EURUSD | Page 60311 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

EUR/USD, GBP/USD, USD/CHF

Similar Threads

MT4: how to change "EURUSD" to "#EURUSD"? 3 replies

Re: EurUsd short term 15 replies

did oanda just drop its spread for eurusd to 1 pip? 11 replies

EA for multiple lot limit order for EURUSD 0 replies

NFP nice bump up on EURUSD 2 replies

Attachments: EURUSD
Exit Attachments

EURUSD

  • #1,206,201
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:17am Dec 10, 2021 10:17am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} I too use fundamentals
So why are you selling AUDJPY if you are using fundamentals?
  • #1,206,202
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:19am Dec 10, 2021 10:19am
Quoting Techanalyst
{quote} So why are you selling AUDJPY if you are using fundamentals?
You will know once i close my trades
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,203
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:19am Dec 10, 2021 10:19am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} You will know once i close my trades
No, that is not how macro trading works. AUDJPY is bullish fundamentally, if you are selling, than you are just using technical analysis, on lower time frames. Nothing to do with fundamentals.
  • #1,206,204
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:21am Dec 10, 2021 10:21am
Quoting Techanalyst
{quote} So why are you selling AUDJPY if you are using fundamentals?
My question again is why is it that you know i do not hold positions?
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,205
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:22am Dec 10, 2021 10:22am
Quoting Techanalyst
{quote} So he invented his own work, and later on says that it is not reliable and could make virus worse? Bunch of nonsense. And the answer is NO, he is not allowed to speak about it. Because he made false claims. So either his work was stolen and someone got rich off of it, or he did not get the amount of money for his invention, and someone else took the credit for it and now he is pissed, which in this case he has right to be. But he made false claims and no evidence that the vaccine is making virus worst.
The only evidence...
So he invented his own work, and later on says that it is not reliable and could make virus worse?
That does not make it nonsense. The technology usage is different than application usage, the technology is good or your gov hacks would not be using. He did not slam the technology, just the way it is being used and on whom it is being used.

But he made false claims and no evidence that the vaccine is making virus worst.
Nobody is claiming that, the claims are, that it is causing adverse reactions in people, like death and other serious illnesses. There is a difference.

The only evidence so far is that vaccine proved to be good and helping fighting this virus.
It is so good that they had to rewrite the definition of vaccine. You are gullible Gilligan, shipwrecked in the land of stupid.
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
  • #1,206,206
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:23am Dec 10, 2021 10:23am
Quoting Techanalyst
{quote} No, that is not how macro trading works. AUDJPY is bullish fundamentally, if you are selling, than you are just using technical analysis, on lower time frames. Nothing to do with fundamentals.
Yes i am fundamentally technical just as you are technically fundamental
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,207
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:24am Dec 10, 2021 10:24am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} My question again is why is it that you know i do not hold positions?
I do not know if you hold or not, the debate is about you saying you are using fundamentals, but you are selling AUDJPY on lower time frames. So you are not using fundamentals at least not for this pair. Because this pair is bullish due to AUD fundamentals much stronger then JPY. The strength divergence is very strong, so it is clearly bullish. Interest rates ofr AUD are better then JPY. So in this case you have sold AUDJPY strictly based on technical analysis on lower time frames. That's it.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: AUDJPY_2021-12-10_11-21-16.png Size: 48 KB
  • #1,206,208
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:25am Dec 10, 2021 10:25am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} So he invented his own work, and later on says that it is not reliable and could make virus worse? That does not make it nonsense. The technology usage is different than application usage, the technology is good or your gov hacks would not be using. He did not slam the technology, just the way it is being used and on whom it is being used. But he made false claims and no evidence that the vaccine is making virus worst. Nobody is claiming that, the claims are, that it is causing adverse reactions in people, like death and other serious illnesses....
Majority of people have responded well to the vaccine. That is that. Anything else is just stretching the pointless conversation. Until you come up with a solid evidence that vaccine has killed 5 million + people like covid did, than will talk, until than you have no reliable sources, and you are just stretching conspiracy theories with no backed up evidence. Back to trading.
  • #1,206,209
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:26am Dec 10, 2021 10:26am
Quoting Techanalyst
{quote} If you can hold buy position all the way to 1.11 even lower go for it. But we all know you don't.
the debate is this
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,210
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:27am Dec 10, 2021 10:27am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} Yes i am fundamentally technical just as you are technically fundamental
You are not fundamental trader.
  • #1,206,211
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:28am Dec 10, 2021 10:28am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} the debate is this
Ok so hold it than.
  • #1,206,212
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:28am Dec 10, 2021 10:28am
Quoting Techanalyst
{quote} You are not fundamental trader.
and you are not a technical trader
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,213
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:29am Dec 10, 2021 10:29am
time for a coffee
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,214
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:30am Dec 10, 2021 10:30am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} and you are not a technical trader
Definitely not, I analyse the macro trading and fundamentals. Technicals are just there to enter either buy or sell. I do not gamble I trade and invest.
  • #1,206,215
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:31am Dec 10, 2021 10:31am
Quoting tonyb123
{quote} So he invented his own work, and later on says that it is not reliable and could make virus worse? That does not make it nonsense. The technology usage is different than application usage, the technology is good or your gov hacks would not be using. He did not slam the technology, just the way it is being used and on whom it is being used. But he made false claims and no evidence that the vaccine is making virus worst. Nobody is claiming that, the claims are, that it is causing adverse reactions in people, like death and other serious illnesses....
..... Shipwrecked in the land of stupid . Epic.
  • #1,206,216
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:32am Dec 10, 2021 10:32am
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Captura de pantalla (2649)_LI.jpg Size: 774 KB
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,217
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:33am Dec 10, 2021 10:33am
Quoting Techanalyst
{quote} Definitely not, I analyse the macro trading and fundamentals. Technicals are just there to enter either buy or sell. I do not gamble I trade and invest.
Short the dow to 26000. Thats an investment
POSTMASTER
  • #1,206,218
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:34am Dec 10, 2021 10:34am
all longs
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: EURUSD_stpH4.png Size: 49 KB
  • #1,206,219
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:37am Dec 10, 2021 10:37am
Quoting Robinhood1
{quote} Short the dow to 26000. Thats an investment
, no that is a disaster. Short the DOW really... I don't think so.

But if you are into stocks, try GLBE global e online. Very good company, good results, I have bought it already and holding it for a long time.
  • #1,206,220
  • Dec 10, 2021 10:52am Dec 10, 2021 10:52am
Quoting Techanalyst
{quote} Majority of people have responded well to the vaccine. That is that. Anything else is just stretching the pointless conversation. Until you come up with a solid evidence that vaccine has killed 5 million + people like covid did, than will talk, until than you have no reliable sources, and you are just stretching conspiracy theories with no backed up evidence. Back to trading.
Do you understand that pre covid vaccines were tested long term to determine adverse reactions over the period of years?
You have no such data for this shot.
In the short period of distribution, it has had more adverse injuries than all vaccines put together for a 70 year period.
Given the amount and severity of the reactions reported already, the statistics do not look good at all.
On top of that, the consensus of dr's, is that there is actually, under reporting of injuries. These are statistical facts from your approved gov, reliable sources.
MY GRID. Markets are NOT random.
2,335 traders viewing now