Disliked{quote} They don't NEED to have a large edge, and in fact that would work against them. Who the fuck wants to play a game they intuitively see/feel/know they can never possibly beat?Ignored
1
I think Oanda FXTrade is unreliable 507 replies
List of unreliable brokers (updated once a week) 50 replies
NordFX stop hunting, unreliable with quotes 4 replies
Unreliable demo server 8 replies
Disliked{quote} They don't NEED to have a large edge, and in fact that would work against them. Who the fuck wants to play a game they intuitively see/feel/know they can never possibly beat?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Exactly. But if 2+2=17.76 or/and stochastic show oversold areas then your rock must jump to the moon instead of falling to the ground. So where I'm wrong? That 2+2=4, but not >17? That RSI/stoch are not showing oversold areas? That your support and resistance levels with no volume data used are pure bullshit? That repainting indicators are only good to sell mentoring on youtube? Where my mistake exactly?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Your mistake is that before you dont know how to use volume data you claim that you are succeful in trading with indicators, now you use volume,and say that indicators is bullshit. Its same like 2+2=17Ignored
Disliked{quote} I'm terribly sorry, but it is not. Moving average shows average price for X candles back using smoothness if you wish. It is not lagging. It is like to say that average speed of your car slow you down that's why you are not so good like formula 1 drivers. Look at Ronaldo. He trains every day, which is why he is one of the best footballers. But he use the same shoes and the same ball. Not unique special one. As so me the problem is that we are digging the wrong hole. Better ask yourself why there are no volume data on forex? Why they are...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I'm terribly sorry, but it is not. Moving average shows average price for X candles back using smoothness if you wish. It is not lagging. It is like to say that average speed of your car slow you down that's why you are not so good like formula 1 drivers. Look at Ronaldo. He trains every day, which is why he is one of the best footballers. But he use the same shoes and the same ball. Not unique special one. As so me the problem is that we are digging the wrong hole. Better ask yourself why there are no volume data on forex? Why they are...Ignored
Disliked{quote} If there is same move in every exchange. Then logicaly we cant relay on this broker volume.for example if price is same then volume is same then broker copy volume from other provider and dont show his real volumeIgnored
Disliked{quote} Reading this shit hurts my brain. Are you actually this fucking stupid? Do you understand the basics of what the forex market is, and who trades on it? If you did most of the dribble you wrote would all be answered for you. There's no mystery, just ignorant people. {quote} More garbage. Where exactly do you expect to get this magical volume data from? Do you even know what "volume" represents in your trading platform. I'm getting a strong hint that you wouldn't have a clue. Where should this "real volume" be coming from? If you can answer...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I jus dont understand why price on chart on two brokers are same but volumes are differentIgnored
Disliked{quote} I jus dont understand why price on chart on two brokers are same but volumes are differentIgnored
Disliked{quote} Reading this shit hurts my brain. Are you actually this fucking stupid? ... You two are talking shit back and forth to each other... it's adorable.Ignored
Disliked{quote}... tell me that and maybe, maybe, you'll lead yourself into a discussion worth your time, instead of knucklefucking other noobs in a circle jerk of pointless musings.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Chart or pricing is mostly the same because all major participants mostly look at the same price. It used to be EBS that was the main central order limit book but nowadays I am not sure. Its probably the aggregation of public ecn like fxall, ebs, reuters matching, hotspot etc and on top of that single bank platforms. Arbitrage is why almost all the pricing would mostly be the same. Most major participants would be connected to the major venues. As for retail traders, we are subject to the broker that we use. Volume wise it is very different...Ignored
DislikedI haven't done a study myself (I don't have access to FX volume data) but I'm inclined to believe that Caspar Marney and his study are legitimate...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Reading this shit hurts my brain. Are you actually this fucking stupid?Ignored
Disliked{quote} ============================================================================== From @TraderinSD's post from 2011: https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...31#post7170531 "“Tick volume” measures the number of times the price ticks up and down. This is an excellent indicator of the strength of activity in any given bar. But also, the correlation between tick volume and actual volume traded is incredibly high. In 2011, Caspar Marney, head of Marney Capital and ex-UBS and HSBC trader, conducted an analysis of actual volume and...Ignored
DislikedFirst off I have been where you are and thought being profitable in this game is impossible but it definitely isn't it takes time dedication and a lot of hours of backtesting I must have tested hundreds if not thousands of indicators and systems and backtested things manually thousands of times but what it all boils down to is how consistent can you be and trade the same pairs at the same time of day taking the same setups if available and implementing great risk management nobody really knows where the market is going. Having a system profitable...Ignored
Disliked@here2there -- I just now came across a post of yours from last month where you also commented about tick-volume vs FX volume: ================================================= Your quote: "I responded to you because you appear to be giving people the impression tick volume is far from being accurate in comparison to real volume. But the truth is, it's not far off from real volume. It seems you have been made to feel you need to purchase real volume in order to have an edge. But that is just a marketing gimmick, pushed by marketers to dupe volume...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Steve You are quite correct that tick volume in my opinion is just a "activity metric" of tick activity, not volume which is of course executed market orders.. An extreme one minute candle at a reversal point can produce volume levels 30 to 50 times above average on just one candle. You won't see that much of a difference on a tick volume indicator between candles, its god dam fraud. Its the basic question really, why don't the brokers show us real volume levels when they can. Of course they don't want to give us any useful tool that...Ignored