Simple Trendline Orderflow System

Quoting Garrus

Disliked

Hey Guys, maybe we can add div for confirmation? Very interesting thread! {image} {image}

Ignored

Quoting clayton89

Disliked

Would these 2 charts be valid setups? NZDUSD is 4hr break and would look for LTF entry at this level. SILVER is 1hr break with TP around previous break for the move down. Would also look for retest on LTF for entry. {image} {image}

Ignored

Quoting scherzi

Disliked

{quote} This is my sole opinion. I don't know very well this specific technique. For me, this schema makes more sense. This is am order-flow schema, not the trades I would take. {image} Then, imo, your bearish setup is feasible. I think the following price schema is also valid. {image} With price schema I mean areas of S/R and their relevant strength. It does not mean price will follow that order, nor each area would make prices react in any particular order or depth. LTF for confirmation at each existing or new level is needed always as price evolves...

Ignored

Quoting EngineerFx

Disliked

{quote}

Ignored

Quoting Garrus

Disliked

Hey Guys, maybe we can add div for confirmation? Very interesting thread! {image} {image}

Ignored

Quoting josi

Disliked

{quote} Wyckoff would probably agree with what you call accumulation. He certainly wouldn't agree with what you call distribution. You may think this is just about words (phraseology) but actually the wrong word may well represent a faulty concept. But then again - who am I to tell you how to use pre-defined words (with their established contexts)? It was Wittgenstein who said (in German with an Austrian tinge, though):“Anything that can be said can be said clearly.” And this is me talking to someone who calls himself engineer (in German a synonym...

Ignored

Quoting EngineerFx

Disliked

{quote} The important thing to note, and I think most people get it, is that after a consolidation, price often tends to move very fast usually but not always after clearing out stops. I know the expression distribution may convey a slight different meaning to Wykcoff admirers but the idea here is that there is a release, so distribution resonates with this idea. But your continuous attempt at making comments that are borderline disrespectful is unwelcoming and unappreciated.

Ignored

Quoting EngineerFx

Disliked

{quote} The important thing to note, and I think most people get it, is that after a consolidation, price often tends to move very fast usually but not always after clearing out stops. I know the expression distribution may convey a slight different meaning to Wyckoff admirers but the idea here is that there is a release, so distribution resonates with this idea. But your continuous attempt at making comments that are borderline disrespectful is unwelcoming and unappreciated.

Ignored

Quoting EngineerFx

Disliked

{quote} Great that we are now reading price and using TLs as potential entry points. Riding on your analysis, this is a possible model price is playing, at least on this time frame. Price spent a lot of time ranging in that black box consolidation, with orders being accumulated. Then we had a strong move down, which according to this model, may be a run to clear stops and manipulate the herd into more selling. Then price reversed around 0.6810 and now appears bullish, in what we may call distribution. We are now at a TL break level and we may see...

Ignored

Quoting josi

Disliked

{quote} I guess the next step is to block me for making critical comments (There is a difference between "disrespectful" and critical, you know. Actually, to be critical - in my view - is to be respectful - because you take what the other person says seriously enough to bother whether it may be wrong or right). As Popper said: the attempt to falsify is what science is all about: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wf-sGqBsWv4

Ignored

Quoting scherzi

Disliked

{quote} When I say distribution, I also mean contract distribution. And contracts can be either long or short; therefore, distribution can be ascending or descending. Instead, when prices are idle, we can talk about accumulation of orders at relative highly liquid areas. Moreover, when someone buys a counterpart must sell; thus when prices moves, the number of short contracts equals the number of long contracts filled always. Same when price moves down. It is a misconception thinking that price moves up when buyers are leading and that prices move...

Ignored