Ratios & Harmonics: a Different Way to Trade | Page 1827 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

"Ratios & Harmonics: a Different Way to Trade." Summary 37 replies

Learning to trade with harmonics 11 replies

Time for Change - Pivots & Harmonics to freedom 67 replies

180 reasons to trade Harmonics and Patterns 13 replies

Group Trading based on Elliott wave and Harmonics 0 replies

Attachments: Ratios & Harmonics: a Different Way to Trade
Exit Attachments

Ratios & Harmonics: a Different Way to Trade

  • #36,521
  • Edited 3:19am Feb 4, 2018 2:56am | Edited 3:19am
Quoting Sheeep44
{quote} Thanks bro. I don't quite understand your question, how much % I make? It is quite irrelevant for you my man. I trade different pairs than you probably and different times due to an ever changing schedule so my profit factor could be way different than anyone else's.
Uhm, no I'm not curious about your total % you make (but I'm sure you're making alot based on your post history). I'm wondering how's your profit factor, which is the sum of all gross profit / gross loss. This stat can be found easily in ninjatrader or myfxbook. It's a good way to see the efficiency of any strategy.
Detach yourself from the value of money - Mr. Pip
  • #36,522
  • Feb 4, 2018 4:27am Feb 4, 2018 4:27am
Quoting Sheeep44
{quote} The expectation is still for a NSH (in your equity curve), and as we traders know, it plays out more than it doesn't. We just need to hope that it isn't an expectation failure..
Sheeep when you're seeing NSLs and NSHs in every graph and fib ratios all around you it's time to take a break.
You've been trading too much
  • #36,523
  • Feb 4, 2018 4:39am Feb 4, 2018 4:39am
Quoting evocpr19
{quote} Wish you all the best. Big respect that you share what you experience without filtering. Wish you many pips.
Thanks man I appreciate it.
I've always been open about everything from the beginning so my posts tell a story of a total newbie turning into.. well I hope a professional trader but the end is not written yet
Many pips to you too
  • #36,524
  • Feb 4, 2018 5:10am Feb 4, 2018 5:10am
Quoting Callitradar
{quote} By DD I mean the drawdown (you probably know that), but I just stated that because there are a lot of traders that trade like that. Yes, I would take the loss. I will show you an example, but before I do let me make my point clear. I'm against DDs period, BUT in some scenarios I don't mind them. That is why I do a top-down approach. If the long term is pointing one way I might consider it. I would close half of the position before doubling at another point. In other words, I dont have DD because I don't want to lose, its more about conviction...
Callitradar, thanks for taking the time to explain.
I was worried you were of the type "keep doubling until you win" and wanted to prevent you from blowing up.

Still, be careful with this approach. If I understand correctly, at one point you have 2.5 positions running.
All goes well as long as you are right at the second entry.
But if price keeps going against you, you incur a loss with 2.5 positions. And that could be substantial if your SL is in the right place.
You'll probably need more than 1 successful trade to recover from that, as you start any trade with only 1 position.

Maybe you have figured it all out and it works in the long run.
Just sharing thoughts ;-)
Green pips
  • #36,525
  • Feb 4, 2018 5:13am Feb 4, 2018 5:13am
Quoting Supreme1394
{quote} Uhm, no I'm not curious about your total % you make (but I'm sure you're making alot based on your post history). I'm wondering how's your profit factor, which is the sum of all gross profit / gross loss. This stat can be found easily in ninjatrader or myfxbook. It's a good way to see the efficiency of any strategy.

I don’t trade via NT. And my gross profit is irrelevant because it is different vary from account size to account size, but the % stays the same. Average r:r is around 1.4-1.7 and winrate is average 55-65% on Fx, didn’t trade YM much to this date so can’t comment on that..
+ it varies from person to oerson because there is always some subjectivity on any trading plan, so you have to find out yourself how efficient the strategy is for you.
"Luck is when opportunity meets preparation"
  • #36,526
  • Feb 4, 2018 5:15am Feb 4, 2018 5:15am
Quoting PeterT
{quote} Sheeep when you're seeing NSLs and NSHs in every graph and fib ratios all around you it's time to take a break. You've been trading too much
Haha no brake for me, money never sleeps.
No just kidding I don’t trade that often ( only traded a little over 2 full sessions past week ), quite busy currently with other things. BUT it could also be second nature
"Luck is when opportunity meets preparation"
  • #36,527
  • Feb 4, 2018 7:14am Feb 4, 2018 7:14am
Hi everyone , got question about this

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Untitled.png Size: 36 KB
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Untitled.png Size: 36 KB
  • #36,528
  • Feb 4, 2018 12:12pm Feb 4, 2018 12:12pm
Quoting 6288monkey
Hi everyone , got question about this {image}{image}
It is a bit difficult to say, since PA on the left is missing, but it looks like we got an immediate NSL (bottom of "1") and you consider then the move "1" as an expectation failure.

If you define now 1 as you dominant swing and you see it as a NSH (the expectation failure), then you are trading the immediate orderflow.
Hence, you should consider "1" and expect a deep retracement (which you got) and then an immediate NSH. If you would have followed the trailing rules of Damian, you would have probably got around 2/3 of "2". The only thing which I can see from your pic is that at 2/3 of "2" price is gaining strength. This could have you pointed to the conclusion that price is likely to go further higher.

Hope it helps.
  • #36,529
  • Feb 4, 2018 9:13pm Feb 4, 2018 9:13pm
Quoting evocpr19
{quote} It is a bit difficult to say, since PA on the left is missing, but it looks like we got an immediate NSL (bottom of "1") and you consider then the move "1" as an expectation failure. If you define now 1 as you dominant swing and you see it as a NSH (the expectation failure), then you are trading the immediate orderflow. Hence, you should consider "1" and expect a deep retracement (which you got) and then an immediate NSH. If you would have followed the trailing rules of Damian, you would have probably got around 2/3 of "2". The only thing...
can you edit on picture to shown which price would have gotten? what i can see was those immediate order have shallow correction + strong rotation which got no good chance to get into trade.

ofcourse we can ignore the immediate and trade the longer swing , but that was not what the market working toward at that point . maybe we have to just sit and see when the market give us the opportunity .

Edit - additional question , should the previous post picture , the immediate term shown NSL now after 2 , should we wait for signal to go long , or trade the immediate to go short? ( the results was NSH after the weak correction )

I am quite confuse when market keep changing it dynamic , dont know which order flow to be traded. ( and by focusing on the immediate term , we could lose grip on the longer term when the market changes and working toward longer term )

Else , we should just focus on 1 and 2 , then ignore all those immediate term.

Hope to get some insight
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Untitled.png Size: 37 KB
  • #36,530
  • Feb 4, 2018 11:31pm Feb 4, 2018 11:31pm
Short UJ 5min
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 59 KB
  • #36,531
  • Edited 4:25am Feb 5, 2018 3:26am | Edited 4:25am
Quoting 6288monkey
{quote} can you edit on picture to shown which price would have gotten? what i can see was those immediate order have shallow correction + strong rotation which got no good chance to get into trade. ofcourse we can ignore the immediate and trade the longer swing , but that was not what the market working toward at that point . maybe we have to just sit and see when the market give us the opportunity . Edit - additional question , should the previous post picture , the immediate term shown NSL now after 2 , should we wait for signal to go long ,...
I do not know what you mean by "...picture to shown which price would have gotten...". Please specify what you mean by that.
  • #36,532
  • Feb 5, 2018 4:51am Feb 5, 2018 4:51am
GBPUSD long on immediate OF
Expected one more swing in immediate because after the steep dive on the news event, price bounced of the blue area, made a (weak?) NSH in the immediate OF.
So expected deep correction, which I got (78.6%).
Got a good rotation candle and went long.
But price went deeper and currently testing the low again.
SL is beneath structure area but not sure I will survive..

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 132 KB
  • #36,533
  • Feb 5, 2018 5:02am Feb 5, 2018 5:02am
Quoting PeterT
GBPUSD long on immediate OF Expected one more swing in immediate because after the steep dive on the news event, price bounced of the blue area, made a (weak?) NSH in the immediate OF. So expected deep correction, which I got (78.6%). Got a good rotation candle and went long. But price went deeper and currently testing the low again. SL is beneath structure area but not sure I will survive.. {image}
SL hit -12.5 pips; -32 euro

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 140 KB
  • #36,534
  • Feb 5, 2018 6:04am Feb 5, 2018 6:04am
Quoting evocpr19
{quote} I do not know what you mean by "...picture to shown which price would have gotten...". Please specify what you mean by that.

If you would have followed the trailing rules of Damian, you would have probably got around 2/3 of "2".

Copied from your replied post , did you mean you took a trade around 2/3 of " 2 "?

hope i understand right.

Edit - see the mistake d , i look " trailing rules " as " trading rule "

Sorry , nothing then~

and Yes if trail will from 1 will be good profit.
  • #36,535
  • Feb 5, 2018 7:11am Feb 5, 2018 7:11am
I seem to be a little bit out of sync.
I pick the dodgy ones and miss out on the winners..
Oh well..
USDJPY, short
Expectation NSL
Got a deeper correction than my initial AOI.
Good rotation candle in structure area around 88.6% correction.

May be too big bull candles in my AOI will spoil the party..
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot2.png Size: 126 KB
  • #36,536
  • Feb 5, 2018 7:27am Feb 5, 2018 7:27am
My YM trade: Left 1 lot open and got taken out for +3. Entered then with full position again for +89
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: aaa.jpg Size: 296 KB
  • #36,537
  • Edited 7:41am Feb 5, 2018 7:29am | Edited 7:41am
Quoting 6288monkey
{quote} If you would have followed the trailing rules of Damian, you would have probably got around 2/3 of "2". Copied from your replied post , did you mean you took a trade around 2/3 of " 2 "? hope i understand right. Edit - see the mistake d , i look " trailing rules " as " trading rule " Sorry , nothing then~ and Yes if trail will from 1 will be good profit.
No, If you would have entered after deep retracement of "1", you would have stayed in the trade by trailing until the last third of "2" approximately. Otherwise, you would only get the 1:1 of 1 as profit.

More clear?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: sure.jpg Size: 119 KB
  • #36,538
  • Feb 5, 2018 7:45am Feb 5, 2018 7:45am
Quoting PeterT
I seem to be a little bit out of sync. I pick the dodgy ones and miss out on the winners.. Oh well.. USDJPY, short Expectation NSL Got a deeper correction than my initial AOI. Good rotation candle in structure area around 88.6% correction. May be too big bull candles in my AOI will spoil the party.. {image}
Update
After 100% correction bears crawled back to my BE point.
I reaaaaaally want to get out at BE.
But I don't have a single rule that says I should get out when 100% correction is reached

I have to work on emotions again. Thought I at least got the emotional part under control, but the more losses I have in a row the harder it gets..

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 136 KB
  • #36,539
  • Feb 5, 2018 8:04am Feb 5, 2018 8:04am
Quoting PeterT
{quote} Update After 100% correction bears crawled back to my BE point. I reaaaaaally want to get out at BE. But I don't have a single rule that says I should get out when 100% correction is reached I have to work on emotions again. Thought I at least got the emotional part under control, but the more losses I have in a row the harder it gets.. {image}
Going back up.
Only thing I'm liking is that price is sticking with the lower trendline, and the bulls look terrible to me at the moment. That can change of course..
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 132 KB
  • #36,540
  • Feb 5, 2018 8:24am Feb 5, 2018 8:24am
GM Traders, Let's see what the market offers today and also tomorrow is the live stream. I'm very excited and we will discuss graceful exits since the topic has come up in the thread with much discussion.
If you fail to plan, you plan to fail.
11 traders viewing now