less as to the inference of the information.

In the line of your KFC example; "I would not hire a fox to guard the hen house."
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,287
  • Dec 11, 2021 10:21am Dec 11, 2021 10:21am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} Did you actually read the article? Here is an excerpt: "Both surgical masks and unvented KN95 respirators, even without fit-testing, reduce the outward particle emission rates by 90% and 74% on average during speaking and coughing, respectively, compared to wearing no mask, corroborating their effectiveness at reducing outward emission." Aside from them only reducing transmission, there is a gulf of distance between 90% and 74%. And it in no way counters the information provided in the video, if that was your objective. As for the source...

Blowing warm moist breath through anything besides a dehumifier and onto a cool object would definitely create moisture. It is not how the ASTM test is done it has guideline so the NIH one would be best to rea

Do a test urself as done in the video: blow through a mask AND without a mask. See how much condensation on the glass. There is no need to question why not try it out and prove it yourself. Best way no need to believe anyone but yourself

Wow it is now like explaining to a trading newbie why the Japanese candlestick chart of GBP/USD has nothing to do with JPY, or why moving average is not moving on the chart...
  • #1,206,288
  • Dec 11, 2021 10:40am Dec 11, 2021 10:40am
Quoting tommydoginti
{quote} Blowing warm moist breath through anything besides a dehumifier and onto a cool object would definitely create moisture. It is not how the ASTM test is done it has guideline so the NIH one would be best to read Wow it is now like explaining to a trading newbie why the Japanese candlestick chart of GBP/USD has nothing to do with JPY, or why moving average is not moving on the chart...
It would also show that a virus particulate, which is smaller than the particulate from spittle can and does pass through a mask and even 5 masks with 15 layers. Even your approved resource stipulates that.
Would you like to see a video of a painter wear a respirator and take it off and his nose filled with paint? I have that as well.

LOL, I can see you and I are going to be good friends. I love the sarcastic and arrogant people that think they are smarter than everyone.
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,289
  • Dec 11, 2021 10:50am Dec 11, 2021 10:50am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} It would also show that a virus particulate, which is smaller than the particulate from spittle can and does pass through a mask and even 5 masks with 15 layers. Even your approved resource stipulates that. Would you like to see a video of a painter wear a respirator and take it off and his nose filled with paint? I have that as well. LOL, I can see you and I are going to be good friends. I love the sarcastic and arrogant people that think they are smarter than everyone.

Yes I think you have read the guidelines on mask QC.


Now, instead of breathing out, talk and cough through the mask and without the mask for 3 minutes with the glasses in front of your mouth.

then you count the number of saliva marks on it in two conditions. That is the actual aerosol.

in actual ASTM test it is not a glass but a spectrometer to count.

COVID is not airborne but rely on aerosol. We should thank god it is not airborne or we as the whole population probably all have got it by now.
Virus particle is permanently inactivated (dead) as its free form so it almost always need a liquid medium, such as HIV (bodily fluid), HBV (Moise food and ingestion), Flu and COVID (saliva and respiratory fluid). Hence it is not a concern (thank god again) of it being in its free form.
  • #1,206,290
  • Dec 11, 2021 10:53am Dec 11, 2021 10:53am
Quoting tommydoginti
{quote} Yes I think you have read the guidelines on mask QC. Now, instead of breathing out, talk and cough through the mask and without the mask for 3 minutes with the glasses in front of your mouth. then you count the number of saliva marks on it in two conditions. That is the actual aerosol. in actual ASTM test it is not a glass but a spectrometer to count. COVID is not airborne but rely on aerosol. We should thank god it is not airborne or we as the whole population probably all have got it by now. Virus particle is permanently inactivated (dead)...

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Untitled.png Size: 607 KB
So this is false?
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,291
  • Dec 11, 2021 10:55am Dec 11, 2021 10:55am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} It would also show that a virus particulate, which is smaller than the particulate from spittle can and does pass through a mask and even 5 masks with 15 layers. Even your approved resource stipulates that. Would you like to see a video of a painter wear a respirator and take it off and his nose filled with paint? I have that as well. LOL, I can see you and I are going to be good friends. I love the sarcastic and arrogant people that think they are smarter than everyone.

I try not to be sarcastic, but just like a newbie trader keep pressing you why moving average is not moving and you explain for multiple time that the “moving” has nothing to do with actual movement. You either explain in more blunt but relatable examples, or simply call him idiot.

I try to be former but I know on FF most would just go straight to later.
  • #1,206,292
  • Dec 11, 2021 10:59am Dec 11, 2021 10:59am
Quoting tommydoginti
{quote} I try not to be sarcastic, but just like a newbie trader keep pressing you why moving average is not moving and you explain for multiple time that the “moving” has nothing to do with actual movement. You either explain in more blunt but relatable examples, or simply call him idiot. I try to be former but I know on FF most would just go straight to later.
I am not that guy, and If you do some investigation of the abrasive interactions I have had with some individuals, I always allow someone to explain their point of view. Until, they resort to insults or throw common sense out the window and begin to dodge and obfuscate.
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,293
  • Dec 11, 2021 11:01am Dec 11, 2021 11:01am
Viruses are afloat all over the place. They are lighter than skoke . They land on your hair , skin , clothes , objects you ll touch .

  • #1,206,294
  • Dec 11, 2021 11:09am Dec 11, 2021 11:09am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} {image}So this is false?
Hi regarding your reference article, its claim not not significant has referred to citation 9,10 and 33.

if you go to the three articles and go to conclusion, they do mention a reduction of infection using masks and or hand hygiene. The insignificant comes from the p value and small scale, like 22 individual.

On the other hand the paper you referred mentioned another 7 studies that concluded with significant reduction of infection.

just like trading we go for high probability patterns, the study, although a not significant (>5% chance face mask DOES NOT have effect), that the odds of face mask can help is higher. Unless you can prove oyherwise
  • #1,206,295
  • Dec 11, 2021 11:09am Dec 11, 2021 11:09am
Quoting F.g
Viruses are afloat all over the place. They are lighter than skoke . They land on your hair , skin , clothes , objects you ll touch .
Yes but they are “dead” in short period of dryness. We have HBV all over the place but we don’t get it unless you are eating something wet, where the HBV is in a moist environment from the host patient to inside you
  • #1,206,296
  • Dec 11, 2021 11:11am Dec 11, 2021 11:11am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} I am not that guy, and If you do some investigation of the abrasive interactions I have had with some individuals, I always allow someone to explain their point of view. Until, they resort to insults or throw common sense out the window and begin to dodge and obfuscate.
No not doing that and hope you wont

but welcome to ask about COVID and I will try my best to share my knowledge. After all, I work in a company selling the test kits for it.

I do hope the pandemic can end ASAP by clearing some misconceptions. At the end it is your choice to believe it or not but hopefully at least an informed decision
  • #1,206,297
  • Dec 11, 2021 11:28am Dec 11, 2021 11:28am
https://www.fxstreet.com/analysis/eu...s-202112101524 Euro USD will rock next week
  • #1,206,298
  • Dec 11, 2021 11:31am Dec 11, 2021 11:31am
Quoting tommydoginti
{quote} Hi regarding your reference article, its claim not not significant has referred to citation 9,10 and 33. if you go to the three articles and go to conclusion, they do mention a reduction of infection using masks and or hand hygiene. The insignificant comes from the p value and small scale, like 22 individual. On the other hand the paper you referred mentioned another 7 studies that concluded with significant reduction of infection. just like trading we go for high probability patterns, the study, although a not significant (>5% chance face...
Here is the article: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article

Here is the rest of the paragraph cut out of the picture;

One study evaluated the use of masks among pilgrims from Australia during the Hajj pilgrimage and reported no major difference in the risk for laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in the control or mask group (33). Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by monitoring the incidence of laboratory-confirmed influenza among student hall residents for 5 months (9,10). The overall reduction in ILI or laboratory-confirmed influenza cases in the face mask group was not significant in either studies (9,10). Study designs in the 7 household studies were slightly different: 1 study provided face masks and P2 respirators for household contacts only (34), another study evaluated face mask use as a source control for infected persons only (35), and the remaining studies provided masks for the infected persons as well as their close contacts (11–13,15,17). None of the household studies reported a significant reduction in secondary laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infections in the face mask group (11–13,15,17,34,35). Most studies were underpowered because of limited sample size, and some studies also reported suboptimal adherence in the face mask group.
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,299
  • Edited 11:47am Dec 11, 2021 11:36am | Edited 11:47am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} Here is the article: https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994_article Here is the rest of the paragraph cut out of the picture; One study evaluated the use of masks among pilgrims from Australia during the Hajj pilgrimage and reported no major difference in the risk for laboratory-confirmed influenza virus infection in the control or mask group (33). Two studies in university settings assessed the effectiveness of face masks for primary protection by...

please go and read the actual articles of reference 33,9,10, for instance

it is a very good point, because it said
”Most studies were underpowered because of limited sample size, and some studies also reported suboptimal adherence in the face mask group.”

the main drawback of too small for effective sample size is insignificance of statistics

* also it is complicated, as mentioned in the article, by the suboptimal adherence. Many of the references are community studies and researchers had little control over how exactly or whether really did the subjects did what was told to do.
In contrast of a controlled environment test, like the TB paper I referred and clinical trials, where the behaviours are monitored.
Some studies referred are more like “how good is a person’s hygiene habit” + “how good is a face mask” study, esp the student dorm one

On the other hand, the number of publications on analytical performance of masks to prevent aerosol spreading is also sizeable. Feel free to look up them by searching “face mask aerosol pubmed”. One of them was shared in my previous posts.

some supports a good barrier and also a minority against. It’s science and always no solid yes or no. Just combined with the nature of viral transmission, the oddes is on the “yes” side
  • #1,206,300
  • Dec 11, 2021 11:39am Dec 11, 2021 11:39am
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 264575004_205494308408748_6339671553643499227_n.jpg Size: 11 KB
Founder of Sutherland Wave Principle
368 traders viewing now, 2 are registered:
brandon12127
,
fmtrad3r